|
|
Product Detail
| Journal of Health & Life Sciences Law, Vol. 1, Issue #3 |
| American Health Lawyers Association |
 |
| Price: |
$75.00 |
| Publisher: |
AHLA |
| Format: |
Book |
| ISBN: |
0006277521200 4/2008 |
|
 |
|
| Description |
Table of Contents »Concierge Medicine: Legal Issues, Ethical Dilemmas, and Policy Challenges
Robert M. Portman and Kate Romanow
ABSTRACT: The practice of concierge or retainer medicine is growingly steadily due to economic and legal pressures on physicians. This practice model, which typically involves charging access or subscription fees to a limited pool of patients, raises legal hazards, contractual challenges, and ethical dilemmas for physicians interested in converting to concierge medicine, as well as important health policy questions. This article examines these legal and contractual issues, and discusses some of the ethical and policy implications of this relatively new form of medical practice. The authors conclude that this innovative practice form provides a beneficial alternative for patients seeking more personal, proactive, and/or intensive medical care. As concierge medicine proliferates, a wider range of practice models and fee structures should make this approach more affordable to lower and middle income patients and help satisfy the need for greater access to preventive healthcare. Health policy makers should take steps to encourage this outcome.
Can Preventing Diversion of Profitable Patients Justify Hospitals Economic Credentialing Under the Antitrust Laws?
Mark L. Mattioli
ABSTRACT: Investments by physicians in specialty hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers, and other competing facilities have caused many full-service acute care hospitals a great deal of concern. These full-service hospitals believe they are at a disadvantage in competing against such centers because physician-investors allegedly can pre-select profitable patients. Full-service hospitals have reacted in a variety of ways, including adopting economic credentialing policies. Physician-owned centers often view these policies as anti-competitive and seek relief under the antitrust laws. Hospitals attempt to defend these actions on the grounds that they prevent what economists call free-riding. A key element of this defense is whether pre-selection is occurring and whether the hospital has sufficient evidence of pre-selection to justify the conduct under the antitrust laws.
HIPAA and Ex Parte InterviewsThe Beginning of the End?
Angela T. Burnette and DAndrea J. Morning
ABSTRACT: For many legal counsel, ex parte interviews with a treating physician have served as a time-honored method of informal discovery. In particular, litigators have used ex parte interviews with a former or current physician to obtain personal health information about a party or witness. Both before and after the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) Privacy Rule, privacy concerns developed regarding ex parte interviews. Has HIPAAs Privacy Rule initiated the beginning of the end for informally obtaining health information? This article examines ex parte interviews before the HIPAA Privacy Rule; how courts have addressed ex parte interviews after the Privacy Rule; conflicting issues physicians face in deciding whether to participate in ex parte interviews; and options for legal counsel to consider.
Home Healthcare Workers and the Fair Labor Standards Act
Rebecca M. Fowler
ABSTRACT: In a major industry shift, long term care is moving from nursing homes and institutions to the private home. This change results from a number of factors, including the lower cost of home-based care. These lower costs can be traced to a number of exemptions from the Fair Labor Standards Act requirements for minimum wage and premium overtime payments which apply to many home healthcare workers. These include the companionship, live-in, and professional exemptions. As the home healthcare industry has grown, home healthcare workers have challenged the applicability of these exemptions. This article will explore the issues reflected in those challenges and their resolution, and provide suggestions to help employers ensure that their employees fall within the exemptions.
Practice Resource
Drafting Arbitration Provisions for Complex Business Litigation in Healthcare
Daniela F. Almeida, Esquire
Practice Resource
State Case Summaries: Patient Arbitration
Adapted from an analysis by the Long Term Care and Healthcare Liability and Litigation Practice Groups of the American Health Lawyers Association
CITATION: AHLA, State Case Summaries: Patient Arbitration, J. Health & Life Sci. L., April 2008, at 159. © 2008 American Health Lawyers Association. All rights reserved. This data was originally published as the Arbitration Case Grid in the Arbitration and Dispute Resolution Toolkit.
The Journal of Health and Life Sciences Law is published four times a year in coordination with LexisNexis, and will contain in-depth, professionally reviewed articles of interest to healthcare attorneysincluding those who represent researchers, board members, institutions, practitioners, employers, and multi-state entities. The Journal will also contain "Notes and Comments" focused on new ideas as well as current developments, as well as "Practice Resources" which will help the reader excel in their practice-checklists, glossaries, reference tools and other useful items.
Articles featured in Volume I, Issue #3 (April 2008):
"Concierge Medicine: Legal Issues, Ethical Dilemmas, and Policy Challenges" -- Robert M. Portman and Kate Romanow
"Can Preventing Diversion of Profitable Patients Justify Hospitals Economic Credentialing Under the Antitrust Laws?" -- Mark L. Mattioli
"HIPAA and Ex Parte InterviewsThe Beginning of the End?" -- Angela T. Burnette and DAndrea J. Morning
"Home Healthcare Workers and the Fair Labor Standards Act" -- Rebecca M. Fowler
Practice Resource: "Drafting Arbitration Provisions for Complex Business Litigation in Healthcare" -- Daniela F. Almeida
Practice Resource: "State Case Summaries: Patient Arbitration"
|
|