﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../StyleSheet/rss.xsl"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Estate Practice &amp; Elder Law Community Gifts &amp; Charity</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/estate-elderlaw</link><description>Estate Practice &amp; Elder Law Community, LexisNexis</description><copyright>http://www.lexisnexis.com/terms/copyright.aspx</copyright><atom:link href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/estate-elderlaw/Rss.aspx?id=509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Morrison &amp; Foerster LLP: Funding the Family Foundation: Qualified Appreciated Stock</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2013/02/05/morrison-amp-foerster-llp-funding-the-family-foundation-qualified-appreciated-stock.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2013/02/05/morrison-amp-foerster-llp-funding-the-family-foundation-qualified-appreciated-stock.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p style="padding-left:180px;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mofo.com/" target="_blank" title="Morrison &amp;amp; Foerster LLP"&gt;&lt;img border="0" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x1500/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/practitionerscorner/8_2D00_1_2D00_2010-10_2D00_01_2D00_06-PM.png" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;By &lt;a href="http://www.mofo.com/Joy-MacIntyre/" target="_blank"&gt;Joy S. MacIntyre&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.mofo.com/" target="_blank"&gt;Morrison &amp;amp; Foerster LLP&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an earlier post we described
some of the tax benefits - and challenges - associated with donating corporate
securities to a family foundation or other private foundation.&amp;nbsp; On the right facts, the donor in such a case
can claim a deduction equal to the full fair market value of the securities
despite the fact that the donor will never be taxed on any gain</description><author>MorrisonFoersterLLP@placeholder.com (Morrison and Foerster LLP)</author><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 08:13:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>3 Year-End Giving Tips: Use All Your Deductions</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/12/26/3-year-end-giving-tips-use-all-your-deductions.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/12/26/3-year-end-giving-tips-use-all-your-deductions.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/ESTATE-ELDERLAW/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/estateplanningandprobateblog/Gregory-HGiddens.jpg" title="Gregory Herman-Giddens" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img border="0" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/ESTATE-ELDERLAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/estateplanningandprobateblog/Gregory-HGiddens.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The holiday season hits Americans just as the tax year is coming to an end. While most people are distracted with buying gifts for their friends and families, they could be enjoying tax deductions by making smart&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.ncestateplanningblog.com/articles/tax/gift-tax/" target="_blank"&gt;year-end gifts&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Choose a qualified organization.&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;When ready to make your gifts, choose organizations, charities, or research funds that qualify to receive deductible contributions. Registered</description><author>ghgiddens@trustcounselpa.com (Gregory Herman-Giddens)</author><pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:09:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Ballard Spahr LLP: Windows of Opportunity: Year-End Gift Planning Opportunities for 2012</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/11/14/ballard-spahr-llp-windows-of-opportunity-year-end-gift-planning-opportunities-for-2012.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/11/14/ballard-spahr-llp-windows-of-opportunity-year-end-gift-planning-opportunities-for-2012.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ballardspahr.com/" target="_blank" title="Ballard Spahr LLP"&gt;&lt;img border="0" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/ESTATE-ELDERLAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/practitionerscorner/7_2D00_5_2D00_2011-2_2D00_54_2D00_45-PM.png" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" title="Gift" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/giftsandcharity/gift.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="border:0;float:right;margin:3px;" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/giftsandcharity/gift.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;By the &lt;a href="http://www.ballardspahr.com/PracticeAreas/Practices/Family_Wealth_Management.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;Family Wealth Management Group
&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although the end of the year is several months away, it is time to think about taking advantage</description><author>BallardSpahr@placeholder.com (Ballard Spahr LLP)</author><pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 07:01:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>McNees Wallace &amp; Nurick LLC: Contribution to Construction Costs Supports Charitable Exemption</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/10/17/mcnees-wallace-amp-nurick-llc-contribution-to-construction-costs-supports-charitable-exemption.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/10/17/mcnees-wallace-amp-nurick-llc-contribution-to-construction-costs-supports-charitable-exemption.aspx</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 13:04:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Power to Substitute &amp; End of Year Planning</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/10/04/power-to-substitute-amp-end-of-year-planning.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/10/04/power-to-substitute-amp-end-of-year-planning.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" title="Tax Forms" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/giftsandcharity/Tax-Forms-general.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="border:0;float:left;margin:12px;" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/giftsandcharity/Tax-Forms-general.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;By:&amp;nbsp; David R. Schoenhaar, Esq.*&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you are currently planning for clients to use the
historically high gift tax exemption amount before the end of the year, you are
becoming acutely aware that time is running out. Whether it is the appraisal
companies refusing to take new business or the closing in on longer transfer
timeframes needed for more complex assets, the opportunity to transfer assets
is coming to a close.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For clients in this position, there may be a solution to &amp;quot;buy
some time.&amp;quot; The power to</description><author>DavidSchoenhaar@lexisnexis.com (David R. Schoenhaar)</author><pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 08:19:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Tax Treatment of Gifts, Dividends, or Loans to Employees </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/09/26/tax-treatment-of-gifts-dividends-or-loans-to-employees.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/09/26/tax-treatment-of-gifts-dividends-or-loans-to-employees.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" title="Gift" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/giftsandcharity/gift.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="border:0;float:right;margin:5px;" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/giftsandcharity/gift.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;By Mary Howley Esq.
&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although gifts are generally excluded from income, gifts from employers are generally included in income subject to certain exceptions. Payments labeled as compensation may be determined to be dividends, while payments labeled as a loan or payment for property may be determined to be compensation. This Analysis discusses factors to be taken into account in determining whether payments to employees are compensation or gifts, dividends, or loans.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left:30px;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Excerpt&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style</description><author>LexisNexisStaffEstateElder@placeholder.com (LexisNexis Estate and Elder Law Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 07:01:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Morrison &amp; Foerster LLP: Making Gifts Using Defined Value Clauses: Not Necessarily Void as Against Public Policy </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/09/03/morrison-amp-foerster-llp-making-gifts-using-defined-value-clauses-not-necessarily-void-as-against-public-policy.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/09/03/morrison-amp-foerster-llp-making-gifts-using-defined-value-clauses-not-necessarily-void-as-against-public-policy.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p style="padding-left:180px;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mofo.com/" target="_blank" title="Morrison &amp;amp; Foerster LLP"&gt;&lt;img border="0" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x1500/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/practitionerscorner/8_2D00_1_2D00_2010-10_2D00_01_2D00_06-PM.png" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;By &lt;a href="http://www.mofo.com/Danielle-Zaragoza/" target="_blank"&gt;Danielle T. Zaragoza,
Esq&lt;/a&gt;.,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.mofo.com/" target="_blank"&gt;Morrison &amp;amp;
Foerster LLP&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Given the
relatively large federal gift
tax applicable exclusion amount
available for taxable gifts in 2011 and 2012, many clients have made or are
considering making significant gifts before the end of this year. &amp;nbsp;For a client who wants to make gifts of
hard-to-value assets to use his or her full exclusion amount, but not exceed</description><author>MorrisonFoersterLLP@placeholder.com (Morrison and Foerster LLP)</author><pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 04:14:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Ballard Spahr LLP: IRS Announces that Gifts to Single-Member LLCs Owned by Charitable Organizations Are Deductible</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/08/15/ballard-spahr-llp-irs-announces-that-gifts-to-single-member-llcs-owned-by-charitable-organizations-are-deductible.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/08/15/ballard-spahr-llp-irs-announces-that-gifts-to-single-member-llcs-owned-by-charitable-organizations-are-deductible.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ballardspahr.com/" target="_blank" title="Ballard Spahr LLP"&gt;&lt;img border="0" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/ESTATE-ELDERLAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/practitionerscorner/7_2D00_5_2D00_2011-2_2D00_54_2D00_45-PM.png" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;By &lt;a href="http://www.ballardspahr.com/People/Attorneys/Hemphill_Jean.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;Jean C. Hemphill&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.ballardspahr.com/People/Attorneys/Jones_Christopher.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;Christopher A. Jones
&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The IRS has published welcome, long-awaited guidance regarding the deductibility of contributions made to a single-member limited liability company (LLC) owned by a charitable organization.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For a variety of reasons, tax-exempt charitable organizations frequently establish single-member LLCs that are wholly owned and controlled by the charitable organizations. Unless a single-member LLC elects to be treated as a corporation</description><author>BallardSpahr@placeholder.com (Ballard Spahr LLP)</author><pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:12:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>State Net Capitol Journal: CA State Park Donors Cry Foul</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/08/06/state-net-capitol-journal-ca-state-park-donors-cry-foul.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/08/06/state-net-capitol-journal-ca-state-park-donors-cry-foul.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" title="State Net Logo" href="http://www.statenet.com/"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/ESTATE-ELDERLAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/elderlawblog/StateNet_5F00_logo.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last month California officials revealed that the state Department of Parks and Recreation had stashed away $54 million it had not reported to the state Department of Finance. The news came as quite a surprise, especially to the groups that had generously donated to keep state parks open that the department said had to be closed to save $22 million.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;They sort of came to us under false pretenses,&amp;quot; said Reed Holderman, executive director of the Sempervirens Fund, a nonprofit conservation group. &amp;quot;They cried wolf, and we responded.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;Holderman&amp;#39;s group pledged $250,000 to keep Castle Rock State Park open, and he said the parks department</description><author>StateNet@placeholder.com (State Net)</author><pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 11:00:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Historic Estate &amp; Gift Tax Savings Opportunities Almost Gone</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/07/24/historic-estate-amp-gift-tax-savings-opportunities-almost-gone.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/07/24/historic-estate-amp-gift-tax-savings-opportunities-almost-gone.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" title="Tax Word Cloud" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/ESTATE-ELDERLAW/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/estateplanningandprobateblog/tax-word-cloud.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="border:0;float:left;margin:12px;" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/ESTATE-ELDERLAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/estateplanningandprobateblog/tax-word-cloud.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;By: David
R. Schoenhaar, Esq.*
&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We are half way
through 2012 and the generous tax legislation that went into effect on January
1, 2011, is scheduled to sunset on December 31, 2012, if Congress fails to act.
Those who can participate in significant gift planning must act now if they
plan to take advantage of the historic opportunities presented by the high gift
tax exemption amount before the close of 2012.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;What&amp;#39;s At Risk?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If
Congress does nothing</description><author>DavidSchoenhaar@lexisnexis.com (David R. Schoenhaar)</author><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 13:19:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Properly Reporting Gifts</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/06/08/properly-reporting-gifts.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/06/08/properly-reporting-gifts.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ofplaw.com/profiles.htm?id=9" target="_blank" title="John Dedon"&gt;&lt;img border="0" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/ESTATE-ELDERLAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/estateplanningandprobateblog/John-Dedon.png" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As 2013 approaches, there will be a flurry of activity by wealthy individuals seeking to take advantage of a gift tax exemption of $5,120,000, that will decrease to only $1 million in 2013.&amp;nbsp; Taxpayers often gift closely held business interests or real estate.&amp;nbsp; The gift value of this type of non-marketable property needs to be adequately disclosed on a gift tax return.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the gift tax return is not filed or if the gift is not properly reported, the IRS can adjust the value, even upon the taxpayer&amp;#39;s death on the estate tax return.&amp;nbsp; On the other hand, if the gift tax return is filed properly, then the Statute of Limitations starts to run.&amp;nbsp; The IRS would only</description><author>john.dedon@ofplaw.com (John Dedon)</author><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 10:17:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>McNees Wallace &amp; Nurick LLC: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Affirms Constitutional Test Must be Met by Those Seeking Charitable Exemptions</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/06/08/mcnees-wallace-amp-nurick-llc-supreme-court-affirms-constitutional-test-must-be-met-by-those-seeking-charitable-exemptions.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/06/08/mcnees-wallace-amp-nurick-llc-supreme-court-affirms-constitutional-test-must-be-met-by-those-seeking-charitable-exemptions.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mwn.com/" target="_blank" title="McNees Wallace &amp;amp; Nurick LLC"&gt;&lt;img border="0" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/COPYRIGHT-TRADEMARKLAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/8_2D00_10_2D00_2011-2_2D00_39_2D00_19-PM.png" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-style:italic;"&gt;By&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mwn.com/rvarner" style="font-style:italic;" target="_blank"&gt;Randy L. Varner&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a 4-3 decision, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, in&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;Mesivtah Eitz Chaim of Bobov, Inc. v. Pike County Board of Assessment Appeals,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/i&gt;No. 16 MAP 2011 (April 25, 2012) (&amp;quot;&lt;i&gt;Mesivtah&amp;quot;)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/i&gt;[&lt;a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?app=00075&amp;amp;view=full&amp;amp;searchtype=get&amp;amp;search=2012%20Pa.%20LEXIS%20964&amp;amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00266" target="_blank"&gt;enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers&lt;/a&gt;], held that a property owner seeking an exemption from</description><author>McNees@placeholder.com (McNees Wallace &amp; Nurick LLC)</author><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 04:05:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Ballard Spahr LLP: Back to the Future for Real Estate Tax Exemptions and PILOTs/SILOTs? Charities Must Meet HUP Test and Act 55, Pennsylvania High Court Rules</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/06/06/ballard-spahr-llp-back-to-the-future-for-real-estate-tax-exemptions-and-pilots-silots-charities-must-meet-hup-test-and-act-55-pennsylvania-high-court-rules.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/06/06/ballard-spahr-llp-back-to-the-future-for-real-estate-tax-exemptions-and-pilots-silots-charities-must-meet-hup-test-and-act-55-pennsylvania-high-court-rules.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ballardspahr.com/" target="_blank" title="Ballard Spahr LLP"&gt;&lt;img border="0" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/ESTATE-ELDERLAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/practitionerscorner/7_2D00_5_2D00_2011-2_2D00_54_2D00_45-PM.png" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;By &lt;a href="http://www.ballardspahr.com/People/Attorneys/Korb_Philip.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;Philip B. Korb&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.ballardspahr.com/People/Attorneys/Kotzen_Wendi.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;Wendi L. Kotzen&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For charitable organizations in Pennsylvania, obtaining and preserving real estate tax exemptions just got a little more difficult.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled that the statute intended to clarify the requirements for real estate tax exemption cannot replace the five-part test announced by the high court in 1985 because only the courts have the power to interpret the provisions of Pennsylvania&amp;#39;s constitution.&lt;</description><author>BallardSpahr@placeholder.com (Ballard Spahr LLP)</author><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 07:00:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>McNees Wallace &amp; Nurick LLC: Tax-Advantage Charitable Giving</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/05/18/mcnees-wallace-amp-nurick-llc-tax-advantage-charitable-giving.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/05/18/mcnees-wallace-amp-nurick-llc-tax-advantage-charitable-giving.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mwn.com/" target="_blank" title="McNees Wallace &amp;amp; Nurick LLC"&gt;&lt;img border="0" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/COPYRIGHT-TRADEMARKLAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/copyrightandtrademarklawblog/8_2D00_10_2D00_2011-2_2D00_39_2D00_19-PM.png" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-style:italic;"&gt;By&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mwn.com/dwatts" target="_blank" style="font-style:italic;"&gt;David M. Watts, Jr.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you are charitably inclined, there are tax-advantaged ways to make a gift to a favorite charity while enjoying the income from that gift for your lifetime. Many educational and charitable organizations offer plans that combine the benefits of an immediate income tax deduction and lifetime income from the charitable gift. In most cases, you can make the gift in cash or securities, and sometimes even with real estate. Here is a brief overview of the major types of deferred charitable gifts</description><author>McNees@placeholder.com (McNees Wallace &amp; Nurick LLC)</author><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 06:24:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>The John Edwards Case - What About Gift Taxes?</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/05/14/the-john-edwards-case-what-about-gift-taxes.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/05/14/the-john-edwards-case-what-about-gift-taxes.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a target="_blank" title="Gregory Herman-Giddens" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/ESTATE-ELDERLAW/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/estateplanningandprobateblog/Gregory-HGiddens.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/ESTATE-ELDERLAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/estateplanningandprobateblog/Gregory-HGiddens.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yesterday [May 8th] I blogged about North Carolina&amp;#39;s controversial Amendment One, which ended up passing by a large margin.&amp;nbsp; I also have some thoughts about another matter in the headlines - the John Edwards trial.&amp;nbsp; I have not been following the case closely, but I do know that central to the case is the money received in 2007 from wealthy donors Fred Baron and Bunny Mellon, Edward&amp;#39;s knowledge of the donations, and whether they constituted campaign funds or simply gifts.&amp;nbsp; Edwards former speechwriter Wendy</description><author>ghgiddens@trustcounselpa.com (Gregory Herman-Giddens)</author><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 07:52:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Morrison &amp; Foerster LLP: Gift Tax Planning Opportunities: The Window Is Closing</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/04/24/morrison-amp-foerster-llp-gift-tax-planning-opportunities-the-window-is-closing.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/04/24/morrison-amp-foerster-llp-gift-tax-planning-opportunities-the-window-is-closing.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p style="padding-left:180px;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;a title="Morrison &amp;amp; Foerster LLP" target="_blank" href="http://www.mofo.com/"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x1500/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/practitionerscorner/8_2D00_1_2D00_2010-10_2D00_01_2D00_06-PM.png" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;By &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.mofo.com/Genevieve-Moore"&gt;Genevieve M. Moore&lt;/a&gt; &amp;amp; &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.mofo.com/Richard-Kinyon"&gt;Richard S. Kinyon&lt;/a&gt;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.mofo.com/"&gt;Morrison &amp;amp; Foerster LLP&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As reported in
this space over the last several months, there has been unprecedented upheaval
in the federal transfer tax world in the last few years.&amp;nbsp; One element of this was the unexpected
increase in the federal gift and estate tax &amp;quot;applicable exclusion</description><author>MorrisonFoersterLLP@placeholder.com (Morrison and Foerster LLP)</author><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:58:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>New York Court of Appeals Revisits the Law of Gifting of Art or Other Objects </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/04/23/new-york-court-of-appeals-revisits-the-law-of-gifting-of-art-or-other-objects.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/04/23/new-york-court-of-appeals-revisits-the-law-of-gifting-of-art-or-other-objects.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;How does one gift an 1,100 pound
sculpture?&amp;nbsp; The New York Court of Appeals
recently revisited the law of gifts in the context of determining the validity
of such a gift by the deceased sculptor&amp;#39;s widow. &lt;i&gt;Mirvish v. Mott&lt;/i&gt;, 18 N.Y.3d 510, 2012 N.Y. LEXIS 266 (2012) [&lt;a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?app=00075&amp;amp;view=full&amp;amp;searchtype=get&amp;amp;search=2012%20N.Y.%20LEXIS%20266&amp;amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00266" target="_blank"&gt;enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers&lt;/a&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The
widow of the cubist sculptor Jacques Lipschitz purportedly made an &lt;i&gt;inter vivos &lt;/i&gt;gift of the sculpture &amp;quot;The
Cry,&amp;quot; cast in 1928, to her longtime companion Biond Fury.&amp;nbsp; Jacques Lipschitz died in 1973 at the age of
81, and Yulla, his wife, inherited many valuable works from her husband,
including &amp;quot;The Cry.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; After Jacques&amp;#39; death,
Yulla began a long-term relationship with Mr.&amp;nbsp;Fury, and they lived together
for seventeen years, until her death</description><author>PeterKelly@placeholder.com (Peter K. Kelly)</author><pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:02:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Legislative Protection for Charities Caught by Ponzi Clawbacks </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/04/16/legislative-protection-for-charities-caught-by-ponzi-clawbacks.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/04/16/legislative-protection-for-charities-caught-by-ponzi-clawbacks.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;On April 3, 2012, Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton signed a new law, Chapter 151, House File 1384, designed to protect nonprofits from having to pay back donations made by Ponzi perpetrators and other fraudulent sources.&amp;nbsp; The new law actually restricts a trustee&amp;#39;s recovery in three distinct ways.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First, it amends Minnesota Statutes &amp;sect; 513.41 to exempt charitable organizations from returning transfers made outside of a two year statute of limitations.&amp;nbsp; The current statute of limitation on fraudulent transfer lawsuits is six years.&amp;nbsp; The new statute effectively shortens the statute of limitations by amending the definition of a &amp;quot;transfer&amp;quot; to exclude any transfer more than two years before the commencement of the action, as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>kphelps@diamondmccarthy.com (Kathy Bazoian Phelps)</author><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:54:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Gift Tax and the Statute of Limitations</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/03/22/gift-tax-and-the-statute-of-limitations.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/03/22/gift-tax-and-the-statute-of-limitations.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ofplaw.com/profiles.htm?id=9" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img border="0" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/ESTATE-ELDERLAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/estateplanningandprobateblog/John-Dedon.png" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A U.S. Tax Court decision filed March 6&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;Dickerson v. Commissioner&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;[&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?app=00075&amp;amp;view=full&amp;amp;searchtype=get&amp;amp;search=2012%20Tax%20Ct.%20Memo%20LEXIS%2057&amp;amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00266"&gt;enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers&lt;/a&gt;], regarding a waitress who won $10 million in a lottery, is extremely relevant for gift tax law.&amp;nbsp; The waitress tried to shift the winnings to family members without incurring a taxable gift.&amp;nbsp; The IRS disagreed, claiming there was a gift, and the Tax Court concurred.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The relevance is not so much the facts of</description><author>john.dedon@ofplaw.com (John Dedon)</author><pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:22:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Morrison &amp; Foerster LLP: Charities, S Corporations and UBIT: Why a Charitable Gift of S Corporation Stock May Not Be the Best Option</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/02/28/morrison-foerster-llp-charities-s-corporations-and-ubit-why-a-charitable-gift-of-s-corporation-stock-may-not-be-the-best-option.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/02/28/morrison-foerster-llp-charities-s-corporations-and-ubit-why-a-charitable-gift-of-s-corporation-stock-may-not-be-the-best-option.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p style="padding-left:180px;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mofo.com/" target="_blank" title="Morrison Foerster Logo"&gt;&lt;img border="0" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x1500/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/practitionerscorner/8_2D00_1_2D00_2010-10_2D00_01_2D00_06-PM.png" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;strong&gt;By &lt;a href="http://www.mofo.com/Danielle-Zaragoza" target="_blank"&gt;Danielle T. Zaragoza&lt;/a&gt;,
Esq., &lt;a href="http://www.mofo.com/" target="_blank"&gt;Morrison &amp;amp;
Foerster LLP&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;Not all charitable gifts are created equal, and a charity is
not required to accept any and all donations of property, especially property
that may be difficult to own or liquidate in furtherance of the charity&amp;#39;s
purpose.&amp;nbsp; For instance, before a charity
accepts</description><author>MorrisonFoersterLLP@placeholder.com (Morrison and Foerster LLP)</author><pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:15:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Substantiating Charitable Deductions</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/02/03/substantiating-charitable-deductions.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/02/03/substantiating-charitable-deductions.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;&lt;a title="John Dedon Photo" target="_blank" href="http://www.ofplaw.com/profiles.htm?id=9"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/ESTATE-ELDERLAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/estateplanningandprobateblog/John-Dedon.png" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;Taxpayers who claim income tax deductions for charitable 
contributions must request and obtain the written acknowledgement from 
the charity that the contribution was made. It is due by April 17, 2012,
 the time the income tax return is filed. Failure to have the required 
substantiation from the charity can void the tax deduction. Below is a 
sample letter.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;
&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;CHARITY NAME&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;
&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;____[Date]_______&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>john.dedon@ofplaw.com (John Dedon)</author><pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:11:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>No Good Deed Goes Unpunished: Kent State Alumnus Withdraws Gift after Student Newspaper Raises SEC Questions </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/01/11/no-good-deed-goes-unpunished-kent-state-alumnus-withdraws-gift-after-student-newspaper-raises-sec-questions.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/01/11/no-good-deed-goes-unpunished-kent-state-alumnus-withdraws-gift-after-student-newspaper-raises-sec-questions.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As reported
by &lt;a href="http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2012/01/kent_state_university_alumnus.html" target="_blank"&gt;Cleveland.com/The Plain Dealer&lt;/a&gt;, Kent State alumnus, Jason
Cope, recently withdrew his $1 million gift to Kent State University after the
student newspaper brought to light Cope&amp;#39;s investigation by the SEC. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://kentwired.com/cope-court-donor-withdraws-$1-million-gift/" target="_blank"&gt;Kentwire.com&lt;/a&gt; reported that Cope was associated with a
financial firm that defrauded 190 investors of $8.7 million in 1999/2000. In &lt;i&gt;SEC v. Milan Capital Group, Inc.&lt;/i&gt;, 2001
U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11804 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 14, 2001) [&lt;a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?app=00075&amp;amp;view=full&amp;amp;searchtype=get&amp;amp;search=2001%20U.S.%20Dist.%20LEXIS%2011804&amp;amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00266" target="_blank"&gt;enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers&lt;/a&gt;], Cope, along with several other defendants,
was found jointly and severally liable for $19 million in illicit</description><author>LexisNexisStaffEstateElder@placeholder.com (LexisNexis Estate and Elder Law Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:31:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Qualified Conservation Contributions under IRC § 170(h) - McLaughlin on Kaufman: Protecting Public Investment in Conservation Easements </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/01/10/Qualified-Conservation-Contributions-under-IRC-_A700_-170_2800_h_2900_-_2D00_-McLaughlin-on-Kaufman_3A00_-Protecting-Public-Investment-in-Conservation-Easements-.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/01/10/Qualified-Conservation-Contributions-under-IRC-_A700_-170_2800_h_2900_-_2D00_-McLaughlin-on-Kaufman_3A00_-Protecting-Public-Investment-in-Conservation-Easements-.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;McLaughlin on Kaufman: Protecting Public Investment in Conservation Easements
                &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The
conservation purpose of a conservation easement will be &amp;quot;protected in
perpetuity&amp;quot; only if the holder has an absolute right to a share of
post-extinguishment proceeds. The donor&amp;#39;s lender cannot be given priority
rights to such proceeds. So the Tax Court held in &lt;i&gt;Kaufman v. Comm&amp;#39;r&lt;/i&gt;. In this Analysis, Nancy A. McLaughlin discusses
the import of this decision, including the court&amp;#39;s approach to penalties and
the deductibility of cash payments made to the donee.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>NancyMcLaughlin@placeholder.com (Nancy A. McLaughlin)</author><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:13:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Federal Government Access to Real Estate Transfer Information</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/01/04/federal-government-access-to-real-estate-transfer-information.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/01/04/federal-government-access-to-real-estate-transfer-information.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;&lt;i&gt;By &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.rmfpc.com/attorneyProfile.cfm?ID=36"&gt;Adam J. Gottlieb&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;There are many positives of the information and
technological advances that private citizens have enjoyed over the past several
decades. For example, we can now access information at break-neck speed on our
handheld phones. We can watch a movie on a very small electronic device. We can
search for and find information that we could only dream of finding twenty
years ago.&amp;nbsp; But just as we can find all
these wonderful things out there in the world using technology, so can the federal
government. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;The state and local governments have for many years tracked
transfers of real property. Normally and for many decades, a transferor and a
transferee of real property have been required to file with state or local
governments certain</description><author>AdamGottlieb@placeholder.com (Adam J. Gottlieb)</author><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:58:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Gifting in 2012</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/01/02/gifting-in-2012.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/estate-elderlaw/blogs/giftsandcharity/archive/2012/01/02/gifting-in-2012.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;By:&amp;nbsp;
David R. Schoenhaar, Esq.*
&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;2011 is coming
to a close and the generous tax laws that went into effect on January 1, 2011
reunifying the estate, gift and GST exemption amounts to $5,000,000 are creating
renewed interests in lifetime gifting.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;As discussed in
a previous Blog, the sweeping legislation increased the gift tax exemption
amount by $4,000,000 (from the previous exemption amount of $1,000,000),
significantly expanding one&amp;#39;s ability to make lifetime transfers without
incurring a gift tax.&amp;nbsp; An overlooked
provision of the new law is that the exemption amounts are subject to
adjustments for inflation for those years beyond 2011.&amp;nbsp; This is good news for those able to make
significant gifts in 2012 as the gift tax exemption amount increases an
additional $120,000 to $5,120,000 starting January 1, 2012.&amp;nbsp; Now a couple</description><author>DavidSchoenhaar@lexisnexis.com (David R. Schoenhaar)</author><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 07:49:00 -0400</pubDate></item></channel></rss>