08/10/2010 02:16:00 PM EST
Calif. Supreme Court: Section 3345 Damages Are a Penalty, Not Available Under UCL
SAN FRANCISCO - The statute providing for treble damages
in cases brought by senior citizens alleging unfair competition provides for
such a remedy only as a penalty, making recovery under the unfair competition
law, Business and Professions Code Section 17200, et. seq., impossible, the California Supreme Court held Monday,
August 9 (James A. Clark v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, National
Western Life Insurance Co., No. S174229, Calif. Sup.).
The statutory construction of California Civil Code
Section 3345 indicates that the additional remedy it provides was intended as a
penalty and clearly requires such an outcome, the court said.
Section 3345 provides for treble damages "or any other
remedy the purpose or effect of which is to punish or deter." To read
that as anything but a penalty "would turn into meaningless surplusage the
phrase immediately preceding the statute's 'deter' language, which expressly
refers to a 'fine, or a civil penalty or other penalty,'" the court concluded.
"All remedies have some incidental deterrent effect. Here, the trebled recovery provision comes
into play when the governing statutory remedy has 'the purpose or effect' of punishing or deterring," the court held.
Therefore, trebled damages under Section 3345 are
permissible only if the statute under which recovery of those damages is sought
allows for recovery of a penalty, the court said. Because the unfair competition law limits
recovery to injunctions and restitution, it cannot be used to recover Section
3345 damages, the court held.
James Clark sued National Western Life Insurance Co. in
September 2004 in the Los Angeles County Superior Court, alleging that the
insurer deceived senior citizens into purchasing high-commission annuity
contracts. Clark alleged that the conduct violated the UCL, and he sought
treble damages under Section 3345.
The court also held that Section 3345 is not limited to
actions brought under the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, as defendant National
Western Life Insurance Co. had argued.
For all of your legal news needs, please visit www.lexisnexis.com/mealeys.
For
more information, call editor Bryan Redding at 610-205-1124, or e-mail him at bryan.redding@lexisnexis.com.