﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../StyleSheet/rss.xsl"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Copyright &amp; Trademark Law Community Copyright &amp; Trademark</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/copyright-trademarklaw</link><description>The platform that enables you to build rich, interactive communities</description><copyright>http://www.lexisnexis.com/terms/copyright.aspx</copyright><atom:link href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/copyright-trademarklaw/Rss.aspx?id=51" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Who Owns #Hashtags? </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/05/13/who-owns-hashtags.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/05/13/who-owns-hashtags.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LegalBusiness/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Miscellaneous+Images/ContentImage_2D00_Hashtag.jpg" style="max-width:550px;border:0;float:left;margin-top:4px;margin-bottom:4px;margin-left:12px;margin-right:12px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;Proliferation of social media continues to stretch the
boundaries of the law and its definitions. It prompts us to apply the proven
legal concepts to new technological and social phenomena with no clear and
well-defined answers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A good example is a question of whether Twitter hashtags are anybody&amp;#39;s
intellectual property. If yes, then can a non-descriptive hashtag be used as a
trademark? Does it mean that we need to expand our trademark searches to
include Twitter hashtags? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, let&amp;#39;s look at the definition of a hashtag. A hashtag is a word preceded
by a &amp;quot;#&amp;quot; symbol that was first proposed by Chris Messina to tag topics of
interest</description><author>arina.shulga@gmail.com (Arina Shulga)</author><pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 17:16:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Nimmer on Copyright: Celebrating 50 Years -- A Copyright Matters Event</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/05/01/nimmer-on-copyright-celebrating-50-years-a-copyright-matters-event.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/05/01/nimmer-on-copyright-celebrating-50-years-a-copyright-matters-event.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Please click the Attachment: post above to view the brochure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LegalBusiness/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.IP+Images/Nimmer-Lecture-Invitation-05-06-2013.gif" style="max-width:550px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>LNCopyrightStaffSpecialgavel@placeholder.com (Copyright &amp; Trademark Law Community Staff-)</author><pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 09:06:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>DLA Piper Alert-NLA v Meltwater: The UK Supreme Court Makes a Reference to CJEU on the Issue of Temporary Copies</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/04/26/dla-piper-alert-nla-v-meltwater-the-uk-supreme-court-makes-a-reference-to-cjeu-on-the-issue-of-temporary-copies.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/04/26/dla-piper-alert-nla-v-meltwater-the-uk-supreme-court-makes-a-reference-to-cjeu-on-the-issue-of-temporary-copies.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LegalBusiness/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Miscellaneous+Images/ContentImage_2D00_Gavel.jpg" style="max-width:550px;border:0;float:left;margin-top:6px;margin-bottom:6px;margin-left:12px;margin-right:12px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;The UK Supreme Court has handed down its judgment in the
case of &lt;i&gt;Public Relations Consultants Association Limited (PRCA) and the
Newspaper Licensing Agency (NLA) &amp;amp; Ot&lt;/i&gt;hers. Whilst expressing the view
that merely viewing copyright material online (as opposed to downloading or
printing that material) does not amount to copyright infringement, it has
nevertheless made a reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union for
clarification of its understanding of European law, given that the judgment
will have important implications for many millions of people across the
European Union. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;b&gt;The issues &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meltwater operates an online</description><author>DLAPiper@placeholder.com (DLA Piper)</author><pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:44:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>"Do Not Track" Impasse Threatens Future of Online Behavioral Advertising</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/04/15/quot-do-not-track-quot-impasse-threatens-future-of-online-behavioral-advertising.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/04/15/quot-do-not-track-quot-impasse-threatens-future-of-online-behavioral-advertising.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LEGALBUSINESS/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Miscellaneous+Images/ContentImage_2D00_OnlineAdvertising.jpg" style="max-width:550px;border:0;float:left;margin-top:6px;margin-bottom:6px;margin-left:12px;margin-right:12px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;Excerpt:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Online Behavioral Advertising
(&amp;quot;OBA&amp;quot;) involves the use of information collected about consumers for
the purpose of targeting them with ads based on their interests. This
information is collected from the consumers&amp;#39; web surfing, their queries to
search engines, and even from the content of their e-mails. The past few years
have witnessed a robust debate over the types of conduct (if any) that ought properly
to be permitted in implementing OBA. Among the stakeholders are various
components of the OBA industry, governments, consumer advocates, and consumers
themselves. Proponents of OBA claim that it funds the World Wide Web, and</description><author>david.bender@dlapiper.com (David Bender)</author><pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:27:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Why Legal and Marketing Conflict on How to Choose a Trademark</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/04/10/why-legal-and-marketing-conflict-on-how-to-choose-a-trademark.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/04/10/why-legal-and-marketing-conflict-on-how-to-choose-a-trademark.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LegalBusiness/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images/trademark-blueprint.jpg" style="max-width:550px;border:0;float:left;margin-top:6px;margin-bottom:6px;margin-left:12px;margin-right:12px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;by Donna Ray Berkelhammer&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you work with &lt;a href="http://mashable.com/category/startups/" target="_blank" title="Startups on Mashable"&gt;startups &lt;/a&gt;as I do, one of the first issues is
choosing the company or product name.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have worked with countless marketing companies that
advised their clients to &amp;quot;be descriptive&amp;quot; when selecting the name of a company
or product.&amp;nbsp; Having a name that describes an aspect of the product or
service allegedly makes it easier to market that product.&amp;nbsp; You allegedly
don&amp;#39;t have to spend as much consumer education or advertising.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But, truly descriptive marks get relatively little
protection under the trademark law.&amp;nbsp;</description><author>Sands.Anderson@placeholder.com (Sands Anderson PC)</author><pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:42:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Of Patents, Trademarks and Copyrights</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/04/03/of-patents-trademarks-and-copyrights.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/04/03/of-patents-trademarks-and-copyrights.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LegalBusiness/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images/patent-highlighted.jpg" style="max-width:550px;border:0;float:left;margin-top:6px;margin-bottom:6px;margin-left:12px;margin-right:12px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;by Donna Ray Berkelhammer&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Entrepreneurs often know they need to protect their
intellectual property, but often they don&amp;#39;t understand what kind of &lt;a href="http://www.wikinvest.com/metric/Intangible_Assets" target="_blank" title="Intangible Assets"&gt;intangible asset&lt;/a&gt; can be protected and under what
law.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Patents:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patents protect devices, processes, article of
manufacture or composition of matter.&amp;nbsp; The inventor basically has a
monopoly for approximately 20 years from the date of filing to make, use, distribute
or sell the invention.&amp;nbsp; To get patent protection, the invention must be
useful, novel &amp;nbsp;and non-obvious; it may not be just an idea, theory</description><author>Sands.Anderson@placeholder.com (Sands Anderson PC)</author><pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:19:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Fourth Circuit Holds Trademark Infringement Defendant Threw in the [Paper] Towel with Respect to Preclusion Defenses</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/03/29/fourth-circuit-holds-trademark-infringement-defendant-threw-in-the-paper-towel-with-respect-to-preclusion-defenses.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/03/29/fourth-circuit-holds-trademark-infringement-defendant-threw-in-the-paper-towel-with-respect-to-preclusion-defenses.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LegalBusiness/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Miscellaneous+Images/ContentImage_2D00_Gavel2.jpg" style="max-width:550px;border:0;float:left;margin-top:6px;margin-bottom:6px;margin-left:12px;margin-right:12px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;by&lt;/i&gt; Stan Hammer&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In its second published opinion vacating the judgment of
the district court, the Fourth Circuit recently ordered that a jury&amp;#39;s verdict
awarding Georgia-Pacific nearly $800,000 in damages for trademark infringement
be reinstated. &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://virginiaiplaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/121444.P.pdf"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Georgia-Pacific
Consumer Prods., LP v. Von Drehle Corp.&lt;/i&gt;, No. 12-1444 (4th Cir. Mar. 14,
2013)&lt;/a&gt; [&lt;a href="http://www.lexis.com/xlink?showcidslinks=on&amp;amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00237&amp;amp;searchtype=get&amp;amp;search=2013%20U.S.%20App.%20LEXIS%205108" target="_blank"&gt;an enhanced version of this opinion is available to lexis.com
subscribers</description><author>Troutman.Sanders@placeholder.com (Troutman Sanders)</author><pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 12:34:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>LexisNexis Acquires 55 Analytical Titles from Oxford University Press</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/03/26/lexisnexis-acquires-55-analytical-titles-from-oxford-university-press.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/03/26/lexisnexis-acquires-55-analytical-titles-from-oxford-university-press.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;LexisNexis has acquired 55 analytical titles from Oxford University
Press, U.S. Law Division, and will integrate them into the Matthew Bender&amp;reg; portfolio
of legal products. 36 Intellectual Property titles highlight the portfolio. The
titles are available for purchase on the &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/store/"&gt;LexisNexis Store&lt;/a&gt;; e-book and online versions
will be available in June.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Please
click on the Attachment: link at the top of the post to view or download the
entire list (.pdf)&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>Gears@placeholder.com (LexisNexis Patent Law Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:38:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Foley &amp; Lardner: ICANN Opens Trademark Clearinghouse as Part of Imminent Domain Name Expansion</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/03/26/foley-amp-lardner-icann-opens-trademark-clearinghouse-as-part-of-imminent-domain-name-expansion.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/03/26/foley-amp-lardner-icann-opens-trademark-clearinghouse-as-part-of-imminent-domain-name-expansion.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LEGALBUSINESS/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Miscellaneous+Images/ContentImage_2D00_InternetDomain_2800_org_2900_.jpg" style="max-width:550px;border:0;float:left;margin-top:6px;margin-bottom:6px;margin-left:12px;margin-right:12px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;With the launch of possibly hundreds of new generic
top-level domains (gTLDs) on the horizon, the Internet Corporation for Assigned
Names and Numbers (ICANN) will open on March 26, 2013 the Trademark
Clearinghouse (TMCH), in which brand owners can record their trademarks. The
TMCH is a centralized repository for validated trademark information that can
help protect against unauthorized registrations of trademarks as second-level
domains (SLDs) within the new gTLD program. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trademark owners are concerned about their principal brands being registered by
third parties as SLDs (i.e., the word &amp;quot;before the dot&amp;quot;) in new gTLDs open to</description><author>FoleyandLardner@placeholder.com (Foley &amp; Lardner LLP)</author><pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:24:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Kenyon and Kenyon LLP: New gTLD Trademark Clearinghouse Opening March 26, 2013 </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/03/19/kenyon-and-kenyon-llp-new-gtld-trademark-clearinghouse-opening-march-26-2013.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/03/19/kenyon-and-kenyon-llp-new-gtld-trademark-clearinghouse-opening-march-26-2013.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LEGALBUSINESS/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Miscellaneous+Images/ContentImage_2D00_ComputerDomain.jpg" style="max-width:550px;border:0;float:left;margin-top:6px;margin-bottom:6px;margin-left:12px;margin-right:12px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;by&amp;nbsp;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.kenyon.com/Our-People/K/KellyMichael.aspx"&gt;Michael Kelly&lt;/a&gt;
and &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.kenyon.com/Our-People/M/MarshMichelle.aspx"&gt;Michelle
Mancino Marsh&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The new generic Top-Level Domain (&amp;quot;gTLD&amp;quot;) program will
soon be bringing a flood of diversity to the internet&amp;#39;s domain name system.
Over 1,900 new gTLD applications have been submitted for gTLDs such as
&amp;quot;.apple,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;.shoes,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;.llc,&amp;quot; and the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names
and Numbers (&amp;quot;ICANN&amp;quot;), the organization that devised the program, expects
technical testing for the new domains to</description><author>KenyonandKenyon@placeholder.com (Kenyon &amp; Kenyon LLP)</author><pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 11:28:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Developments In NC State Trademark Law </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/03/06/developments-in-nc-state-trademark-law.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/03/06/developments-in-nc-state-trademark-law.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LegalBusiness/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images/Trademark-Puzzle.jpg" style="max-width:550px;border:0;float:left;margin-top:6px;margin-bottom:6px;margin-left:12px;margin-right:12px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;When I last wrote about &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbusinesslitigationreport.com/2013/01/articles/watching-the-court/funeral-homes-in-charlotte-battle-over-trademark-infringement/"&gt;SCI
North Carolina Funeral Services, LLC v. McEwen Ellington Funeral Services,
Inc.,&lt;/a&gt; Judge Murphy had entered a TRO against the Defendants for trademark
infringement over their use of the McEwen name in their funeral home business.
&amp;nbsp;The case seemed cut and dried then, and it looked like that the
Defendants had no defense to the infringement claim.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last week, Judge Murphy entered a preliminary injunction
in the same case in&amp;nbsp;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbusinesslitigationreport</description><author>msperling@brookspierce.com (Mack Sperling)</author><pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 14:49:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Ten Copyright Myths</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/03/05/ten-copyright-myths.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/03/05/ten-copyright-myths.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LegalBusiness/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.IP+Images/ContentImage_2D00_Copyright.jpg" style="max-width:550px;border:0;float:left;margin-top:6px;margin-bottom:6px;margin-left:12px;margin-right:12px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;by Donna Ray Berkelhammer&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many people do not understand how work product is
protected and what you can do with other people&amp;#39;s work. &amp;nbsp;Let&amp;#39;s take a look
at 10 copyright myths:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. &amp;nbsp;&lt;b&gt;I have to register my work to get a
copyright.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. &amp;nbsp;&lt;b&gt;I can get a copyright by mailing my work to
myself.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Copyrights attach once an original work is &amp;quot;fixed&amp;quot; in a
&amp;quot;tangible&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;medium. So once the photographer takes the picture, the
author writes the blog, the graphic artist posts the logo, they have rights in
the work. &amp;nbsp;These include the right to copy, distribute, display, perform
and make derivative works</description><author>Sands.Anderson@placeholder.com (Sands Anderson PC)</author><pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 08:16:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>NAACP Suing Unofficial Chicago Branch for Trademark Infringement</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/03/01/naacp-suing-unofficial-chicago-branch-for-trademark-infringement.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/03/01/naacp-suing-unofficial-chicago-branch-for-trademark-infringement.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" title="Courthouse" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/COPYRIGHT-TRADEMARKLAW/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/ContentImage_5F00_CourtHouse.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="border:0;float:left;margin:11px;" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/COPYRIGHT-TRADEMARKLAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/ContentImage_5F00_CourtHouse.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;The NAACP &lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/COPYRIGHT-TRADEMARKLAW/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Documents.IP+Documents/NCAAP-v-NCAAP.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;has accused&lt;/a&gt; an unofficial Chicago branch of
infringing its trademark. In a complaint filed yesterday in the Northern
District of Illinois, the NAACP South Side Branch has been accused of trademark infringement, dilution, false advertising, and fraud.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Defendants are engaged</description><author>travis.burchart@lexisnexis.com (Travis Burchart)</author><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 12:45:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Someday, You Might Need a Trademark License to Use Christmas’ Red-Green Color Scheme</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/02/27/someday-we-might-need-a-trademark-license-to-use-christmas-red-green-color-scheme.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/02/27/someday-we-might-need-a-trademark-license-to-use-christmas-red-green-color-scheme.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" title="Red Green Wrapping" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/Christmas-Wrapping.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="border:0;float:left;margin:11px;" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/Christmas-Wrapping.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Okay, so Christmas&amp;#39; red-green motif isn&amp;#39;t actually in
jeopardy, but the use of colors (in particular, red and green) as trademarks is becoming a&amp;nbsp;reoccurring legal theme.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First, it was red.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the case of &lt;i&gt;Christian
Louboutin v. Yves Saint Laurent&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/fashionindustrylaw/archive/2013/01/30/christian-louboutin-v-yves-saint-laurent-the-trademark-battle-for-the-color-red-may-continue.aspx" target</description><author>travis.burchart@lexisnexis.com (Travis Burchart)</author><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:16:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Do You Consider Hyperlinking to Be Copyright Infringement? The Question Has Come Up in Europe</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/02/20/do-you-consider-hyperlinking-to-be-copyright-infringement-the-question-has-come-up-in-europe.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/02/20/do-you-consider-hyperlinking-to-be-copyright-infringement-the-question-has-come-up-in-europe.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" title="Hyperlink" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/hyperlink.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="border:0;float:right;margin:3px;" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/hyperlink.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has been
asked to provide a ruling on how EU copyright law applies to hyperlinks. Late last year, a&amp;nbsp;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&amp;amp;docid=130286&amp;amp;pageIndex=0&amp;amp;doclang=EN&amp;amp;mode=req&amp;amp;dir=&amp;amp;occ=first&amp;amp;part=1&amp;amp;cid=1511287"&gt;Swedish court asked the CJEU&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left:30px;"&gt;If anyone other than the holder of
copyright in a certain work supplies a clickable link to the work on his</description><author>travis.burchart@lexisnexis.com (Travis Burchart)</author><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:37:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Dear Parents, We Own Your Child’s Copyrights, Signed – The School Board</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/02/13/dear-parents-we-own-your-child-s-copyrights-signed-the-school-board.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/02/13/dear-parents-we-own-your-child-s-copyrights-signed-the-school-board.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" title="Student Writings" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/COPYRIGHT-TRADEMARKLAW/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/student-writings.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="border:0;float:left;margin:11px;" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/COPYRIGHT-TRADEMARKLAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/student-writings.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;A Board of Education in Maryland is attempting to exert ownership over the
copyrights of teachers, students and employees.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to &lt;a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/12/maryland-proposal-to-claim-copyright-on-students-work-prompts-backlash-legal/" target="_blank"&gt;Fox
News&lt;/a&gt;, a proposed draft from Maryland&amp;#39;s Prince George County Board would
provide the Board with copyright ownership in works &amp;quot;created by employees and/or
students specifically for use&amp;quot; by the</description><author>travis.burchart@lexisnexis.com (Travis Burchart)</author><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 13:09:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>New York Pro Bono Files Cyberpiracy Lawsuit to Recover www.lawhelpny.org Domain Name</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/02/12/new-york-pro-bono-files-cyberpiracy-lawsuit-to-recover-www-lawhelpny-org-domain-name.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/02/12/new-york-pro-bono-files-cyberpiracy-lawsuit-to-recover-www-lawhelpny-org-domain-name.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/COPYRIGHT-TRADEMARKLAW/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/domain-name1.jpg" title="Domain Name" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img border="0" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/COPYRIGHT-TRADEMARKLAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/domain-name1.jpg" style="border:0;float:left;margin:11px;" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Pro Bono Net, Inc. &lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/TAXLAW/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Documents.IP+Documents/Pro-Bono-v-Law-Help.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;is accusing&lt;/a&gt; a Vietnamese domain name registrant of cyberpiracy
in conjunction with the registration of www.lawhelpny.org.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Internet users are likely to be misled into believing that the website is affiliated with Pro Bono Net&amp;#39;s LAWHELP services,&amp;quot; the complaint argues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The alleged registrant</description><author>travis.burchart@lexisnexis.com (Travis Burchart)</author><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 12:49:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>University of Oklahoma Files Cybersquatting Complaint against Registrant of soonernetwork.com</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/02/11/university-of-oklahoma-files-cybersquatting-complaint-against-registrant-of-soonernetwork-com.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/02/11/university-of-oklahoma-files-cybersquatting-complaint-against-registrant-of-soonernetwork-com.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target="_self" title="Football on Field" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/COPYRIGHT-TRADEMARKLAW/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/football-on-field.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="border:0;float:left;margin:11px;" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/COPYRIGHT-TRADEMARKLAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/football-on-field.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;The University of Oklahoma (OU) is &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/taxlaw/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Documents.IP+Documents/University-of-OK-v-Glenn.pdf"&gt;suing&lt;/a&gt; Hugh Michael Glenn,
who registered the domain name soonernetwork.com and linked it to the image
of a longhorn, representing OU&amp;#39;s rival the University of Texas. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The image also displayed the phrase &amp;quot;Go Longhorns!!!&amp;quot; and stated that the domain was for</description><author>travis.burchart@lexisnexis.com (Travis Burchart)</author><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 13:49:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Nimmer on Copyright Cited in 3000th Federal Court Decision</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/02/07/nimmer-on-copyright-cited-in-3000th-federal-court-decision.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/02/07/nimmer-on-copyright-cited-in-3000th-federal-court-decision.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/COPYRIGHT-TRADEMARKLAW/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/legal-citation.jpg" title="Legal Citation" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img border="0" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/COPYRIGHT-TRADEMARKLAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/legal-citation.jpg" style="border:0;float:left;margin:11px;" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/store/catalog/booktemplate/productdetail.jsp?pageName=relatedProducts&amp;amp;skuId=sku-us-ebook-00465-abridged-epub&amp;amp;catId=127&amp;amp;prodId=prod-us-ebook-00465-abridged-epub&amp;amp;loc=CTL&amp;amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00234"&gt;Nimmer on Copyright&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;i&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/i&gt;(searchable version available to &lt;a href="http://www.lexis.com/xlink?source=matben;NIMMER&amp;amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00234" target="_blank"&gt;lexis.com subscribers&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;i&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/i&gt;was cited in its</description><author>LexisNexisStaffCopyrightTM@placeholder.com (Copyright &amp; Trademark Law Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 09:58:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Eric E. Bensen on The Supreme Court's Decision Respecting the Impact of a Covenant Not to Sue on a Defendant's Standing to Seek a Declaratory Judgment of Trademark Invalidity</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/02/06/eric-e-bensen-on-the-impact-of-a-covenant-not-to-sue-on-a-defendant-s-standing-to-seek-a-declaratory-judgment-of-trademark-invalidity.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/02/06/eric-e-bensen-on-the-impact-of-a-covenant-not-to-sue-on-a-defendant-s-standing-to-seek-a-declaratory-judgment-of-trademark-invalidity.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" title="Supreme Court" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/ContentImage_5F00_Supreme-Court-_2800_2_2900_.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="border:0;float:right;margin:3px;" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/ContentImage_5F00_Supreme-Court-_2800_2_2900_.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Can a trademark owner avoid a declaratory judgment that its mark is invalid by granting an accused infringer a covenant not to sue and seeking dismissal of the action? In &lt;i&gt;Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc.&lt;/i&gt; [&lt;a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?app=00075&amp;amp;view=full&amp;amp;searchtype=get&amp;amp;search=2013%20U.S.%20LEXIS%20602&amp;amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00237" target="_blank"&gt;enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers&lt;/a&gt;], the U.S. Supreme</description><author>ericbensen@paulhastings.com (Eric E Bensen)</author><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 09:36:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>An Unpleasant Coincidence: Cheese &amp; Underwear at the Center of Two New Trademark Battles</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/02/04/an-unpleasant-coincidence-cheese-amp-underwear-at-the-center-of-two-new-trademark-battles.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/02/04/an-unpleasant-coincidence-cheese-amp-underwear-at-the-center-of-two-new-trademark-battles.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Some things just don&amp;#39;t go together, and it goes without saying that two of those things
are cheese and underwear. This is a safe bet. However, the two recently came together in the trademark world; that is, cheese and underwear connected like two planets aligning only once every millennium.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last Thursday, Kraft made cheese the focal point of its &lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/taxlaw/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Documents.IP+Documents/Kraft-v-Cracker-Barrel.pdf"&gt;trademark
complaint&lt;/a&gt; against Cracker Barrel. And on the same day, &lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/taxlaw/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Documents.IP+Documents/Jockey-v-Hanes.pdf"&gt;Jockey
accused Hanes&lt;/a&gt; of infringing its mark for women&amp;#39;s undergarments.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" title="Cheese" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/COPYRIGHT-TRADEMARKLAW/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/copyrightandtrademarklawblog</description><author>travis.burchart@lexisnexis.com (Travis Burchart)</author><pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 13:40:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>University of Texas’ “Hook 'em Horns” to Do Trademark Battle with Heavy Metal’s “Sign of the Horns”</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/01/29/university-of-texas-hook-em-horns-to-do-trademark-battle-with-heavy-metal-s-sign-of-the-horns.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/01/29/university-of-texas-hook-em-horns-to-do-trademark-battle-with-heavy-metal-s-sign-of-the-horns.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;We love our college football, and we love our heavy metal,
but the two can&amp;#39;t coexist according to the University of Texas (UT) - at
least in terms of hand signals.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/TAXLAW/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Documents.IP+Documents/U-of-Texas-v-Horns-Inc.pdf"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/COPYRIGHT-TRADEMARKLAW/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/aa1_2D00_29_2D00_2013-10_2D00_50_2D00_03-AM.png" title="UT&amp;#39;s Hook &amp;#39;em Horns" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img border="0" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/COPYRIGHT-TRADEMARKLAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/aa1_2D00_29_2D00_2013-10_2D00_50_2D00_03-AM.png" style="border:0;float:left;margin:11px;" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/TAXLAW/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components</description><author>travis.burchart@lexisnexis.com (Travis Burchart)</author><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:32:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Sheppard Mullin Richter &amp; Hampton LLPS: Thin Copyrights - Protected But Not Infringed</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/01/28/sheppard-mullin-richter-amp-hampton-llps-thin-copyrights-protected-but-not-infringed.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/01/28/sheppard-mullin-richter-amp-hampton-llps-thin-copyrights-protected-but-not-infringed.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" title="Sheppard Mullin Richter &amp;amp; Hampton Logo" href="http://www.sheppardmullin.com/"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/realestatelawblog/shep-mul.png" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;By&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.sheppardmullin.com/ekomen" target="_blank"&gt;Edwin Komen&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.intellectualpropertylawblog.com/uploads/file/blehm%20v%20jacobs%20-%2010th%20cir_%20-%2012-27-12.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;Blehm v. Jacobs&lt;/a&gt;, 10th Cir., No. 11-1479, December 27, 2012 [&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?app=00075&amp;amp;view=full&amp;amp;searchtype=get&amp;amp;search=2011%20U.S.%20Dist.%20LEXIS%20105583&amp;amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00234"&gt;enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/COPYRIGHT-TRADEMARKLAW/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles</description><author>SheppardMullinRichterHampton@placeholder.com (Sheppard Mullin)</author><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 06:56:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Worst Flu Season in Years Gives Rise to Flu Trademark Lawsuit</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/01/14/worst-flu-season-in-years-gives-rise-to-flu-trademark-lawsuit.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/01/14/worst-flu-season-in-years-gives-rise-to-flu-trademark-lawsuit.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/COPYRIGHT-TRADEMARKLAW/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/Syringe.jpg" title="Syringe" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img style="border:0;float:left;margin:11px;" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/COPYRIGHT-TRADEMARKLAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/Syringe.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Flu Shots of Texas, a mobile wellness-shot business, has
sued Flu Shots of Colorado, LLC and B 12 Shots of Colorado, accusing them of infringing
the protected marks &amp;quot;&lt;strong&gt;To Beat the Flu... We
Come to You&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;&lt;strong&gt;Flu Shots of
America&lt;/strong&gt;.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to the &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/taxlaw/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Documents.IP+Documents/Flu-Shot-TM-Case.pdf"&gt;complaint&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;filed last Friday, the defendants</description><author>LexisNexisStaffCopyrightTM@placeholder.com (Copyright &amp; Trademark Law Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 09:51:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Borrower Avoids Trademark and Cybersquatting Accusations in Bashing Its Lender Online</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/01/10/borrower-avoids-trademark-and-cybersquatting-accusations-in-bashing-its-lender-online.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/blogs/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/archive/2013/01/10/borrower-avoids-trademark-and-cybersquatting-accusations-in-bashing-its-lender-online.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/domain-name1.jpg" title="Domain Name" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img border="0" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/copyright-trademarklaw/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/domain-name1.jpg" style="border:0;float:left;margin:11px;" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;A Minnesota federal court rejected trademark and
cybersquatting claims levied against a borrower that created a website to warn consumers
about what it perceived to be a lender&amp;#39;s fraudulent business practices. &lt;i&gt;Jalin Realty Capital Advisors v. A Better
Wireless&lt;/i&gt;, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2461 (D. Minn. &amp;nbsp;January 8, 2013) [&lt;a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?app=00075&amp;amp;view=full&amp;amp;searchtype=get&amp;amp;search=2013%20U.S.%20Dist.%20LEXIS%202461&amp;amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00234" target="_blank"&gt;enhanced</description><author>travis.burchart@lexisnexis.com (Travis Burchart)</author><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 10:02:00 -0400</pubDate></item></channel></rss>