﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../StyleSheet/rss.xsl"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>International &amp; Foreign Law Community Blogs</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/international-foreignlaw</link><description>The platform that enables you to build rich, interactive communities</description><copyright>http://www.lexisnexis.com/terms/copyright.aspx</copyright><atom:link href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/international-foreignlaw/Rss.aspx?id=314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>TRACE Blog</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/topblogs/archive/2013/03/08/trace-blog.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/topblogs/archive/2013/03/08/trace-blog.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://traceblog.org/"&gt;Trace blog&lt;/a&gt; is the anti-bribery compliance blog of &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.traceinternational.org/"&gt;Trace International&lt;/a&gt;, an anti-bribery membership organization offering practical tools and services.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>InternationalForeignLaw@lnstaff.com (International &amp; Foreign Law Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 11:43:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>III St. Petersburg International Legal Forum will take place in St. Petersburg, Russia on May 15-18, 2013</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2013/02/13/iii-st-petersburg-international-legal-forum-will-take-place-in-st-petersburg-russia-on-may-15-18-2013.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2013/02/13/iii-st-petersburg-international-legal-forum-will-take-place-in-st-petersburg-russia-on-may-15-18-2013.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p align="justify"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/internationalandforeignlawblog/St.-Petersburg-logo.jpg" style="max-width:550px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align="justify"&gt;St. Petersburg International Legal Forum is an annual
 event that has taken place since 2011. It has already become one of the 
largest international debate platforms for legal experts. 
Representatives of almost all legal areas of specialization and legal 
systems as well as business and government representatives attended the 
Forum in 2011 and 2012. They were joined by an international group of 
economists to discuss a wide range of legal and business issues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align="justify"&gt;The number of guests tripled in 2012. The business 
agenda of the conference has been considerably extended up to 40 
discussions sessions during two days. The Forum agenda includes a wide 
set of topics</description><author>InternationalForeignLaw@lnstaff.com (International &amp; Foreign Law Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 08:54:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Symposium: China Institute of International Antitrust and Investment, March 21-22, Beijing China</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2013/02/08/symposium-china-institute-of-international-antitrust-and-investment-march-21-22-beijing-china.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2013/02/08/symposium-china-institute-of-international-antitrust-and-investment-march-21-22-beijing-china.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LegalBusiness/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Miscellaneous+Images/ContentImage_2D00_ChinaFlag.jpg" style="max-width:550px;border:0;float:left;margin:12px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;The China Institute of International Antitrust and
Investment (CIIAI) was established in March 2012 by the China University of
Political Science and Law, each of which is based in Beijing, with the goals of
promoting due process and transparency in antitrust proceedings, as well as the
adoption of &amp;quot;best practices&amp;quot; where it is reasonable to do so. The CIIAI seeks
to achieve these objectives by encouraging open, intellectual debate between
antitrust regulators, private practitioners, and scholars.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The CIIAI is proud to announce that its inaugural
symposium will take place on 21-22 March 2013 at the Friendship Hotel in
Beijing. The emphasis of this symposium is on Chinese antitrust law and, specifically,
what</description><author>InternationalForeignLaw@lnstaff.com (International &amp; Foreign Law Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 15:09:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Israël, la Palestine et la Cour pénale internationale</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2013/01/18/isra-235-l-la-palestine-et-la-cour-p-233-nale-internationale.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2013/01/18/isra-235-l-la-palestine-et-la-cour-p-233-nale-internationale.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p align="center" class="MsoBodyText" style="text-align:center;margin:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;span lang="FR" style="mso-ansi-language:FR;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Times New Roman;"&gt;Isra&amp;euml;l, la Palestine et la Cour p&amp;eacute;nale internationale&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align="center" class="MsoBodyText" style="text-align:center;margin:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;"&gt;Par John M. B. Balouziyeh, Esq.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3 style="margin:12pt 0in 6pt 0.25in;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Times New Roman;"&gt;&lt;span style="mso-bidi-font-family:&amp;#39;Times New Roman&amp;#39;;"&gt;&lt;span style="mso-list:Ignore;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;1.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font:7pt &amp;#39;Times New Roman&amp;#39;;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;Introduction &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoBodyText" style="margin:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;span lang="FR" style="mso-ansi-language</description><author>thomas.stadnik@lexisnexis.com (Thomas J.R. Stadnik, Esq.)</author><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 08:53:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Palestinian Statehood under International Law</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2013/01/03/palestinian-statehood-under-international-law.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2013/01/03/palestinian-statehood-under-international-law.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p align="center" class="MsoBodyText" style="text-align:center;margin:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Times New Roman;"&gt;Palestinian Statehood under International Law&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align="center" class="MsoBodyText" style="text-align:center;margin:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:small;"&gt;An Analysis and Discussion by John M. B. Balouyizeh, Esq.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align="center" class="MsoBodyText" style="text-align:center;margin:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Times New Roman;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3 style="margin:9pt 0in 3pt 0.25in;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Times New Roman;"&gt;&lt;span style="mso-bidi-font-family:&amp;#39;Times New Roman&amp;#39;;"&gt;&lt;span style="mso-list:Ignore;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;1.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font:7pt &amp;#39;Times New Roman&amp;#39;;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;</description><author>thomas.stadnik@lexisnexis.com (Thomas J.R. Stadnik, Esq.)</author><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:33:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>We Still Don't Punish Contractors for Slavery on U.S. Bases</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2012/12/13/we-still-don-t-punish-contractors-for-slavery-on-u-s-bases.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2012/12/13/we-still-don-t-punish-contractors-for-slavery-on-u-s-bases.aspx</guid><description>&lt;h1&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:x-small;"&gt;By Samir Goswami &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;U.S. military bases overseas rely on contracted migrant labor for things like food services and laundry-a system that has long imperiled the rights of foreign workers serving the very missions that claim to promote freedom. Though President Obama this year pledged to crack down on the practice, last week Congress decided that companies providing forced labor for government contracts should not be held criminally liable for exploitation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="Object-hover" id="OBJ_PREFIX_DWT512"&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://humangoods.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Untitled-9.gif"&gt;&lt;span style="color:blue;text-decoration:none;"&gt;&lt;img height="280" width="520" id="Picture_x0020_1" src="http://web.mail.comcast.net/service/home/~/?auth=co&amp;amp;id=360519&amp;amp;part=2" alt="http://humangoods.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Untitled-9.gif" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color:#999999;"&gt;Photo by &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class</description><author>Samir.goswami@gmail.com (Samir Goswami)</author><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:20:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>New Edition of Littler Mendelson’s Guide to International Employment and Labor Law</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2012/10/25/new-edition-of-littler-mendelson-s-guide-to-international-employment-and-labor-law.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2012/10/25/new-edition-of-littler-mendelson-s-guide-to-international-employment-and-labor-law.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/labor-employment-commentary/9781422482438.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="border:0;float:left;margin:10px;" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/labor-employment-commentary/9781422482438.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/store/catalog/booktemplate/productdetail.jsp?pageName=relatedProducts&amp;amp;skuId=SKU73140&amp;amp;catId=385&amp;amp;prodId=73140&amp;amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00209"&gt;The Littler Mendelson Guide to International
Employment and Labor Law,&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/store/catalog/booktemplate/productdetail.jsp?pageName=relatedProducts&amp;amp;skuId=SKU73140&amp;amp;catId=385&amp;amp;prodId=73140&amp;amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00209"&gt; &lt;i&gt;Third Edition&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; includes
country-by-country analyses written by top</description><author>dougesten.lnc@gmail.com (LexisNexis Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:14:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Brazil Supreme Court Upholds Clean Record (Electoral Qualification) Law Based on “Voice of the People”</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2012/08/26/brazil-supreme-court-upholds-clean-record-electoral-qualification-law-based-on-voice-of-the-people.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2012/08/26/brazil-supreme-court-upholds-clean-record-electoral-qualification-law-based-on-voice-of-the-people.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:10pt;line-height:115%;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;In June, 2010, Brazil enacted the &amp;ldquo;Lei da Ficha Limpa&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;Clean Record Law&amp;rdquo; which aimed to prevent candidates who had a criminal record or a record of misconduct from running for political office in Federal, State or Municipal spheres.&lt;span style="color:#0000ff;"&gt;1 &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;Pursuant to the &amp;quot;Clean Record Law&amp;quot;, any politician convicted by a judicial or an administrative court will be disqualified as a potential candidate for political office for any level of government for a period of eight consecutive years.&amp;nbsp; The law applies to candidates even if a conviction is pending a decision by a</description><author>direitocomparado2@uol.com.br (Joao Carlos Souto)</author><pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:18:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>II St. Petersburg International Legal Forum will take place in St. Petersburg, Russia on May 16-19, 2012</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2012/08/02/the-second-st-petersburg-international-legal-forum-st-petersburg-russia-may-16-19-2012.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2012/08/02/the-second-st-petersburg-international-legal-forum-st-petersburg-russia-may-16-19-2012.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/internationalandforeignlawblog/St.-Petersburg-logo.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/internationalandforeignlawblog/St.-Petersburg-logo.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;II St. Petersburg International Legal Forum will take place in St. Petersburg, Russia on May 16-19, 2012&lt;/b&gt; .&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;St. Petersburg International Legal Forum, organized by the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation, the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation and the &amp;quot;State Hermitage&amp;quot; Federal Cultural Institution under the auspices of the President of the Russian Federation, is a new platform for dialogue of politicians, lawyers and world leading experts in the spheres of law, economics and international relations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The</description><author>InternationalForeignLaw@lnstaff.com (International &amp; Foreign Law Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 00:01:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Michelle Brané To Receive 11th Annual Daniel Levy Memorial Award for Outstanding Achievement in Immigration Law</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2012/05/22/michelle-bran-233-to-receive-11th-annual-daniel-levy-memorial-award-for-outstanding-achievement-in-immigration-law.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2012/05/22/michelle-bran-233-to-receive-11th-annual-daniel-levy-memorial-award-for-outstanding-achievement-in-immigration-law.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:x-small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;color:#404040;font-size:10.5pt;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-ansi-language:EN-GB;mso-fareast-language:EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;color:#404040;font-size:10.5pt;mso-fareast-font-family:&amp;#39;Times New Roman&amp;#39;;mso-ansi-language:EN-GB;mso-fareast-language:EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.womensrefugeecommission.org/images/organization/6867359854bde16efdd67a.jpg" alt="Michelle Bran&amp;eacute;" id="_x0000_i1025" border="0" /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;color:#404040;font-size:10.5pt;mso-ansi-language:EN-GB;" lang="EN-GB"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt;Michelle Bran&amp;eacute;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style="font</description><author>InternationalForeignLaw@lnstaff.com (International &amp; Foreign Law Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 14:31:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>The United States and Other Nations Expand Sanctions Against Iran</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/12/15/the-united-states-and-other-nations-expand-sanctions-against-iran.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/12/15/the-united-states-and-other-nations-expand-sanctions-against-iran.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fulbright Briefing&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=attorneys.detail&amp;amp;emp_id=692"&gt;Stephen M. McNabb&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=attorneys.detail&amp;amp;emp_id=10271"&gt;Marsha Z. Gerber&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=attorneys.detail&amp;amp;emp_id=14773"&gt;Stefan Reisinger&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=attorneys.detail&amp;amp;emp_id=13453"&gt;Mary Beth Balhoff&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On November 21, 2011, the United States announced three measures designed to enhance sanctions on Iran. The President issued an Executive Order authorizing the Secretary of State to impose sanctions on foreign parties that provide goods, services, technology or support of certain value to Iran&amp;#39;s energy or petrochemical sectors; the Secretary of the Treasury designated Iran as a jurisdiction of &amp;quot;primary money laundering concern&amp;quot; under Section 311 of the U.S. Patriot Act; and Treasury&amp;#39;s</description><author>FulbrightandJaworski@placeholder.com (Fulbright and Jaworski L.L.P. )</author><pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>OFAC Significantly Eases Existing Restrictions on Transactions With South Sudan</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/12/14/ofac-significantly-eases-existing-restrictions-on-transactions-with-south-sudan.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/12/14/ofac-significantly-eases-existing-restrictions-on-transactions-with-south-sudan.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fulbright Alert&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=attorneys.detail&amp;amp;emp_id=692"&gt;Stephen M. McNabb&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=attorneys.detail&amp;amp;emp_id=10271"&gt;Marsha Z. Gerber&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=attorneys.detail&amp;amp;emp_id=14773"&gt;Stefan Reisinger&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=attorneys.detail&amp;amp;emp_id=14100"&gt;Fatema Merchant&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On December 8, 2011, the U.S. Department of Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (&amp;quot;OFAC&amp;quot;) issued a final rule[1] that amended the Sudanese Sanctions Regulations (&amp;quot;SSR&amp;quot;) by creating two new general licenses that significantly ease remaining restrictions on transactions with the newly independent Republic of South Sudan (&amp;quot;South Sudan&amp;quot;), including with its oil and gas industry.[2] The new general licenses (31 C.F.R. &amp;sect;&amp;sect; 538.536 and 538.537), which are effective</description><author>FulbrightandJaworski@placeholder.com (Fulbright and Jaworski L.L.P. )</author><pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:33:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Iran Sanctions Update: European Union Imposes Further Restrictive Measures Against Iran, With More to Follow</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/12/14/iran-sanctions-update-european-union-imposes-further-restrictive-measures-against-iran-with-more-to-follow.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/12/14/iran-sanctions-update-european-union-imposes-further-restrictive-measures-against-iran-with-more-to-follow.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fulbright Briefing&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=attorneys.detail&amp;amp;emp_id=12850"&gt;Lista M. Cannon&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=attorneys.detail&amp;amp;emp_id=12816"&gt;David M. Harris&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=attorneys.detail&amp;amp;emp_id=14268"&gt;Nicola Kelly&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In further developments since our briefing of 28 November 2011,[1] the Council of the European Union has decided that a further 143 entities and 37 individuals will be subject to restrictive measures concerning Iran. The decision follows the Foreign Affairs Council meeting in Brussels on 1 December 2011. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To give effect to the latest round of sanctions the Council has adopted EU Regulation No. 1245/2011, which provides that a total of 180 entities and individuals will be subject to a freeze on their assets and economic resources in the EU. The entities and individuals will also be subject to a travel ban on</description><author>FulbrightandJaworski@placeholder.com (Fulbright and Jaworski L.L.P. )</author><pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:05:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>U.K. Ban on Transactions with Iranian Banks</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/12/14/u-k-ban-on-transactions-with-iranian-banks.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/12/14/u-k-ban-on-transactions-with-iranian-banks.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fulbright Briefing&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By &lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=attorneys.detail&amp;amp;emp_id=12850"&gt;Lista M. Cannon&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=attorneys.detail&amp;amp;emp_id=12816"&gt;David M. Harris&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=attorneys.detail&amp;amp;emp_id=14268"&gt;Nicola Kelly&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the latest wave of sanctions targeting Iran, the U.K. has taken steps independently of the UN Security Council and EU regulations to cut off all ties with Iranian banks. The new sanctions apply to all persons operating in the U.K. financial sector and place an additional compliance burden in an area that already requires stringent policies and procedures. The U.K. financial and credit institutions engaged in business in the region should monitor the developments closely. Further restrictive measures appear likely as the situation in Iran remains uncertain. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rationale for the new restrictive measures</description><author>FulbrightandJaworski@placeholder.com (Fulbright and Jaworski L.L.P. )</author><pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:42:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Claim Alleging Derivative Possession of Good Allegedly “Taken” in Violation of International Law Still Precluded by FSIA</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/12/14/claim-alleging-derivative-possession-of-good-allegedly-taken-in-violation-of-international-law-still-precluded-by-fsia.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/12/14/claim-alleging-derivative-possession-of-good-allegedly-taken-in-violation-of-international-law-still-precluded-by-fsia.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/international-foreignlaw/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.I+_2600_+FL+Images/Cadwalader_5F00_OneWorld.jpg" border="0" style="max-width:550px;" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;by &lt;a href="http://blog.internationalpractice.org/author/editor"&gt;Louis M. Solomon&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We discuss briefly the final installment (in the District Court) of the attempt to recover possession of a Van Gogh drawing allegedly sold away from the plaintiff&amp;#39;s great-grandmother &amp;quot;under duress during the Nazi era in Germany for fraction of its fair value&amp;quot;, &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.internationalpractice.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Orkin-v.-Swiss-Confederation.pdf"&gt;Orkin v. The Swiss Confederation&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, 09 Civ. 10013 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 2011) (LAK). An earlier dismissal in the case is discussed &lt;a href="http://blog.internationalpractice.org/international-practice/another-alleged-nazi-looted-art-case-dismissed</description><author>OneWorld@placeholder.com (Cadwalader OneWorld International Practice)</author><pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 15:00:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>FSIA Immunity Found In Suit Against Germany; Neither Commercial Activity Nor Takings Exceptions Applies To Real Property Located in Germany</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/11/28/fsia-immunity-found-in-suit-against-germany-neither-commercial-activity-nor-takings-exceptions-applies-to-real-property-located-in-germany.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/11/28/fsia-immunity-found-in-suit-against-germany-neither-commercial-activity-nor-takings-exceptions-applies-to-real-property-located-in-germany.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" title="Cadwalader OneWorld International Practice Blog" href="http://blog.internationalpractice.org/%20%20%20%20"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/international-foreignlaw/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.I+_2600_+FL+Images/Cadwalader_5F00_OneWorld.jpg" style="max-width:550px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By &lt;a href="http://blog.internationalpractice.org/author/editor" title="View all posts by Louis M. Solomon"&gt;Louis M. Solomon&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Hammerstein
v. The Federal Republic of Germany&lt;/i&gt;, 09-CV-443 (ARR)(RLM) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 2011) [&lt;a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?app=00075&amp;amp;view=full&amp;amp;searchtype=get&amp;amp;search=2011+U.S.+Dist.+LEXIS+88565&amp;amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00235" target="_blank"&gt;enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers&lt;/a&gt;], dismisses for want of subject matter
jurisdiction claims asserted against Germany.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Plaintiff fought over
the right to own the</description><author>OneWorld@placeholder.com (Cadwalader OneWorld International Practice)</author><pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:46:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Waiver of Privilege and Crime Fraud Exception at Play in International Litigation over Ecuadorian Judgment against Chevron</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/11/21/waiver-of-privilege-and-crime-fraud-exception-at-play-in-international-litigation-over-ecuadorian-judgment-against-chevron.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/11/21/waiver-of-privilege-and-crime-fraud-exception-at-play-in-international-litigation-over-ecuadorian-judgment-against-chevron.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" title="Cadwalader OneWorld International Practice Blog" href="http://blog.internationalpractice.org/%20%20%20%20%20"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/international-foreignlaw/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.I+_2600_+FL+Images/Cadwalader_5F00_OneWorld.jpg" style="max-width:550px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By &lt;a href="http://blog.internationalpractice.org/author/editor" title="View all posts by Louis M. Solomon"&gt;Louis M. Solomon&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The most recent installment in the U.S.
proceedings in which Chevron is trying to avoid the $8 billion judgment entered
against it in an Ecuadorian court (which we have posted on many times) takes the
form of a decision by a Magistrate Judge in the Southern District of New York on
Chevrons claims of waiver of privilege relating to the written communications of
various of the plaintiffs&amp;#39; lawyers.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;i&gt;Chevron Corp. v. Salazar, et
al.&lt;/i&gt;, 11</description><author>OneWorld@placeholder.com (Cadwalader OneWorld International Practice)</author><pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:43:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>9th Circuit Denies Rehearing in Bauman v. DaimlerChrysler</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/11/21/9th-circuit-denies-rehearing-in-bauman-v-daimlerchrysler.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/11/21/9th-circuit-denies-rehearing-in-bauman-v-daimlerchrysler.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" title="Cadwalader OneWorld International Practice Blog" href="http://blog.internationalpractice.org/%20%20%20%20"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/international-foreignlaw/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.I+_2600_+FL+Images/Cadwalader_5F00_OneWorld.jpg" style="max-width:550px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Finding Personal Jurisdiction by Imputation and Watering Down &amp;quot;Agency&amp;quot; Test for Finding Jurisdiction, Say 8th Circuit Judges Who Would Grant Rehearing En Banc
&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By &lt;a href="http://blog.internationalpractice.org/author/editor" title="View all posts by Louis M. Solomon"&gt;Louis M. Solomon&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bauman, et al. v. DaimlerChrysler,
et al., No. 07-15386 (9th Cir. 18 May
2011) [&lt;a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?app=00075&amp;amp;view=full&amp;amp;searchtype=get&amp;amp;search=2011+U.S.+App.+LEXIS+22612&amp;amp;Origination_Code=00235"&gt;enhanced</description><author>OneWorld@placeholder.com (Cadwalader OneWorld International Practice)</author><pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:35:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>European Commission Press Release: New rules for more efficient, resilient and transparent financial markets in Europe </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/11/14/european-commission-press-release-new-rules-for-more-efficient-resilient-and-transparent-financial-markets-in-europe.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/11/14/european-commission-press-release-new-rules-for-more-efficient-resilient-and-transparent-financial-markets-in-europe.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LEGALBUSINESS/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Author+Thumbnails/David-Gibbs_5F00_90x78.jpg" style="max-width:550px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The European Commission has recently
published a &lt;a href="http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/securities/news/index_en.htm"&gt;press
release&lt;/a&gt; announcing plans to revise the Markets in Financial Instruments
Directive (MiFID) in the form of a Directive and a Regulation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The aim is to ensure all trading venues have to &amp;quot;play by the same
transparency rules and that conflicts of interest are mitigated&amp;quot;. The
reforms also aim to provide better access to capital markets for Small and
Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs) by creating a specific label for SME Markets
that meet their needs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also mention of taking in to account technological advances that have
drastically increased the speed of trading that causes</description><author>david.gibbs@uea.ac.uk (David Gibbs)</author><pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:32:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Court Appoints Neutral Expert On Choice of Law Issues But Rejects Public International Law Concepts’ Applicability To Private Claims</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/11/11/court-appoints-neutral-expert-on-choice-of-law-issues-but-rejects-public-international-law-concepts-applicability-to-private-claims.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/11/11/court-appoints-neutral-expert-on-choice-of-law-issues-but-rejects-public-international-law-concepts-applicability-to-private-claims.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" title="Cadwalader OneWorld International Practice Blog" href="http://blog.internationalpractice.org/%20%20%20%20"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/international-foreignlaw/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.I+_2600_+FL+Images/Cadwalader_5F00_OneWorld.jpg" style="max-width:550px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By &lt;a href="http://blog.internationalpractice.org/author/editor" title="View all posts by Louis M. Solomon"&gt;Louis M. Solomon&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A recent decision, &lt;i&gt;Pallano v. AES
Corp.&lt;/i&gt;, C.A. No. 9C-11-021 JRJ (Del. Super. Ct. July 2011) [&lt;a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?app=00075&amp;amp;view=full&amp;amp;searchtype=get&amp;amp;search=2011+Del.+Super.+LEXIS+313&amp;amp;Origination_Code=00235"&gt;enhanced
version available to lexis.com subscribers&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;/ &lt;a href="http://www.lexisone.com/lx1/caselaw/freecaselaw?searchType=citation&amp;amp;fclSearch=2011+Del.+Super.+LEXIS+313&amp;amp;action=FCLSearchCaseByCitation&amp;amp;pageLimit</description><author>OneWorld@placeholder.com (Cadwalader OneWorld International Practice)</author><pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 12:23:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Supreme Court Agrees To Resolve Deep Circuit Split and Decide If Alien Tort Statute Permits Actions against Corporations</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/11/10/supreme-court-agrees-to-resolve-deep-circuit-split-and-decide-if-alien-tort-statute-permits-actions-against-corporations.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/11/10/supreme-court-agrees-to-resolve-deep-circuit-split-and-decide-if-alien-tort-statute-permits-actions-against-corporations.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" title="Cadwalader OneWorld International Practice Blog" href="http://blog.internationalpractice.org/%20%20%20%20"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/international-foreignlaw/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.I+_2600_+FL+Images/Cadwalader_5F00_OneWorld.jpg" style="max-width:550px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By &lt;a href="http://blog.internationalpractice.org/author/editor" title="View all posts by Louis M. Solomon"&gt;Louis M. Solomon&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have followed the development of federal
Circuit law on whether the Alien Tort Statute, 28 U.S.C. &amp;sect; 1350,&amp;nbsp;and specifically
the Torture Victim Protection Act, 28 U.S.C. &amp;sect; 1350 note &amp;sect; 2(a), create rights of
action against corporations.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The Supreme Court has agreed to decide
the issue.&amp;nbsp; The&amp;nbsp;issue presents a growing and important part of international
litigation and dispute resolution, including whether and to what extent</description><author>OneWorld@placeholder.com (Cadwalader OneWorld International Practice)</author><pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:30:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Combination of Arbitration and Non-U.S. Choice of Law Provisions Contrary To Public Policy; Defendant Permitted To Stipulate to U.S. Law to Compel Arbitration</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/11/07/combination-of-arbitration-and-non-u-s-choice-of-law-provisions-contrary-to-public-policy-defendant-permitted-to-stipulate-to-u-s-law-to-compel-arbitration.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/11/07/combination-of-arbitration-and-non-u-s-choice-of-law-provisions-contrary-to-public-policy-defendant-permitted-to-stipulate-to-u-s-law-to-compel-arbitration.aspx</guid><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 12:29:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Non-U.S. Judgment Enforced in U.S.</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/11/04/non-u-s-judgment-enforced-in-u-s.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/11/04/non-u-s-judgment-enforced-in-u-s.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Challenges
Even Based on Fraud Need To Be Asserted in the Country Issuing the Original Judgment;
U.S. Court Declines &amp;quot;Interjudicial Conference&amp;quot; of Having the Judges From the Two
Countries Talk&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" title="Cadwalader OneWorld International Practice Blog" href="http://blog.internationalpractice.org/%20%20%20%20"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/international-foreignlaw/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.I+_2600_+FL+Images/Cadwalader_5F00_OneWorld.jpg" style="max-width:550px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;
&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By &lt;a href="http://blog.internationalpractice.org/author/editor" title="View all posts by Louis M. Solomon"&gt;Louis M. Solomon&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.internationalpractice.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Tettamanti-v-Opcion.pdf"&gt;Tettamanti,
et al. v. Opcion Sociedad Anonima&lt;/a&gt;,
No. 3D11-333 (3d Dist. Ct App. Fla. July 2011</description><author>OneWorld@placeholder.com (Cadwalader OneWorld International Practice)</author><pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 22:15:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Choice of Law Determines Arbitrability; “Clear and Unmistakable” Standard Adopted; “Arising Under” Deemed a Narrow Arbitration Clause</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/11/02/choice-of-law-determines-arbitrability-clear-and-unmistakable-standard-adopted-arising-under-deemed-a-narrow-arbitration-clause.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/11/02/choice-of-law-determines-arbitrability-clear-and-unmistakable-standard-adopted-arising-under-deemed-a-narrow-arbitration-clause.aspx</guid><pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:17:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Choice of Non-U.S. Law Informs Damages Models and Amounts in FSIA Case Against Iran</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/11/02/choice-of-non-u-s-law-informs-damages-models-and-amounts-in-fsia-case-against-iran.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INTERNATIONAL-FOREIGNLAW/blogs/internationalandforeignlawblog/archive/2011/11/02/choice-of-non-u-s-law-informs-damages-models-and-amounts-in-fsia-case-against-iran.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" title="Cadwalader OneWorld International Practice Blog" href="http://blog.internationalpractice.org/%20%20%20%20"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/international-foreignlaw/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.I+_2600_+FL+Images/Cadwalader_5F00_OneWorld.jpg" style="max-width:550px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.internationalpractice.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/6th-case-Oveissi-v.-Islamic-Republic-of-Iran.pdf"&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By &lt;a href="http://blog.internationalpractice.org/author/editor" title="View all posts by Louis M. Solomon"&gt;Louis M.
Solomon&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Oveissi
v. Islamic Republic of Iran, et al.&lt;/i&gt;, 03-cv-1197 (RCL) (D.D.C.&amp;nbsp;Mar. 2011) [&lt;a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?app=00075&amp;amp;view=full&amp;amp;searchtype=get&amp;amp;search=768+F.+Supp.+2d+16&amp;amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00235" target="_blank"&gt;enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers&lt;/a</description><author>OneWorld@placeholder.com (Cadwalader OneWorld International Practice)</author><pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:52:00 -0400</pubDate></item></channel></rss>