<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Mealey's &amp; Law360 News Headlines</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/default.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Debug Build: 31031.3054)</generator><item><title>Hensel Phelps, Subcontractors Pay $8.1M To End Labor Fight</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/hensel-phelps-subcontractors-pay-8-1m-to-end-labor-fight.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:52:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">98c759fa-e010-4ef2-953f-272cd0025042:344338</guid><dc:creator>Law360: Employment</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=344338</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/hensel-phelps-subcontractors-pay-8-1m-to-end-labor-fight.aspx#comments</comments><description>The California labor commissioner said Monday more than 2,000 workers who built a Hilton hotel in San Diego will recover nearly $8.1 million in unpaid wages after the office reached an agreement in a prevailing wage case against Hensel Phelps Construction Co. and subcontractors. Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/hensel-phelps-subcontractors-pay-8-1m-to-end-labor-fight.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/aggbug.aspx?PostID=344338" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Producer Slams Saudi Prince In Suit Over Unpaid Salary</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/producer-slams-saudi-prince-in-suit-over-unpaid-salary.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:49:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">98c759fa-e010-4ef2-953f-272cd0025042:344299</guid><dc:creator>Law360: Employment</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=344299</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/producer-slams-saudi-prince-in-suit-over-unpaid-salary.aspx#comments</comments><description>Film producer Steven Saxton told a Los Angeles jury Tuesday that a Saudi prince who alleges Saxton stiffed him on commissions and other monies was not entitled to a salary for work unrelated to raising investment capital, saying the prince was &amp;ldquo;barely qualified&amp;rdquo; to be an intern. Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/producer-slams-saudi-prince-in-suit-over-unpaid-salary.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/aggbug.aspx?PostID=344299" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Ex-Tribe Accountant Wants Fraud Conspiracy Suit Dismissed</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/ex-tribe-accountant-wants-fraud-conspiracy-suit-dismissed.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:34:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">98c759fa-e010-4ef2-953f-272cd0025042:344272</guid><dc:creator>Law360: Employment</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=344272</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/ex-tribe-accountant-wants-fraud-conspiracy-suit-dismissed.aspx#comments</comments><description>The former senior accountant for the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida on Monday moved to dismiss the tribe&amp;#39;s suit in Florida state court accusing her of taking part in conspiracies to defraud the tribe of millions of dollars and revealing confidential information. Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/ex-tribe-accountant-wants-fraud-conspiracy-suit-dismissed.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/aggbug.aspx?PostID=344272" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Winston &amp; Strawn Sues Disgruntled Partner Over Legal Threats</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/winston-amp-strawn-sues-disgruntled-partner-over-legal-threats.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:31:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">98c759fa-e010-4ef2-953f-272cd0025042:344273</guid><dc:creator>Law360: Employment</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=344273</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/winston-amp-strawn-sues-disgruntled-partner-over-legal-threats.aspx#comments</comments><description>Winston &amp;amp; Strawn LLP hit a partner and former head of the firm&amp;#39;s Los Angeles labor and employment group with a suit in Illinois court Tuesday, saying the attorney violated his partnership agreement by threatening to sue the firm over a compensation dispute. Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/winston-amp-strawn-sues-disgruntled-partner-over-legal-threats.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/aggbug.aspx?PostID=344273" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Union Carbide Loses Bid To Reverse Calif. Asbestos Ruling</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/union-carbide-loses-bid-to-reverse-calif-asbestos-ruling.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:25:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">98c759fa-e010-4ef2-953f-272cd0025042:344274</guid><dc:creator>Law360: Employment</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=344274</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/union-carbide-loses-bid-to-reverse-calif-asbestos-ruling.aspx#comments</comments><description>A California appeals court affirmed Tuesday that Union Carbide Corp. is liable for a deceased construction worker&amp;#39;s mesothelioma, even though he suffered from a form of the disease typically associated with a type of asbestos not found in the company&amp;#39;s product. Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/union-carbide-loses-bid-to-reverse-calif-asbestos-ruling.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/aggbug.aspx?PostID=344274" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Abercrombie Can't Prove Hijab Hurt Sales, EEOC Says</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/abercrombie-can-t-prove-hijab-hurt-sales-eeoc-says.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:12:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">98c759fa-e010-4ef2-953f-272cd0025042:344275</guid><dc:creator>Law360: Employment</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=344275</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/abercrombie-can-t-prove-hijab-hurt-sales-eeoc-says.aspx#comments</comments><description>The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission urged a California federal judge Tuesday to find that Abercrombie &amp;amp; Fitch Stores Inc. wrongly failed to accommodate a Muslim employee&amp;#39;s headscarf, arguing that the retailer has no evidence that the worker&amp;#39;s hijab harmed its reputation or sales. Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/abercrombie-can-t-prove-hijab-hurt-sales-eeoc-says.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/aggbug.aspx?PostID=344275" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>AT&amp;T Can't Escape Field Technicians' Wage Suit</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/at-amp-t-can-t-escape-field-technicians-wage-suit.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:29:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">98c759fa-e010-4ef2-953f-272cd0025042:344276</guid><dc:creator>Law360: Employment</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=344276</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/at-amp-t-can-t-escape-field-technicians-wage-suit.aspx#comments</comments><description>An Indiana federal judge on Monday denied an attempt by units of AT&amp;amp;T Inc. to dismiss a collective action brought by 11 field technicians alleging the telecom did not properly pay for meal periods, ruling that the plaintiffs claims are strong enough to allow the case to advance. Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/at-amp-t-can-t-escape-field-technicians-wage-suit.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/aggbug.aspx?PostID=344276" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Boehner Sets Potential Roadblock For Immigration Reform</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/boehner-sets-potential-roadblock-for-immigration-reform.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:56:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">98c759fa-e010-4ef2-953f-272cd0025042:344277</guid><dc:creator>Law360: Employment</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=344277</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/boehner-sets-potential-roadblock-for-immigration-reform.aspx#comments</comments><description>House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said Tuesday that he would not bring an immigration reform package up for a vote unless it had the support of a majority of Republicans, setting a potentially high hurdle for any proposed legislation. Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/boehner-sets-potential-roadblock-for-immigration-reform.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/aggbug.aspx?PostID=344277" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>7th Circ. Throws Out Suit Over Navistar Nonunion Labor</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/7th-circ-throws-out-suit-over-navistar-nonunion-labor.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:27:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">98c759fa-e010-4ef2-953f-272cd0025042:344176</guid><dc:creator>Law360: Employment</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=344176</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/7th-circ-throws-out-suit-over-navistar-nonunion-labor.aspx#comments</comments><description>The Seventh Circuit on Tuesday tossed a lawsuit by former Navistar Inc. workers, ruling they didn&amp;#39;t provide specifics when alleging their union ignored hundreds of grievances that Navistar illegally fired them in favor of nonunionized subcontractors. Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/7th-circ-throws-out-suit-over-navistar-nonunion-labor.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/aggbug.aspx?PostID=344176" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Commerce Bank Founder Wants New Trial Over $17M Severance</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/commerce-bank-founder-wants-new-trial-over-17m-severance.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:55:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">98c759fa-e010-4ef2-953f-272cd0025042:344177</guid><dc:creator>Law360: Employment</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=344177</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/commerce-bank-founder-wants-new-trial-over-17m-severance.aspx#comments</comments><description>Commerce Bancorp LLC founder Vernon Hill II asked a New Jersey federal judge Monday for a new trial over a $17.2 million severance payment he sought after an investigation into real estate dealings led to his resignation, saying a jury instruction made jurors believe the payment was legally prohibited. Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/commerce-bank-founder-wants-new-trial-over-17m-severance.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/aggbug.aspx?PostID=344177" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Law Firm's Arbitration Clause Doesn't Cover Age Bias Claims</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/law-firm-s-arbitration-clause-doesn-t-cover-age-bias-claims.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:51:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">98c759fa-e010-4ef2-953f-272cd0025042:344178</guid><dc:creator>Law360: Employment</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=344178</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/law-firm-s-arbitration-clause-doesn-t-cover-age-bias-claims.aspx#comments</comments><description>A New Jersey appellate panel Tuesday agreed to bifurcate certain charges against a law firm accused of discriminating against an older attorney, sending counts of alleged breach of contract to arbitration while leaving the discrimination counts to be tried in court. Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/law-firm-s-arbitration-clause-doesn-t-cover-age-bias-claims.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/aggbug.aspx?PostID=344178" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Pa. McDonald's Hit With Class Action Over Debit Card Wages</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/pa-mcdonald-s-hit-with-class-action-over-debit-card-wages.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:41:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">98c759fa-e010-4ef2-953f-272cd0025042:344179</guid><dc:creator>Law360: Employment</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=344179</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/pa-mcdonald-s-hit-with-class-action-over-debit-card-wages.aspx#comments</comments><description>A Pennsylvania woman hit a McDonald&amp;rsquo;s franchisee with a putative class action in state court on Thursday, alleging that the employer violated state laws by paying employees solely via debit cards. Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/pa-mcdonald-s-hit-with-class-action-over-debit-card-wages.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/aggbug.aspx?PostID=344179" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Minority Reps. Raise Concerns About DOL Fiduciary Rule</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/minority-reps-raise-concerns-about-dol-fiduciary-rule.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:11:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">98c759fa-e010-4ef2-953f-272cd0025042:344115</guid><dc:creator>Law360: Employment</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=344115</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/minority-reps-raise-concerns-about-dol-fiduciary-rule.aspx#comments</comments><description>Members of U.S. congressional minority caucuses on Friday expressed concerns that the U.S. Department of Labor&amp;#39;s plan to repropose controversial regulations broadening the definition of &amp;quot;fiduciary&amp;quot; under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act could actually disadvantage those the agency is trying to help. Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/minority-reps-raise-concerns-about-dol-fiduciary-rule.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/aggbug.aspx?PostID=344115" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cancer Testing Co. Blasts False Claims Suit As 'Speculation'</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/cancer-testing-co-blasts-false-claims-suit-as-speculation.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:09:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">98c759fa-e010-4ef2-953f-272cd0025042:344116</guid><dc:creator>Law360: Employment</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=344116</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/cancer-testing-co-blasts-false-claims-suit-as-speculation.aspx#comments</comments><description>Cancer diagnostic company Caris Life Sciences Inc. told a Texas federal court Monday that allegations that it overbilled Medicare and gave hospitals kickbacks were based on &amp;quot;mistaken assumptions and speculation&amp;quot; from former employees who couldn&amp;#39;t possibly have known about any false claims. Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/cancer-testing-co-blasts-false-claims-suit-as-speculation.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/aggbug.aspx?PostID=344116" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Dignity Health Blasts ERISA Suit Over $1.2B Pension Shortfall</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/dignity-health-blasts-erisa-suit-over-1-2b-pension-shortfall.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:16:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">98c759fa-e010-4ef2-953f-272cd0025042:344065</guid><dc:creator>Law360: Employment</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=344065</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/dignity-health-blasts-erisa-suit-over-1-2b-pension-shortfall.aspx#comments</comments><description>Dignity Health on Monday asked a California judge to dismiss a putative class action alleging that the health care conglomerate underfunded its pension plans by $1.2 billion, arguing its status as a religious institution exempts it from the law. Read More......(&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/blogs/mealeys/archive/2013/06/18/dignity-health-blasts-erisa-suit-over-1-2b-pension-shortfall.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/labor-employment-law/aggbug.aspx?PostID=344065" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>