Judge Refuses To Strike Expert Testimony Finding Stanford Fit To Stand Trial

Title	Views
1	Dodd-Frank Law Sets New Rules for Compensation Consultants, Counsel and Other Advisers	10730
2	How Far Can the Plaintiffs Really Go With the Cases Against U.S.-Listed Chinese Companies?	9465
3	D & J Tire Inc. v. Hercules Tire & Rubber Co, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 4156 (5th Cir. February 26, 2010)	6355

Title

Views

Dodd-Frank Law Sets New Rules for Compensation Consultants, Counsel and Other Advisers

10730

How Far Can the Plaintiffs Really Go With the Cases Against U.S.-Listed Chinese Companies?

9465

D & J Tire Inc. v. Hercules Tire & Rubber Co, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 4156 (5th Cir. February 26, 2010)

6355

Title	Downl.
1	The Dodd-Frank Act, Commentary and Insights by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP & Associates--Chapter1: Orderly Liquidation Authority	24
2	The Dodd-Frank Act, Commentary and Insights by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP & Associates--Chapter1: Orderly Liquidation Authority	9

Title

Downl.

The Dodd-Frank Act, Commentary and Insights by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP & Associates--Chapter1: Orderly Liquidation Authority

HOUSTON - A federal judge in Texas on Jan. 5 refused to strike the testimony of a U.S. government expert witness who believes that alleged Ponzi scheme mastermind R. Allan Stanford has recovered enough from head injuries suffered in a prison fight to stand trial on criminal charges related to his operation of the scheme (United States of America v. Robert Allen Stanford, No. 09-342, S.D. Texas; See July 2011, Page 15, and related story in this issue). Full story on lexis.com

Featured Content

You are not logged in. Please Login to add content to your community page

Visit Other Communities By

Latest Postings

Most Viewed Postings

Popular Downloads

Judge Refuses To Strike Expert Testimony Finding Stanford Fit To Stand Trial

LexisNexis® Mealey's™ Emerging Securities Litigation Legal News