﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../StyleSheet/rss.xsl"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Insurance Law Community Property Insurance</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/insurancelaw</link><description /><copyright>http://www.lexisnexis.com/terms/copyright.aspx</copyright><atom:link href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/insurancelaw/Rss.aspx?id=525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Massachusetts Rejects “In For One, In for All” Theory in Title Insurance Coverage</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2013/04/29/massachusetts-rejects-in-for-one-in-for-all-theory-in-title-insurance-coverage.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2013/04/29/massachusetts-rejects-in-for-one-in-for-all-theory-in-title-insurance-coverage.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://vetsteinlawgroup.com/"&gt;&lt;img height="144" width="550" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/taxlaw/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Tax_2C00_+Estates_2C00_+Corp/Vetstein-Logo-Header.jpg" border="0" style="max-width:550px;border:0;" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://vetsteinlawgroup.com/attorneys-vetstein-law-group-richard-vetstein/"&gt;Richard D. Vetstein, ESQ&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One little mistake in drafting and recording legal documents during a refinance can result in a huge problem for a lender - such as the lender having no legal ability to enforce the mortgage! (A slight problem..) GMAC Mortgage learned this the hard way at the Supreme Judicial Court in &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;GMAC Mortgage v. First American Title Insurance Company&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (SJC-11161) [&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?app=00075&amp;amp;view=full&amp;amp;searchtype=get&amp;amp;search=2013+Mass.+LEXIS+60&amp;amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00205"&gt;enhanced</description><author>VetsteinLawGroup@placeholder.com (Vetstein Law Group, P.C. )</author><pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:25:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Insurer Need Only Respond to Risk It Agreed to Insure</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2013/04/18/insurer-need-only-respond-to-risk-it-agreed-to-insure.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2013/04/18/insurer-need-only-respond-to-risk-it-agreed-to-insure.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Author+Thumbnails/Barry-Zalma.jpg" border="0" style="max-width:550px;" alt="" /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;b&gt;By Barry Zalma, Attorney and Consultant&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In &lt;i&gt;Seneca Insurance Company, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent v. Cimran Co., Inc., et al., Defendants-Respondents-Appellants.&lt;/i&gt;, No. 9226 (N.Y.App.Div. 04/09/2013), [&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?app=00075&amp;amp;view=full&amp;amp;searchtype=get&amp;amp;search=2013+N.Y.+App.+Div.+LEXIS+2292&amp;amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00204"&gt;enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers&lt;/a&gt;], the parties brought an appeal that provided the New York Appellate Division with the opportunity to reiterate and reaffirm an ancient principle of insurance law: that insurance coverage cannot be imposed based on liability for which insurance was not purchased or provided.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;It is axiomatic that insurance</description><author>zalma@zalma.com (Barry Zalma)</author><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:15:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 Amendments to Flood Disaster Protection Act</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2013/04/17/flood-insurance-reform-act-of-2012-amendments-to-flood-disaster-protection-act.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2013/04/17/flood-insurance-reform-act-of-2012-amendments-to-flood-disaster-protection-act.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Insurance+LC+Images/ILC-Hurricanne-Flooded-House.jpg" border="0" style="max-width:550px;" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;By the Ballard Spahr LLP Mortgage Banking Group&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The federal banking agencies, together with the Farm Credit Administration, have issued joint guidance on amendments to the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (FDPA). The amendments were part of the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 (Act), enacted on July 6, 2012. Participating in the guidance were the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Comptroller of the Currency, and the National Credit Union Administration.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.ballardspahr.com/~/media/Files/Alerts/2013-04-03-FDIC.pdf"&gt;Financial Institution Letter 14-2013&lt;/a&gt;, the agencies state that the Act&amp;#39;s increased penalties for FDPA violations</description><author>BallardSpahr@placeholder.com (Ballard Spahr LLP)</author><pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 22:43:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Title Insurer Underwriter Not Liable for Agent's Negligence Title Search</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2013/03/08/title-insurer-underwriter-not-liable-for-agent-s-negligence-title-search.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2013/03/08/title-insurer-underwriter-not-liable-for-agent-s-negligence-title-search.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/ESTATE-ELDERLAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/practitionerscorner/7_2D00_5_2D00_2011-2_2D00_54_2D00_45-PM.png" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;By &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.ballardspahr.com/People/Attorneys/Scott_Robert"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;Robert A. Scott &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/realestatelawblog/deed.jpg" border="0" style="border:0;float:right;margin:3px;" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style</description><author>BallardSpahr@placeholder.com (Ballard Spahr LLP)</author><pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 15:38:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Perkins Coie LLP on Court Confirms $20M Settlement with Louisiana Citizens for Late Claim Payments After Hurricanes Katrina and Rita</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2013/02/25/perkins-coie-llp-on-court-confirms-20m-settlement-with-louisiana-citizens-late-claim-payments-hurricanes-katrina-rita.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2013/02/25/perkins-coie-llp-on-court-confirms-20m-settlement-with-louisiana-citizens-late-claim-payments-hurricanes-katrina-rita.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Author+Thumbnails/Aaron-Coombs.jpg" border="0" style="max-width:550px;" alt="" /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; By Aaron D. Coombs, &lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;Associate, Perkins Coie LLP&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;District Judge Kern Reece of Orleans Parish, Louisiana, approved a $20&amp;nbsp;million class-action settlement with Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Company on January 30, 2013, for claims related to the insurance company&amp;#39;s alleged untimely payment of claims resulting from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.&amp;nbsp; The settlement in &lt;i&gt;Orrill, et al. v. Louisiana Citizens Fair Plan, et al., &lt;/i&gt;No. 05-11720, Orleans Parish Dist. Ct. Div. L-6, should resolve one of several class actions that were filed against Citizens</description><author>PerkinsCoie@placeholder.com (Perkins Coie)</author><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:10:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Bullivant Houser Bailey: California Court Rejects Declination Regardless of Insured's Breach of Proof of Loss and Notice Requirements</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2012/11/29/insurance-law-contract-interpretation-property-insurance-california-court-declination-insured-breach-proof-of-loss-notice-requirement.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2012/11/29/insurance-law-contract-interpretation-property-insurance-california-court-declination-insured-breach-proof-of-loss-notice-requirement.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.bullivant.com/index.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/Portal/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images/Bullivant-logo.jpg" alt="Bullivant Houser Bailey PC" border="0" style="max-width:550px;border:0;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;By &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.bullivant.com/Jess-Millikan" title="Bullivant Houser Bailey PC"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#0000ff;"&gt;Jess B. Millikan&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;, Shareholder, Bullivant Houser Bailey PC&lt;/span</description><author>BullivantHouserBaileyPC2@placeholder.com (Bullivant Houser Bailey PC)</author><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:28:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>SNR Denton US LLP on Miller v. Safeco Insurance Co. of Am.: Insurer May Not Enforce Exclusions in Newly Issued Property Insurance Policy If Insured Not Notified of Those Exclusions Before Discovering the Loss</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2012/11/01/insurance-law-safeco-insurance-insurer-exclusion-newly-issued-property-insurance-policy-insured-notify-discover-loss.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2012/11/01/insurance-law-safeco-insurance-insurer-exclusion-newly-issued-property-insurance-policy-insured-notify-discover-loss.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/documents/images/20080321053524_large.jpg" alt="William Barker" border="0" style="max-width:550px;border:0;" /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;By William T. Barker, Partner, SNR Denton LLP&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;The Millers purchased a home with severe preexisting water and mold damage which they and their home inspector failed to detect.&amp;nbsp; In &lt;i&gt;Miller v. Safeco Insurance Co of Am., &lt;/i&gt;the Seventh Circuit held that the loss had not manifested itself until after the policy took effect and that State Farm could not rely on exclusions in the policy because the Millers had not been notified of those exclusions before discovering the loss.&amp;nbsp; This commentary criticizes that</description><author>wbarker@sonnenschein.com (William T. Barker)</author><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:12:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Class Action Certified for Lender Requiring More Flood Insurance</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2012/10/02/class-action-certified-for-lender-requiring-more-flood-insurance.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2012/10/02/class-action-certified-for-lender-requiring-more-flood-insurance.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/bankruptcylaw/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Contributor+Spotlight+Authors/Barry-Zalma-130-x-112.jpg" border="0" style="max-width:550px;" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;THE MISCHIEVIOUS CLASS ACTION &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Home mortgage lenders are always concerned that their security is appropriately protected by insurance. As a result, by the terms and conditions, of the mortgage the lender keeps to itself the right to compel the borrower to buy sufficient insurance. In &lt;i&gt;Stanley Kolbe v. Bac Home Loans Servicing, LP, D/B/A Bank of America, N.A,&lt;/i&gt; No. 11-2030 (1st Cir. 09/21/2012) the bank asked that the borrower, Stanley Kolbe (&amp;quot;Kolbe&amp;quot;) and &lt;i&gt;Susan Lass v. Bank of America, N.A., and Bac Home Loans Servicing&lt;/i&gt;, L.P, No. 11-2037 (1st Cir. 09/21/2012), increase the amount of flood insurance he carried by the amount of $46,000. Kolbe did not allege, and the record is devoid of facts that show how much additional</description><author>zalma@zalma.com (Barry Zalma)</author><pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 13:59:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Jing on Insurance Coverage for Construction Defects: Developments in Federal &amp; State Law</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2012/09/11/insurance-law-defective-workmanship-commercial-general-liability-insurance-coverage-construction-defects-developments-federal-state-law.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2012/09/11/insurance-law-defective-workmanship-commercial-general-liability-insurance-coverage-construction-defects-developments-federal-state-law.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Jing on Insurance Coverage for Construction Defects:&amp;nbsp; Recent Developments in Federal and State Law &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;i&gt;by Audrey J. Jing of Kelley, Drye &amp;amp; Warren LLP&lt;/i&gt;&lt;b&gt; &lt;/b&gt;examines&lt;b&gt; &lt;/b&gt;the current split among jurisdictions as to whether a claim for defective workmanship falls within the scope of the standard form insuring agreement, &lt;i&gt;i.e&lt;/i&gt;. whether such a claim can allege &amp;quot;property damage&amp;quot; caused by an &amp;quot;occurrence&amp;quot; under a CGL policy. The commentary analyzes court decisions from a number of jurisdictions that hold that damage resulting from faulty workmanship may be accidental or fortuitous, and thus may be caused by an &amp;quot;occurrence.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; It also analyzes court decisions from other jurisdictions which find that defective workmanship can never result in property damage deemed unintended or accidental, and thus, cannot trigger coverage.&amp;nbsp; The commentary</description><author>Lexisnexisinsurancelawstaff@placeholder.com (LexisNexis Insurance Law Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 19:25:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Ensuing Loss Provisions, Efficient Proximate Cause Rule, and Definition of Collapse Addressed by WA Supreme Court</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2012/06/19/insurance-law-ensuing-loss-provision-efficient-proximate-cause-rule-definition-collapse-supreme-court-of-washington.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2012/06/19/insurance-law-ensuing-loss-provision-efficient-proximate-cause-rule-definition-collapse-supreme-court-of-washington.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.bullivant.com/index.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/Portal/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images/Bullivant-logo.jpg" alt="Bullivant Houser Bailey" border="0" style="max-width:550px;border:0;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;By &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.bullivant.com/Jerret-Sale"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#0000ff;"&gt;Jerret E. Sale&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.bullivant.com/Dan-Bentson"&gt;&lt;span style</description><author>BullivantHouserBaileyPC2@placeholder.com (Bullivant Houser Bailey PC)</author><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:01:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>McKenna Long &amp; Aldridge LLP On A Roadmap For Determining Coverage For Construction Defect Claims In New York</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2012/04/23/cgl-insurance-law-mckenna-long-aldridge-llp-roadmap-determining-coverage-construction-defect-claims-new-york.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2012/04/23/cgl-insurance-law-mckenna-long-aldridge-llp-roadmap-determining-coverage-construction-defect-claims-new-york.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Author+Thumbnails/Richard-Friedman--Stephen-Berry-Michael-Freed.gif" alt="Richard Friedman and Stephen Berry and Michael Freed" border="0" style="max-width:550px;border:0;" /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;By Richard B. Friedman, J. Stephen Berry, and P. Michael Freed, Attorneys, McKenna Long &amp;amp; Aldridge LLP&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;In their commentary, &lt;i&gt;McKenna Long &amp;amp; Aldridge LLP on a Roadmap for Determining Coverage for Construction Defect Claims in New York&lt;/i&gt;, by Richard B. Friedman, J. Stephen Berry and P. Michael Freed observe that New York law makes it difficult for general</description><author>Lexisnexisinsurancelawstaff@placeholder.com (LexisNexis Insurance Law Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:57:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Don't Expect Your Homeowner's Insurance To Cover Pollution When You Lease Your Back Yard to Shale Gas Fracking Drillers</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2012/03/16/environmental-law-homeowners-insurance-cover-pollution-lease-back-yard-shale-gas-fracking-drillers.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2012/03/16/environmental-law-homeowners-insurance-cover-pollution-lease-back-yard-shale-gas-fracking-drillers.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;Ropers Majeski Kohn &amp;amp; Bentley partners Thomas Clarke and&amp;nbsp;Dean Pappas have published an informative article by Best&amp;#39;s Review (February 2012) that looks at the potential risks that arise from hydrofracking operations, and the extent to which a typical homeowner&amp;#39;s insurance policy covers the damages and harms that may arise.&amp;nbsp;Homeowners and their insurance agents&amp;nbsp;proceed at their peril if they expect&amp;nbsp;insurance coverage&amp;nbsp;when pollution from drilling&amp;nbsp;spills over to the neighbor&amp;#39;s property. Read or download this timely article,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.rmkb.com/tasks/sites/rmkb/assets/image/2-2012%20-%20Best&amp;#39;s%20Review.pdf" title="Right Click to Download"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#0000ff;"&gt;Under Cover: Do Homeowner Policies Protect Against Liability</description><author>tclarke@rmkb.com (Thomas H. Clarke, Jr.)</author><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:51:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>McCarter &amp; English LLP on New Jersey Appellate Division Opens Door to Coverage for Subcontractors' Defective Work</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2012/03/04/mccarter-amp-english-llp-on-new-jersey-appellate-division-opens-door-to-coverage-for-subcontractors-defective-work.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2012/03/04/mccarter-amp-english-llp-on-new-jersey-appellate-division-opens-door-to-coverage-for-subcontractors-defective-work.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INSURANCELAW/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Author+Thumbnails/Craig-Davis-and-Nicholas-Insua.gif" alt="Craig Davis and Nicholas Insua" border="0" style="max-width:550px;border:0;" /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;By Craig W. Davis and Nicholas M. Insua, Attorneys, McCarter &amp;amp; English, LLP&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;A recent decision by New Jersey&amp;#39;s Appellate Division questions the continued viability of prior New Jersey decisional law regarding whether property damage caused by faulty construction constitutes an &amp;quot;occurrence&amp;quot; for purposes of commercial general liability (&amp;quot;CGL&amp;quot;) coverage.&amp;nbsp; The court in</description><author>Lexisnexisinsurancelawstaff@placeholder.com (LexisNexis Insurance Law Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 12:45:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>McCarter &amp; English LLP on Chinese Drywall Litigation and Insurance Coverage</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2012/01/17/mccarter-amp-english-llp-on-chinese-drywall-litigation-and-insurance-coverage.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2012/01/17/mccarter-amp-english-llp-on-chinese-drywall-litigation-and-insurance-coverage.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Author+Thumbnails/Nicholas-Insua-and-Jason-Alexander.gif" alt="Nicholas Insua and Jason Alexander" border="0" style="max-width:550px;border:0;" /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;By Nicholas Insua, Jason Alexander &amp;amp; Michael Smith, Attorneys, McCarter &amp;amp; English, LLP&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;In their commentary, &amp;quot;Update: Chinese Drywall Litigation Continues,&amp;quot; Nicholas Insua, Jason Alexander &amp;amp; Michael Smith of McCarter &amp;amp; English, LLP, first note that&amp;nbsp; the housing boom of the mid-2000s created a shortage of American-manufactured drywall.&amp;nbsp; Builders filled the</description><author>Lexisnexisinsurancelawstaff@placeholder.com (LexisNexis Insurance Law Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:43:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Faulty Workmanship is Not an “Occurrence” But the Damage it Does Is an Occurrence</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2012/01/11/faulty-workmanship-not-occurrence-damage-is-occurrence-insurance-coverage.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2012/01/11/faulty-workmanship-not-occurrence-damage-is-occurrence-insurance-coverage.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Author+Thumbnails/Barry-Zalma.jpg" alt="Barry Zalma" border="0" style="max-width:550px;border:0;" /&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;By Barry Zalma, Attorney and Consultant&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;The Wisconsin Court of Appeal was called upon to resolve a dispute that arose out of damages suffered by VPP Group, LLC the grew from construction work being performed by contractors on a building owned by VPP. VPP was insured by Acuity. Acuity paid the damage claims filed by VPP arising out</description><author>zalma@zalma.com (Barry Zalma)</author><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:46:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Evaluating First-Party Property Claims with Multiple Causes Under the Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2011/12/27/evaluating-first-party-property-claims-with-multiple-causes-under-the-efficient-proximate-cause-doctrine.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2011/12/27/evaluating-first-party-property-claims-with-multiple-causes-under-the-efficient-proximate-cause-doctrine.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Author+Thumbnails/Susan-Field-Rina-Carmel.gif" alt="Susan Field and Rina Carmel" border="0" style="max-width:550px;border:0;" /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;By Susan J. Field and Rina Carmel, Attorneys, Musick, Peeler &amp;amp; Garrett LLP&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;In &amp;quot;Evaluating First-Party Property Claims with Multiple Causes Under the Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine,&amp;quot; appearing in the November/December 2011 issue of &lt;i&gt;Coverage&lt;/i&gt;, Susan J. Field and Rina Carmel of Musick, Peeler &amp;amp; Garrett LLP in Los Angeles initially note that for a claim to be covered by first-party</description><author>Lexisnexisinsurancelawstaff@placeholder.com (LexisNexis Insurance Law Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 15:50:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Sweet Defective-Home Alabama: Supreme Court Addresses The “Occurrence” Issue</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2011/11/14/sweet-defective-home-alabama-supreme-court-addresses-occurrence-issue-commercial-general-liability.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2011/11/14/sweet-defective-home-alabama-supreme-court-addresses-occurrence-issue-commercial-general-liability.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&amp;quot;Sub-Contractor&amp;quot; Exception Applies - But Not To A Sub-Contractor&amp;#39;s Own Work&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;img height="56" width="65" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Contributor+Spotlight+Authors/Randy-Maniloff-130-x-112.jpg" alt="Randy Maniloff" border="0" style="max-width:550px;border:0;" /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Randy J. Maniloff, White and Williams, LLP&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;Last month I was in</description><author>maniloffr@whiteandwilliams.com (Randy J. Maniloff)</author><pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:52:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Sweet Carolina For Policyholders: Good Times Will Never Seem So Good For Construction Defect Claims</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2011/10/27/sweet-carolina-policyholders-good-times-will-never-seem-so-good-construction-defect-claims-cgl.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2011/10/27/sweet-carolina-policyholders-good-times-will-never-seem-so-good-construction-defect-claims-cgl.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;South Carolina Supreme Court Withdraws Crossmann Communities and Allows Coverage for Consequential Damages of Construction Defects -&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Court Adopts Time on the Risk Allocation&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;img height="56" width="65" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Contributor+Spotlight+Authors/Randy-Maniloff-130-x-112.jpg" alt="Randy Maniloff" border="0" style="max-width:550px;border:0;" /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Randy J. Maniloff, White and Williams, LLP&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style</description><author>maniloffr@whiteandwilliams.com (Randy J. Maniloff)</author><pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 13:53:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Continuous Trigger: The ShamWow of Coverage Issues – Sucking Insurers Dry of Much More Than Would Seem Possible</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2011/10/17/continuous-trigger-the-shamwow-of-coverage-issues-sucking-insurers-dry-of-much-more-than-would-seem-possible.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2011/10/17/continuous-trigger-the-shamwow-of-coverage-issues-sucking-insurers-dry-of-much-more-than-would-seem-possible.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Federal Court Rejects Continuous Trigger for Construction Defects&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;img height="56" width="65" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Contributor+Spotlight+Authors/Randy-Maniloff-130-x-112.jpg" alt="Randy Maniloff" border="0" style="max-width:550px;border:0;" /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Randy J. Maniloff, White and Williams, LLP&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;We&amp;#39;ve all had a waiter</description><author>maniloffr@whiteandwilliams.com (Randy J. Maniloff)</author><pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:53:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Bullivant Secures Jury Verdict, Court Awards Judgment under Counterclaim for First-Party Insurance Fraud</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2011/10/03/bullivant-secures-jury-verdict-court-awards-judgment-under-counterclaim-for-first-party-insurance-fraud.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2011/10/03/bullivant-secures-jury-verdict-court-awards-judgment-under-counterclaim-for-first-party-insurance-fraud.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.bullivant.com/index.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/Portal/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images/Bullivant-logo.jpg" alt="Bullivant Houser Bailey PC" border="0" style="max-width:550px;border:0;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;By John A. Bennett, Stuart D. Jones, Matthew E. Hedberg, Andrew E. Passmore, Attorneys, Bullivant Houser Bailey PC&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;Following a two-month trial, Safeco Insurance Company of Oregon</description><author>BullivantHouserBaileyPC2@placeholder.com (Bullivant Houser Bailey PC)</author><pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 17:49:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>LexisNexis® Insurance Law Community Podcast: Selena J. Linde on Hurricane Irene Insurance Coverage Issues</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2011/08/30/LexisNexis_AE00_-Insurance-Law-Community-Podcast_3A00_-Selena-J.-Linde-on-Hurricane-Irene-Insurance-Coverage-Issues.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2011/08/30/LexisNexis_AE00_-Insurance-Law-Community-Podcast_3A00_-Selena-J.-Linde-on-Hurricane-Irene-Insurance-Coverage-Issues.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;On this edition, Selena J. Linde of Perkins Coie in Washington, D.C. discusses insurance claims arising from Hurricane Irene. She reviews business interruption and contingent business interruption claims, differences between flood and hurricane damage and steps companies should take to maximize recovery.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;Readers can obtain find additional resources on hurricane and flood insurance coverage and free downloads at &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/insurancelaw/blogs/freedownloads/archive/2011/08/29/insurance-implications-in-the-wake-of-hurricane-irene.aspx"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#0000ff;"&gt;Insurance Implications in the Wake of Hurricane Irene&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style=</description><author>legalbusinesscommunity@placeholder.com (LexisNexis Legal Business Community Staff)</author><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3?http://www.lexisnexis.com/mealeys/podcasts/LNINPODCAST_083011.mp3" length="550" type="audio/mp3" /><pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 13:00:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Insurance Implications in the Wake of Hurricane Irene</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2011/08/29/insurance-implications-in-the-wake-of-hurricane-irene.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2011/08/29/insurance-implications-in-the-wake-of-hurricane-irene.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;After Hurricane Irene, individuals and businesses will face property losses and interruption of business and will look to insurers for coverage of these multi-faceted losses. To remain up-to-date on the coverage issues raised by Hurricane Irene and similar natural events, we invite our Community to access the following resources (some that are specific to states directly impacted by the Hurricane, such as New Jersey and New York):&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;MATTHEW BENDER PUBLICATIONS&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;</description><author>Lexisnexisinsurancelawstaff@placeholder.com (LexisNexis Insurance Law Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:39:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Trespass Can Never be an Accident</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2011/08/10/trespass-can-never-be-an-accident-fifth-circuit-intentional-tort-negligence.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2011/08/10/trespass-can-never-be-an-accident-fifth-circuit-intentional-tort-negligence.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;img border="0" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Author+Thumbnails/Barry-Zalma.jpg" alt="Barry Zalma" style="max-width:550px;border:0;" /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;By Barry Zalma, Attorney and Consultant&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Insurance Is&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;Insurance is a contract where a person (the insurer) agrees to indemnify another (the insured) against certain defined risks of loss, damage, or liability</description><author>zalma@zalma.com (Barry Zalma)</author><pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:08:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Michigan Court Holds No Coverage Under Successive UST Policies</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2011/07/22/michigan-court-holds-no-coverage-under-successive-ust-policies-claims-made-insurance-coverage.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2011/07/22/michigan-court-holds-no-coverage-under-successive-ust-policies-claims-made-insurance-coverage.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;img border="0" width="65" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Contributor+Spotlight+Authors/Brian-Margolies-130-x-112.jpg" alt="Brian Margolies" height="56" style="max-width:550px;border:0;" /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;Brian Margolies, Partner, Traub Lieberman Straus &amp;amp; Shrewsberry LLP&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;In its recent decision &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?app=00075&amp;amp;view=full&amp;amp;searchtype=get&amp;amp;search=2011+U.S.+Dist.+LEXIS+73675&amp;amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00204" title="Lexis.com"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#0000ff;"&gt;&lt;em&gt;Webb Operating Co. v. Zurich American Ins. Co&lt;/em&gt;., 2011 U.S. Dist</description><author>bmargolies@traublieberman.com (Brian Margolies)</author><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 16:27:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>The Problem of Mutual Benefit Insurance</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2011/07/07/the-problem-of-mutual-benefit-insurance-underwriters-lloyds-london-cape-publications-barry-zalma.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/blogs/propertyinsurance/archive/2011/07/07/the-problem-of-mutual-benefit-insurance-underwriters-lloyds-london-cape-publications-barry-zalma.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;img border="0" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/insurancelaw/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Author+Thumbnails/Barry-Zalma.jpg" alt="Barry Zalma" style="max-width:550px;border:0;" /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;strong&gt;By Barry Zalma, Attorney and Consultant&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;When a person leases a portion of a structure with multiple tenants it is usual for the landlord to promise to buy property insurance to protect the entire structure and make, as part of the rent charged, the tenant pay a ratable portion of the insurance. When, due to the negligence of the tenant the property is damaged by fire, the insurer will pay the named insured and then attempt to recover</description><author>zalma@zalma.com (Barry Zalma)</author><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 14:26:00 -0400</pubDate></item></channel></rss>