Copyright & Trademark Law Community | LexisNexis
Featured Content
  • Top 10 Cases
  • Top 10 Trademark Cases for the Month of August 2012

09/04/2012 03:08:00 PM EST

Top 10 Trademark Cases for the Month of August 2012

1. Lewis Bros. Bakeries v. Interstate Brands Corp. (In re Interstate Bakeries Corp.), No. 11-1850, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 18403, January 10, 2012, Submitted, August 30, 2012, Filed [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

OVERVIEW:  Trademark license agreement was property found to be an executory contract under 11 U.S.C.S. § 365, as a material obligation remained; the agreement provided that the licensee's failure to maintain the quality of goods would have been a material breach, and the debtor also maintained material obligations.

CORE TERMS:  license agreement, trademark, executory contract, license, executory, material breach, territory, infringement, battery, integrated agreement ...

 

2. Cmty. Trust Bancorp, Inc. v. Cmty. Trust Fin. Corp., No. 11-6048, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT,  12a0282p.06;, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 17853; 2012 FED App. 0282P (6th Cir.), July 26, 2012, Argued, August 23, 2012, Decided, August 23, 2012, Filed [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

OVERVIEW:  District court improperly found personal jurisdiction over three corporations in an action by a Kentucky corporation for trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C.S. § 1114(1) of the Lanham Act because the three corporations' only activity in Kentucky was not substantially connected with the underlying trademark infringement claim.

CORE TERMS:  personal jurisdiction, banking, online, customers, forum state, passwords, website, cause of action, quotation marks omitted, substantial connection ...

 

3. DuoProSS Meditech Corp. v. Inviro Med. Devices, Ltd., 2012-1050, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 17009, August 14, 2012, Decided [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

OVERVIEW:  Trademarks could not be registered on the principal register if, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, the mark was merely descriptive of them, under 15 U.S.C.S. § 1052(e)(1), and was only further described with puffery.

CORE TERMS:  snap, descriptive, syringe, safer, registration, plunger, consumer, needle, exclamation point, impression ...

 

4. Eureka Water Co. v. Nestle Waters N. Am., Inc., No. 11-6104 and 11-6116, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 16149, August 3, 2012, Filed [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

OVERVIEW:  Defendant was entitled to JMOL on a contract claim because the parties' 1975 agreement as to a trademark license unambiguously did not cover spring water, and under Oklahoma contract law (which applied because the agreement did not come under Okla. Stat. tit. 12A, § 2-202, of the UCC) extrinsic evidence on the contract's meaning was inadmissible.

CORE TERMS:  drinking water, purified, spring water, distributor, concentrate, trademark, license, supplier, territory--, extrinsic evidence ...

 

5. Lens.com, Inc. v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc., 2011-1258, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 686 F.3d 1376; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 16138; 103 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1672, August 3, 2012, Decided [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

OVERVIEW:  Decision cancelling appellant's registration for the mark LENS due to nonuse was affirmed because the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board applied the correct test for determining "use in commerce" under 15 U.S.C.S. § 1127 of a mark for software, and appellant's software was merely the conduit through which it rendered its online retail services.

 

6. Purepecha Enters. v. El Matador Spices & Dry Chiles, Case No. 11 C 2569, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120499, August 24, 2012, Decided, August 24, 2012, Filed [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

CORE TERMS:  trademark, adobo, summary judgment, chorizo, registration, genuine, cancellation, spice, bullfighter, Lanham Act ...

 

7. Swatch, S.A. v. Beehive Wholesale, L.L.C., Civil Action No.: 1:11-cv-434, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA, ALEXANDRIA DIVISION, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116585, August 16, 2012, Decided, August 16, 2012, Filed [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

OVERVIEW:  The most significant factor of the consumer confusion analysis, actual confusion, weighed decidedly against the plaintiff in a trademark infringement action because there was a lack of similarity between the marks, lack of predatory intent, lack of similar advertising and only minimal similarity in facilities.

CORE TERMS:  watch, trademark, similarity, famous, consumer--, advertising, infringement, dilution, suggestive, band ...

 

8. Perfect Pearl Co. v. Majestic Pearl & Stone, Inc., 10 Civ. 3998 (PAE), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114606, August 14, 2012, Decided, August 14, 2012, Filed [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

CORE TERMS:  majestic, pearl, jewelry, summary judgment, trademark, consumer, Lanham Act, registration, trademark infringement, distinctive ...

 

9. Coach, Inc. v. Farmers Mkt. & Auction, Civil Action No. AW-11-01239, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND, SOUTHERN DIVISION, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110123, August 7, 2012, Decided, August 7, 2012, Filed [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

OVERVIEW:  Defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's action alleging contributory trademark counterfeiting under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C.S. § 1114, was denied because plaintiff stated a facially plausible claim for contributory trademark violations. It alleged prior raids and seizures, a notification of violations, and the sending of company investigators.

CORE TERMS:  contributory, trademark, trade dress, infringement, vendor, dilution, false advertising, copyright infringement, designation, investigator ...

 

10. Ariel Preferred Retail Group v. CWCapital Asset Mgmt., Case No. 4:10CV623SNLJ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DIVISION, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107483, August 1, 2012, Decided, August 1, 2012, Filed [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

CORE TERMS:  receiver, receivership, manager, trademark, licensing agreement, trade names, leasing, servicer, transition, default ...

....

Sign in with your Lexis.com ID to access Trademark Law resources on Lexis.com or any of these Mathew Bender Trademark Law publications:

Click here to order Trademark Law treatises/resources and Mathew Bender publications. 

LexisNexis Publications:

View the LexisNexis Catalog of Legal and Professional Publications

LexisNexis eBooks

Click here for a list of available LexisNexis eBooks.

Click here to learn more about LexisNexis eBooks.

For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site.


Add a Comment

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  
Enter the Image Code: