﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../StyleSheet/rss.xsl"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Immigration Law Outside News</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/immigration-law</link><description>The platform that enables you to build rich, interactive communities</description><copyright>http://www.lexisnexis.com/terms/copyright.aspx</copyright><atom:link href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/immigration-law/Rss.aspx?id=493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Where Individuals Enter ICE Custody: State-by-State Details</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/20/where-individuals-enter-ice-custody-state-by-state-details.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/20/where-individuals-enter-ice-custody-state-by-state-details.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;On a typical work day Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) took 1,509 individuals into custody, according to the latest available ICE data from November and December 2012. During weekends, the volume of detentions decreased to an average of 471 people a day placed in ICE custody. This means that nearly 8,500 individuals were picked up across the country and detained by ICE during a typical week.[1] If activity levels continue at this pace, ICE will detain around 400,000 individuals during the current fiscal year. &amp;nbsp;This report focuses on where these individuals were first detained by ICE based on their initial custody locations.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;- &lt;strong&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://trac.syr.edu/immigration/reports/319/" target="_blank"&gt;TRAC, May 20, 2013&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>skiramen@gmail.com (Daniel M. Kowalski)</author><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:13:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>A Family Divided</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/20/a-family-divided.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/20/a-family-divided.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.azcentral.com/news/politics/articles/20130515immigration-reform-border-divided-prog.html"&gt;Arizona Republic three-day series&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;: &amp;quot;For almost six years, Ivonne Gil has lived apart from her husband, Mario Gil, and their 13-year-old son, Daniel, on opposite sides of the border. She was deported in 2007 and hasn&amp;rsquo;t been able to return legally to the U.S. since. &amp;nbsp;Mario and Daniel drive to Nogales every weekend to visit Ivonne. Their family&amp;#39;s separation has taken a toll on the couple&amp;#39;s marriage and disrupted their son&amp;#39;s life. &amp;nbsp;But they hope one day soon that Ivonne will be able to return to the U.S. legally, possibly benefitting from an immigration bill introduced in the U.S. Senate in April by a group that includes Arizona Republicans John McCain and Jeff Flake.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www</description><author>skiramen@gmail.com (Daniel M. Kowalski)</author><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:10:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>16 Years Ago Today, U.S. Marines Shot and Killed a U.S. Citizen on American Soil</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/20/16-years-ago-today-u-s-marines-shot-and-killed-a-u-s-citizen-on-american-soil.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/20/16-years-ago-today-u-s-marines-shot-and-killed-a-u-s-citizen-on-american-soil.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Every year on or about May 20th I remind readers: &amp;quot;In 1997, U.S. Marines patrolling the Texas-Mexican border as part of the war on drugs shot and killed Esequiel Hern&amp;aacute;ndez, Jr.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Mistaken for a drug runner, &lt;strong&gt;the 18 year old was, in fact, a U.S. citizen&lt;/strong&gt; tending his family&amp;#39;s goats with a .22 rifle.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;He became the first American killed by U.S. military forces on native soil since the 1970 Kent State shootings&lt;/strong&gt;.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; This PBS DVD is a must-view for all who care about our border policies. -&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.pbs.org/pov/ballad/"&gt;http://www.pbs.org/pov/ballad/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.pbs.org/pov/film-images/ballad_480x395_esequiel.jpg" border="0" style="max-height:550px;max-width:550px;" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>skiramen@gmail.com (Daniel M. Kowalski)</author><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:27:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Sen. Franken Helps Small Businesses and Regular Folks with the I-9 Process</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/20/sen-franken-helps-small-businesses-and-regular-folks-with-the-i-9-process.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/20/sen-franken-helps-small-businesses-and-regular-folks-with-the-i-9-process.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;[H]&lt;span&gt;e persuaded his colleagues on the Senate Judiciary Committee to adopt by voice vote an amendment (Franken 4) to the Gang of Eight&amp;#39;s comprehensive immigration reform (CIR) bill, S. 744. &amp;nbsp;If CIR is enacted with Franken 4 included, it would establish within U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) an &amp;quot;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/legislation/immigration/amendments/Franken/Franken4-(ARM13606).pdf"&gt;Office of the Small Business and Employee Advocate&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;quot; (the SBE Advocate), whose purpose would be to &amp;quot;assist small businesses [firms with 49 or fewer employees] and individuals in complying with the [Form I-9 (employment-eligibility-verification) requirements&amp;quot; of the immigration laws, &amp;quot;including the resolution of conflicts arising in the course of attempted compliance with such requirements.&amp;quot;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The new role for the SBE Advocate complements the&amp;nbsp;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http</description><author>skiramen@gmail.com (Daniel M. Kowalski)</author><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:20:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Day Laborer Victory in Texas: Jornaleros v. League City </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/20/day-laborer-victory-in-texas-jornaleros-v-league-city.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/20/day-laborer-victory-in-texas-jornaleros-v-league-city.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;This case brought under 42 U.S.C. &amp;sect; 1983 was tried to the court on September 24-28, 2012. The parties consented to the jurisdiction of this magistrate judge for all purposes, including final judgment (Dkt. 18). At issue is League City&amp;#39;s alleged policy of targeting day laborers and applying (and mis-applying) state laws to prevent them from soliciting employment in the city. Plaintiff Jornaleros de Las Palmas, an association of League City day laborers, seeks declaratory and permanent injunctive relief, but not monetary damages. Plaintiff sues under &amp;sect; 1983 for a declaratory judgment that Texas Transportation Code &amp;sect; 552.007(a) is an unconstitutional restraint on its members&amp;#39; First Amendment rights to free speech, both on its face and as applied by defendants. Plaintiff also sues for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment and for race and national origin discrimination in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. ... To summarize, in 2009 League City began</description><author>skiramen@gmail.com (Daniel M. Kowalski)</author><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:02:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Alabama Immigration Law Asks Doctors For Their Papers</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/18/alabama-immigration-law-asks-doctors-for-their-papers.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/18/alabama-immigration-law-asks-doctors-for-their-papers.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Some Alabama physicians and physician assistants were surprised this week to receive a letter with a new demand from the Alabama Board of Medical Examiners: Show us your papers. &amp;nbsp;Under the state&amp;#39;s 2011 immigration law, these medical professionals are now required to prove they are U.S. citizens or in the country legally to maintain their licenses to practice, according to the&amp;nbsp;&lt;a target="_hplink" href="http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/Boardcitizenshipletter.pdf"&gt;letter&lt;/a&gt;, dated May 16.&amp;quot; - &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/18/alabama-immigration-law_n_3295255.html"&gt;Elise Foley, May 18, 2013&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>skiramen@gmail.com (Daniel M. Kowalski)</author><pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 17:43:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>MPI Report Examines Credential-Recognition Barriers Immigrant Professionals Face</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/17/mpi-report-examines-credential-recognition-barriers-immigrant-professionals-face.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/17/mpi-report-examines-credential-recognition-barriers-immigrant-professionals-face.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;span&gt;Foreign-trained professionals in the United States often encounter significant obstacles on their path to professional practice, among them difficulties in demonstrating the value of their past work experience and qualifications. Many must be formally recertified in the United States before they can legally practice their profession.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because of the United States&amp;rsquo; decentralized federal syste&lt;a id="_GoBack" name="_GoBack"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;m, no single structure governs professional certification in regulated occupations &amp;mdash; resulting in a profusion of overlapping and sometimes contradictory national, state and local rules and exams that are often costly, complicated and time-consuming for immigrant professionals to navigate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A new Migration Policy Institute report,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.migrationpolicy.org/pubs/UScredentialrecognition.pdf"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Credential Recognition in the United States for Foreign Professionals&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;em&gt;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;examines the U</description><author>skiramen@gmail.com (Daniel M. Kowalski)</author><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:21:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Scholars to Senate: Grassley Amendment 53 Unconstitutional</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/17/scholars-to-senate-grassley-amendment-53-unconstitutional.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/17/scholars-to-senate-grassley-amendment-53-unconstitutional.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;As law professors and scholars of constitutional and immigration law, we urge you to oppose Senator Grassley&amp;rsquo;s Amendment 53, the &amp;ldquo;Keep Our Communities Safe Act of 2013.&amp;rdquo; &amp;nbsp;The amendment is unconstitutional because it would require prolonged detention without a bond hearing for many people with pending immigration proceedings, and because it would permit the Department of Homeland Security to indefinitely detain many people who cannot be deported.&amp;quot; -&amp;nbsp;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.aclu.org/files/assets/grassley_53_law_professors_letter_final.pdf"&gt;67 leading constitutional and immigration law professors and scholars, May 15, 2013&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>skiramen@gmail.com (Daniel M. Kowalski)</author><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 12:22:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Traffic Stops Become Immigration Stops in Delaware Valley</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/17/traffic-stops-become-immigration-stops-in-delaware-valley.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/17/traffic-stops-become-immigration-stops-in-delaware-valley.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;[T]raffic operations designed to catch unlicensed drivers are provoking allegations of racial profiling across the Delaware Valley. &amp;nbsp;The concerns stem from ICE officers working hand-in-hand with local police, which immigrant rights advocates say is an end-run around state and federal law specifically prohibiting police from enforcing immigration laws. &amp;nbsp;According to citation records obtained by a public records request, 60 percent of the nearly 100 drivers ticketed by the Norristown Police Department during two checkpoints conducted jointly with ICE last summer had Hispanic surnames. &amp;nbsp;These figures are particularly striking given that Hispanic residents make up only 30 percent of Norristown&amp;#39;s population, according to the 2010 Census. ...&amp;nbsp;ICE&amp;#39;s regional office confirms they have participated in ten traffic checkpoints in 2012 within its area of responsibility. &amp;nbsp;That region covers Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Delaware. ...&amp;nbsp;Back in Norristown</description><author>skiramen@gmail.com (Daniel M. Kowalski)</author><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 11:33:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>American Wins Ten-Year Battle For Citizenship [UPDATED]</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/16/american-wins-ten-year-battle-for-citizenship.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/16/american-wins-ten-year-battle-for-citizenship.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Nothing, not the threat of deportation, not the ensuing 10-year legal battle, not even six years in the Batavia detention center, made Carlos Garcia waver. &amp;nbsp;Even while representing himself &amp;ndash; he didn&amp;rsquo;t get a lawyer until a federal appeals court appointed one eight years into his case &amp;ndash; he never gave up on his dream of becoming a U.S. citizen. &amp;nbsp;Three weeks ago, federal immigration officials finally relented and, after a decade-long battle to deport Garcia, reversed themselves and agreed to grant him citizenship.&amp;quot; - &lt;strong&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.buffalonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20130515%2FCITYANDREGION%2F130519374%2F1002" target="_blank"&gt;Buffalo News, May 16, 2013&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2009 court decision &lt;strong&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://db.tt/fFjXDXQn" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2011 court decision &lt;strong&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style=</description><author>skiramen@gmail.com (Daniel M. Kowalski)</author><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 18:07:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>You Have NOT Been Unsubscribed!</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/15/you-have-not-been-unsubscribed.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/15/you-have-not-been-unsubscribed.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Sad to say, a &amp;#39;server error&amp;#39; resulted in no email for the past two days from the ILC. &amp;nbsp;Techs in the basement (or the cloud?) tell me the problem should be fixed and today&amp;#39;s email blast should be distributed as usual. &amp;nbsp;Fingers crossed...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://chrisjpowell.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/SnafuMS_0277.jpg" border="0" style="max-height:550px;max-width:550px;" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>skiramen@gmail.com (Daniel M. Kowalski)</author><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 11:56:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>DOJ Remands Another DHS 'DOMA Denial'</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/14/doj-remands-another-dhs-doma-denial.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/14/doj-remands-another-dhs-doma-denial.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Just before Mother&amp;rsquo;s Day this North Carolina family learned that the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) rejected the denial of the marriage-based green card petition they had filed last year. The BIA sent the case back to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Field Office in Charlotte, North Carolina for further processing with orders to conduct complete fact-finding, including an interview, to determine whether they would be eligible for a green card if not for Section 3 of DOMA. This is the thirteenth time that a married same-sex binational couple, participating in The DOMA Project&amp;rsquo;s pro bono legal challenge to DOMA, has received a &amp;ldquo;remand&amp;rdquo; from the BIA after the USCIS denied their green card case because of DOMA.&amp;quot; - &lt;strong&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.domaproject.org/2013/05/mothers-day-present-for-north-carolina-lesbian-couple-bia-rejects-uscis-doma-denial-of-green-card-petition</description><author>skiramen@gmail.com (Daniel M. Kowalski)</author><pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 13:06:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Rep. Frederica Wilson Saves the Day!</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/14/rep-frederica-wilson-saves-the-day.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/14/rep-frederica-wilson-saves-the-day.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;It was just after 9 p.m. Monday. Rep. Frederica Wilson, the Miami Democrat who hosted the forum, was floored. &amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;Oh my God,&amp;rdquo; she said. &amp;ldquo;Four a.m., in the morning? Why are you just telling us? We could have helped you perhaps. It&amp;rsquo;s too late.&amp;rdquo; Someone from the audience of 200 or so citizens at Haitian Evangelical Baptist Church chimed in: &amp;ldquo;It&amp;rsquo;s never too late.&amp;rdquo; &amp;nbsp;It wasn&amp;rsquo;t. &amp;nbsp;Wilson ultimately delivered, rousting an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) official out of bed and getting the deportation of Rene Rivas, an undocumented immigrant and father of four, stopped with just a few hours to spare. ... &amp;ldquo;We get cases like this every day. Every day,&amp;rdquo; Wilson said. &amp;nbsp;&amp;quot;It&amp;rsquo;s like this is all my office does,&amp;quot; she said. &amp;quot;It&amp;rsquo;s immigration. Immigration. It tops veterans&amp;rsquo; issues. Prisons. Housing. Everything. It&amp;rsquo;s immigration.&amp;rdquo; &amp;nbsp;One reason for that is the</description><author>skiramen@gmail.com (Daniel M. Kowalski)</author><pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 13:01:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>CFR and Cato on Border Management</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/14/cfr-and-cato-on-border-management.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/14/cfr-and-cato-on-border-management.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.cfr.org/immigration/managing-illegal-immigration-united-states/p30658"&gt;Managing Illegal Immigration to the United States: How Effective Is Enforcement?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; - &amp;quot;The authors examine U.S. efforts to prevent illegal immigration to the United States. Although the United States has witnessed a sharp drop in illegal border crossings in the past decade alongside an enormous increase in government activities to prevent illegal immigration, there remains little understanding of the role enforcement has played. Better data and analyses to assist lawmakers in crafting more successful policies and to support administration officials in implementing these policies are long overdue.&amp;quot; - &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.cfr.org/immigration/managing-illegal-immigration-united-states/p30658"&gt;Council on Foreign Relations Press, May 2013&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span</description><author>skiramen@gmail.com (Daniel M. Kowalski)</author><pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 11:02:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Do We Still Need PERM? - The Merits-Based Points System in BSEOIMA</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/13/do-we-still-need-perm-the-merits-based-points-system-in-bseoima.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/13/do-we-still-need-perm-the-merits-based-points-system-in-bseoima.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;quot;We continue to analyze the provisions of the&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/s744/text"&gt;Border Security, Economic Opportunity and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013, s. 744&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;(BSEOIMA), which seeks to bring about dramatic changes to the existing immigration system in the United States. &amp;nbsp;One of the most &amp;nbsp;transformative changes that BSEOIMA will bring, if enacted, is a merits-based points system.&amp;quot; - &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://blog.cyrusmehta.com/2013/05/do-we-still-need-perm-labor.html"&gt;Gary Endelman &amp;amp; Cyrus D. Mehta, May 13, 2013&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>skiramen@gmail.com (Daniel M. Kowalski)</author><pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 12:10:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Members of Congress, Meet the Campbells!</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/13/members-of-congress-meet-the-campbells.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/13/members-of-congress-meet-the-campbells.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Let me tell you a little about Jio&amp;rsquo;s history.&amp;nbsp; Try to put yourself in her place. She was born in Mexico, and&amp;nbsp;was brought&amp;nbsp;across the border to the U.S. by her parents at the age of 3.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;A few&amp;nbsp;years later,&amp;nbsp;her uncle died in the U.S., and her parents wanted to bury him in Mexico.&amp;nbsp; So they brought Jio to Mexico with them for a few months, and then crossed her back to the U.S.&amp;nbsp; Surely, no one would&amp;nbsp;want to penalize a young child for unlawfully entering the U.S. with her parents.&amp;nbsp; Right? &amp;nbsp;Fast forward to age 23.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Jio is a senior at one of the Cal State universities.&amp;nbsp; She is also a Marathoner and an All-American Girl. ...&amp;nbsp;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://shusterman.com/newsletterusimmigrationfebruary2013.html#5"&gt;The rest of the story was told by Jio in her&amp;nbsp;narrative of her 16 months in Mexico&lt;/a&gt;, or&amp;nbsp;if not,&amp;nbsp;you&amp;rsquo;ll have to wait for the movie &amp;nbsp; Suffice to say that on January 5</description><author>skiramen@gmail.com (Daniel M. Kowalski)</author><pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 11:44:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>No Time for Rich-Whining, CIR Advocates Must Stay Focused on the Senate</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/13/no-time-for-rich-whining-cir-advocates-must-stay-focused-on-the-senate.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/13/no-time-for-rich-whining-cir-advocates-must-stay-focused-on-the-senate.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;The point of this post is not that revelry over the fall of xenophobes and eugenicists is wrong; rather, it is that celebrations of that sort are unaffordable luxuries. That wine is just too rich at this late hour. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Advocates for enlightened CIR must instead keep eyes peeled on the Senate Judiciary Committee and its fast-and-furious consideration of amendments which will profoundly reshape in ways unforeseeable the rules for employment- and family-based immigration. &amp;nbsp;This week&amp;#39;s action will focus on Title IV which would transform (in good and bad ways) many of the most heavily-used nonimmigrant visa categories and create new classifications whose contours will be decided in the coming weeks, perhaps as soon as Memorial Day.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So save your gloating for another day. &amp;nbsp;Now, keep the Congressional feet to the fire. Let the word go out in Twitter feed and Facebook update, in radio/TV talk shows on cable, broadcast and satellite networks, in blog</description><author>skiramen@gmail.com (Daniel M. Kowalski)</author><pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 11:38:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Federal Judge Grants Preliminary Approval of Settlement Agreement in National Class Action Lawsuit on Work Authorization for Asylum Seekers</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/10/federal-judge-grants-preliminary-approval-of-settlement-agreement-in-national-class-action-lawsuit-on-work-authorization-for-asylum-seekers.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/10/federal-judge-grants-preliminary-approval-of-settlement-agreement-in-national-class-action-lawsuit-on-work-authorization-for-asylum-seekers.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://nwirp.org/news/viewmediarelease.aspx?PressReleaseID=60" target="_blank"&gt;NWIRP, May 8, 2013&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; - &amp;quot;&lt;span&gt;On May 8, 2013, a federal district court issued an order preliminarily approving a settlement agreement in a nationwide class action lawsuit that challenged the denial of work authorization to asylum seekers who have been waiting six months or more for a decision on their asylum applications. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;The lawsuit is called B.H. et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al(also referred to as &amp;ldquo;ABT&amp;rdquo;). &amp;nbsp;This lawsuit was filed by the American Immigration Council&amp;rsquo;s Legal Action Center (LAC), the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project (NWIRP), Massachusetts Law Reform Institute (MLRI, and the law firm Gibbs Houston Pauw. &amp;nbsp;As the Notice to Class explains, individuals have 30 days to submit written objections to the settlement. &amp;nbsp;The Notice to class</description><author>skiramen@gmail.com (Daniel M. Kowalski)</author><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 14:47:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Southern District of Texas Leading in Record Year for Immigration Prosecutions</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/10/southern-district-of-texas-leading-in-record-year-for-immigration-prosecutions.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/10/southern-district-of-texas-leading-in-record-year-for-immigration-prosecutions.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://trac.syr.edu/whatsnew/email.130509.html"&gt;TRAC, May 10, 2013&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; - &amp;quot;Very timely Justice Department data show that during the first six months of FY 2013, the rate of federal criminal prosecutions for immigration offenses is up 9.8 percent over the previous year, with 50,468 such prosecutions reported as of the end of March. If this pace continues, more individuals will have faced criminal immigration charges this year than at any other time in United States history.&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regionally, the Southern District of Texas (Houston) now leads the nation with 17,022 immigration prosecutions so far this year. The Western District of Texas (San Antonio) is in second place with 13,379 prosecutions. Arizona, the district with the most immigration prosecutions in FY 2012, has slipped to third place with 11,476. Arizona is also recording the largest decline -- 22 percent -- of any district in</description><author>skiramen@gmail.com (Daniel M. Kowalski)</author><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 10:20:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Biometric Database of All Adult Americans Hidden in Immigration Reform</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/10/biometric-database-of-all-adult-americans-hidden-in-immigration-reform.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/10/biometric-database-of-all-adult-americans-hidden-in-immigration-reform.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;The immigration reform measure the Senate began debating yesterday would create a national biometric database of virtually every adult in the U.S., in what privacy groups fear could be the first step to a ubiquitous national identification system.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Buried in the more than&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/legislation/EAS13500toMDM13313redline.pdf"&gt;800 pages of the bipartisan legislation&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;(.pdf)&amp;nbsp; is language mandating the creation of the innocuously-named &amp;ldquo;photo tool,&amp;rdquo; a massive federal database administered by the Department of Homeland Security and containing names, ages, Social Security numbers and photographs of everyone in the country with a driver&amp;rsquo;s license or other state-issued photo ID.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Employers would be obliged to look up every new hire in the database to verify that they match their photo.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This piece of the Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act is aimed at curbing employment</description><author>skiramen@gmail.com (Daniel M. Kowalski)</author><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 09:55:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>USCIS to Expand Entrepreneurs in Residence Initiative</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/09/uscis-to-expand-entrepreneurs-in-residence-initiative.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/09/uscis-to-expand-entrepreneurs-in-residence-initiative.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=2b6be424ac48e310VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&amp;amp;vgnextchannel=68439c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1RCRD"&gt;USCIS, May 8, 2013&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;: &amp;quot;&lt;span&gt;In just over one year, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services&amp;rsquo; (USCIS) innovative&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.eb1d4c2a3e5b9ac89243c6a7543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=d44eee876cb85310VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&amp;amp;vgnextchannel=d44eee876cb85310VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD"&gt;Entrepreneurs in Residence&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;(EIR) initiative has produced real benefits that will strengthen agency policies and practices relating to job-creating immigrant entrepreneurs who help advance American economic growth. USCIS Director Alejandro Mayorkas will discuss the EIR team&amp;rsquo;s&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/About</description><author>skiramen@gmail.com (Daniel M. Kowalski)</author><pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 12:43:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Meet the Expert: Stephen W. Yale-Loehr</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/09/meet-the-expert-stephen-w-yale-loehr.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/09/meet-the-expert-stephen-w-yale-loehr.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Attorney &lt;strong&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://millermayer.com/members/stephen-w-yale-loehr.html" target="_blank"&gt;Stephen W. Yale-Loehr&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;, co-author of&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/store/catalog/booktemplate/productdetail.jsp?pageName=relatedProducts&amp;amp;prodId=10420" target="_blank"&gt;Immigration Law and Procedure&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;, the 21-Volume &amp;#39;Bible&amp;#39; of immigration law that has been cited in over 300 federal court decisions in cases from across the U.S. circuit courts of appeals, federal district courts, and the U.S. Supreme Court, was quoted recently in &lt;strong&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2013/may/07/marco-rubio/marco-rubio-says-obama-shows-reluctance-enforc/" target="_blank"&gt;Politico&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; and the &lt;strong&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;a href="http</description><author>skiramen@gmail.com (Daniel M. Kowalski)</author><pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 12:23:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>A Description of the Immigrant Population - 2013 Update</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/09/a-description-of-the-immigrant-population-2013-update.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/09/a-description-of-the-immigrant-population-2013-update.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;span&gt;CBO has updated the information in its June 2011 report&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;A Description of the Immigrant Population: An Update&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span&gt;. &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.cbo.gov/publication/44134"&gt;CBO updated 15 of the 20 exhibits&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; contained in that report and added one new exhibit. Those exhibits that could be updated in their entirety have been, and a few others have been updated partially. In some instances, the period covered was altered to focus on the time span since the previous report. CBO&amp;rsquo;s updated exhibits regarding the immigrant population, along with a list of the agency&amp;rsquo;s recent reports and selected recent cost estimates for legislation related to immigration, accompany a &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/44134_Description_of_Immigrant_Population.pdf"&gt;letter to Congressman Paul Ryan&lt;</description><author>skiramen@gmail.com (Daniel M. Kowalski)</author><pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 11:57:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Report: Fearing Police Links to ICE, Latinos Less Likely to Report Crimes</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/07/report-fearing-police-links-to-ice-latinos-less-likely-to-report-crimes.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/07/report-fearing-police-links-to-ice-latinos-less-likely-to-report-crimes.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Many Latinos say they are less likely than before to report crimes because local police are increasingly involved in enforcing immigration laws, leading to a sharp increase in deportations, according to a new study. &amp;nbsp;About 44% of Latinos surveyed said they were less likely now to contact police if they were victims of a crime because they fear officers will inquire about their immigration status or the status of people they know. &amp;nbsp;The figure jumps to 70% among Latinos who are in the country unlawfully. &amp;nbsp;&amp;ldquo;There is fear that is really widespread,&amp;rdquo; said Nik Theodore, an associate professor of urban planning and policy at University of Illinois at Chicago and the author of the study. &amp;nbsp;The report, &amp;ldquo;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/139923110/Insecure-Communities-Latino-Perception-of-Police-Involvement-in-Immigration-Enforcement"&gt;Insecure Communities: Latino Perceptions of Police Involvement</description><author>skiramen@gmail.com (Daniel M. Kowalski)</author><pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 13:38:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Conservatives Battle Over CIR Narrative</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/07/conservatives-battle-over-cir-narrative.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/blogs/outside/archive/2013/05/07/conservatives-battle-over-cir-narrative.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A &lt;strong&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/05/the-fiscal-cost-of-unlawful-immigrants-and-amnesty-to-the-us-taxpayer"&gt;new report&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; from the conservative Heritage Foundation claims immigration reform would cost the nation trillions of dollars.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yet in 2006 the Foundation argued &lt;strong&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://thinkprogress.org/immigration/2013/05/06/1970061/heritage-vs-heritage-major-immigration-report-released-today-directly-contradicts-its-2006-study/"&gt;precisely the opposite&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And the Cato Institute argues persuasively that the methodology of the Heritage report renders it &lt;strong&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.cato.org/blog/heritages-flawed-immigration-analysis"&gt;worthless&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WaPo recaps the give-and-take &lt;strong&gt;&lt;i</description><author>skiramen@gmail.com (Daniel M. Kowalski)</author><pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 12:56:00 -0400</pubDate></item></channel></rss>