Corporate & Securities Law Community | LexisNexis
Featured Content
  • Add content to My Page

    Select any content type from the list, once selected it will be automatically added to your 'My Page'.


    You are not logged in. Please Login to add content to your community page

04/21/2010 01:00:00 PM EST

LexisNexis® Corporate & Securities Law Community Podcast featuring Richard Phillips and Mike Eisenberg on Jones v. Harris Associates

Posted by

LexisNexis Legal Business Community Staff

On this edition, Richard Phillips of K&L Gates and Professor Meyer "Mike" Eisenberg, Visiting Professor of Law at Willamette University College of Law, discuss the March 30, 2010 decision in Jones, et al. v. Harris Associates L.P., in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that the 7th Circuit erred in focusing on disclosure by investment advisers rather than the Gartenberg standard for determining whether an investment advisor had breached a fiduciary duty regarding compensation received from a mutual fund under Section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940. Copyright© 2010 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. Visit www.lexisnexis.com/community.

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Jones v. Harris Assocs. L. P., 2010 U.S. LEXIS 2926 (March 30, 2010)

Non-subscribers can view the free, unenhanced version of Jones v. Harris Assocs. L. P. on lexisONE's Free Case Law. 

 


Comments

TOP CASES wrote Jones v. Harris Assocs. L. P., 2010 U.S. LEXIS 2926 (March 30, 2010)
on Wed, May 5 2010 6:39 PM

LexisNexis Overview: For liability under 15 U.S.C.S. § 80a-35(b), an adviser's fee had to be

Add a Comment

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  
Enter the Image Code: