﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../StyleSheet/rss.xsl"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Litigation Resource Community E-Discovery</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/litigationresourcecenter</link><description>Litigation Resource Community, LexisNexis</description><copyright>http://www.lexisnexis.com/terms/copyright.aspx</copyright><atom:link href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/litigationresourcecenter/Rss.aspx?id=467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>E-Discovery Checkpoints Part 3</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2013/05/01/e-discovery-checkpoints-part-3.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2013/05/01/e-discovery-checkpoints-part-3.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images/cityScape.jpg" style="max-width:550px;border:0;float:left;margin:12px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;E-Discovery Checkpoints:&amp;nbsp; A
360-Degree View-Part 3&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Identifying, Assembling and Sorting
the Data From the Inside&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;By
Susan Winchurch, J.D. &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In complex litigation involving discoverable
documents numbering in the tens of thousands, the first critical steps in the
discovery process are taken in-house. &lt;i&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LexisNexis recently assembled four speakers for a
Webinar to address the critical early stages of discovery, presenting the
perspectives of a U.S. Magistrate Judge, an experienced e-discovery litigator,
a corporate data security executive and a litigation technology expert, in a
complex hypothetical</description><author>dan.johnson@lexisnexis.com (Dan Johnson)</author><pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 15:00:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Federal Judge Orders Defendant to Hire a Vendor</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2013/05/01/federal-judge-orders-defendant-to-hire-a-vendor.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2013/05/01/federal-judge-orders-defendant-to-hire-a-vendor.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/ediscovery/162449483_5F00_Judges-Order-75x75.jpg"&gt;&lt;img border="0" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/ediscovery/162449483_5F00_Judges-Order-75x75.jpg" style="border:0;float:left;margin:12px;" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Having &amp;quot;Difficulty&amp;quot;
Complying with Discovery Orders? Then Get-&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;And Pay-&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;For an E-Discovery
Vendor, Court Says&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In case anyone didn&amp;#39;t get the memo, please be aware that
just because you don&amp;#39;t have the data, it doesn&amp;#39;t mean you don&amp;#39;t control it and
can&amp;#39;t produce it. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In yet another example of magistrate judges taking the lead
in the use of e-discovery vendors and</description><author>dan.johnson@lexisnexis.com (Dan Johnson)</author><pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 16:18:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>What Infinite E-Discovery Searches Need is a Reboot, Not Kumbaya</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2013/05/01/what-infinite-e-discovery-searches-need-is-a-reboot-not-kumbaya.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2013/05/01/what-infinite-e-discovery-searches-need-is-a-reboot-not-kumbaya.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/ediscovery/Infintite-e_2D00_discovery-desert.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="border:0;float:left;margin:12px;" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/ediscovery/Infintite-e_2D00_discovery-desert.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You&amp;#39;ve been tromping through the desert for days. &amp;nbsp;Your skin is
starting to look like a forgotten hot dog on a backyard grill. &amp;nbsp;Parched,
you think you could drink a swimming pools worth of water. &amp;nbsp;But somewhere
between a glass of water and a thousand gallons, you&amp;#39;ve had enough. &amp;nbsp;Drink
too much and you will simply drown. &amp;nbsp;It&amp;#39;s important to know when it is
time to say, &amp;quot;That was refreshing. &amp;nbsp;I&amp;#39;m done. &amp;nbsp;Please pass the
Solarcaine&lt;strong</description><author>dan.johnson@lexisnexis.com (Dan Johnson)</author><pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 16:17:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Controlling E-Discovery Costs in a Big Data World</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2013/05/01/controlling-e-discovery-costs-in-a-dig-data-world.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2013/05/01/controlling-e-discovery-costs-in-a-dig-data-world.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/ediscovery/162488938-Big-Data-75-X-75.jpg"&gt;&lt;img border="0" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/ediscovery/162488938-Big-Data-75-X-75.jpg" style="border:0;float:left;margin:12px;" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Legal IT
professionals are all too aware that
the task of managing large mountains of data has always been a defining
characteristic of our industry. Now that we&amp;#39;ve had to layer on the explosion of
digital and social media content, we&amp;#39;ve got a whole new set of challenges in
front of us. The attorneys we support are looking to us for new approaches to
help them make sense of all this data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The World of Big Data&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In particular, lawyers are taking
greater notice of the legal, ethical and technological</description><author>dan.johnson@lexisnexis.com (Dan Johnson)</author><pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 16:17:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Big Data: What It Is And What It's Good For </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/e-discovery/archive/2013/04/23/big-data-what-it-is-and-what-it-s-good-for.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/e-discovery/archive/2013/04/23/big-data-what-it-is-and-what-it-s-good-for.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images/ContentImage_5F00_Software.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images/ContentImage_5F00_Software.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are you or your outside law firms using data analytics to identify profitability of individuals or specific matters? Or to support or refute claims and allegations? Or to spot and exploit trends and opportunities? While definitions may vary, these are some of the things made possible by &amp;quot;big data,&amp;quot; according to legal and technical experts who shared their insights during a one-hour panel discussion hosted by LexisNexis&amp;reg; Litigation Solutions at LegalTech&amp;reg; New York on Jan. 30, 2013. Speaking to a packed conference room, the panel comprised four thought leaders who were moderated by nationally</description><author>LexisNexisLitigationResourceCenter@x.com (LexisNexis Litigation Resource Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:53:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Predictive Coding: A Primer</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/e-discovery/archive/2013/03/25/predictive-coding-a-primer.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/e-discovery/archive/2013/03/25/predictive-coding-a-primer.aspx</guid><description>&lt;h1&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:x-small;"&gt;By Amy Jane Longo and Usama Kahf&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;[Editor&amp;#39;s Note: Amy Longo is a partner at O&amp;#39;Melveny &amp;amp; Myers LLP and a member of the Firm&amp;#39;s Financial Services and Electronic Discovery and Document Retention Practices. Usama Kahf is an associate and a member of the Firm&amp;#39;s Labor and Employment Pratice. Both are resident in O&amp;#39;Melveny&amp;#39;s Los Angeles office. The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of O&amp;#39;Melveny or its clients, and should not be relied upon as legal advice. Copyright &amp;copy; 2013 by Amy Jane Longo and Usama Kahf. Responses to this commentary are welcome.]&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Having gained judicial approval - or acknowledgement - in fewer than a handful of cases, the method for collecting and reviewing electronic documents for discovery known as &amp;quot;predictive coding&amp;quot; appears to be &amp;quot;trending&amp;quot; - to borrow a term from social media culture. One way to</description><author>LexisNexisLitigationResourceCenter@x.com (LexisNexis Litigation Resource Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:23:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>To Define “Data Privacy,” You Will Need a Map, a Calendar and a Clock</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2013/03/15/to-define-data-privacy-you-will-need-a-map-a-calendar-and-a-clock.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2013/03/15/to-define-data-privacy-you-will-need-a-map-a-calendar-and-a-clock.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/ediscovery/155270149_2D00_clock.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/ediscovery/155270149_2D00_clock.jpg" style="border:0;float:left;margin:12px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;What is &amp;quot;data privacy&amp;quot;? &amp;nbsp;It is a lot like asking what &amp;quot;food&amp;quot; is. &amp;nbsp;The answer depends on where you are, who you are, what time it is and how hungry you are. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Breakfast in Japan often comprises miso soup, grilled fish and white rice. &amp;nbsp;In America it might be eggs, bacon, toast or Rice Krispies. &amp;nbsp;Menu items leading up to Medieval times would turn your stomach. &amp;nbsp;Ask today&amp;#39;s food editor at &lt;i&gt;The&lt;/i&gt; &lt;i&gt;New York Times&lt;/i&gt;&amp;reg;&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;and an 18th century native of the South Pacific and you will get</description><author>LexisNexisLitigationResourceCenter@x.com (LexisNexis Litigation Resource Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:58:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>E-Discovery Checkpoints:  A 360-Degree View – Part 2: The Lawyer’s Perspective</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2013/03/01/e-discovery-checkpoints-a-360-degree-view-part-2-the-lawyer-s-perspective.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2013/03/01/e-discovery-checkpoints-a-360-degree-view-part-2-the-lawyer-s-perspective.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images/cityScape.jpg" style="max-width:550px;border:0;float:left;margin:12px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When it comes to network hacking, corporate espionage, intellectual property theft and managing massive volumes of data in a multi-million-dollar business dispute, everyone can pretty much plan to check their joysticks at the door.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;LexisNexis recently assembled four speakers to address the critical early stages of discovery, presenting the perspectives of a U.S. Magistrate Judge, an experienced e-discovery litigator, a corporate data security executive and a litigation technology expert, in a complex case involving a dizzying volume of potentially discoverable information. This is the second in a four-part series covering what the speakers had to say.&amp;nbsp; This article will address the role of the attorney in the process-from preservation</description><author>LexisNexisLitigationResourceCenter@x.com (LexisNexis Litigation Resource Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 11:52:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Big Data &amp; E-Discovery:  Your New Resource in Telling a Better Story</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2013/03/01/big-data-amp-e-discovery-your-new-resource-in-telling-a-better-story.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2013/03/01/big-data-amp-e-discovery-your-new-resource-in-telling-a-better-story.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/ediscovery/94231898_2D00_servers.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/ediscovery/94231898_2D00_servers.jpg" style="float:left;margin:12px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Are you using data analytics to identify profitability of individuals or specific matters? &amp;nbsp;Or to support or refute claims and allegations? &amp;nbsp;Or to spot and exploit trends and opportunities? &amp;nbsp;While definitions may vary, these are some of the things made possible by &amp;quot;big data,&amp;quot; according to legal and technical experts who shared their insights during a panel discussion hosted by LexisNexis&amp;reg; Litigation Solutions at LegalTech&amp;reg; New York on Jan. 30, 2013. &amp;nbsp;Speaking to a packed conference room, the panel comprised four thought leaders who were</description><author>LexisNexisLitigationResourceCenter@x.com (LexisNexis Litigation Resource Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 11:48:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>William A. Ruskin: Predictive Coding: Will E-Discovery Swallow The Judicial System?</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/e-discovery/archive/2013/02/05/william-a-ruskin-predictive-coding-will-e-discovery-swallow-the-judicial-system.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/e-discovery/archive/2013/02/05/william-a-ruskin-predictive-coding-will-e-discovery-swallow-the-judicial-system.aspx</guid><description>&lt;h3&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/immigration-law/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Contributor+Spotlight+Authors/William-Ruskin_5F00_130x112.jpg" border="0" style="max-width:550px;" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;By William A. Ruskin&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In an&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.toxictortlitigationblog.com/2012/02/tags/predictive-coding/computers-replacing-lawyers-in-reviewing-documents/"&gt;earlier article&lt;/a&gt;, we discussed the significance of Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Peck&amp;#39;s (SDNY) opinion in&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14321028911110316417&amp;amp;q=Da+Silva+Moore+v.+Publicis+Groupe+&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;as_sdt=2,5"&gt;Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;[&lt;a href="http://www.lexis.com/xlink?showcidslinks=on&amp;amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00271&amp;amp;searchtype=get&amp;amp;search=2012%20U.S.%20Dist.%20LEXIS%2083659&amp;amp;view=full"&gt;enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers&lt;/a&gt;], a highly publicized decision that approved of the use of</description><author>wruskin@placeholder.com (William A. Ruskin)</author><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 16:53:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Insurer’s Contractual Access To Agent Files Qualifies As Control Under FRCP 34 </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2013/02/01/insurer-s-contractual-access-to-agent-files-qualifies-as-control-under-frcp-34.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2013/02/01/insurer-s-contractual-access-to-agent-files-qualifies-as-control-under-frcp-34.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/ediscovery-newsletter/100547252_2D00_sign.jpg" border="0" style="max-width:550px;border:0;float:left;margin:12px;" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The contractual right to something-even if you don&amp;#39;t have it in your hands-can qualify as possession, custody and control.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/strong&gt;This is how the U.S. District Court for New Jersey saw it recently in holding that the contractual right to have access and control over independent title insurance agent files, even without physical possession, was enough to establish &amp;quot;possession, custody, and control&amp;quot; under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34. &amp;nbsp;The court determined that First American Title Insurance Company was required, therefore, to instruct its agents to preserve those documents.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;</description><author>LexisNexisLitigationResourceCenter@x.com (LexisNexis Litigation Resource Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 13:21:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>There Is Nothing Like The Real Thing: Copied And Pasted Data Insufficient Under Rule 34, Court Rules</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2013/02/01/there-is-nothing-like-the-real-thing-copied-and-pasted-data-insufficient-under-rule-34-court-rules.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2013/02/01/there-is-nothing-like-the-real-thing-copied-and-pasted-data-insufficient-under-rule-34-court-rules.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/ediscovery-newsletter/146751346_2D00_paper.jpg" border="0" style="max-width:550px;border:0;float:left;margin:12px;" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When you&amp;#39;re expecting a swell gift-and when only a name brand will do-it is hard to fake a smile of gratitude when you tear off the wrapping paper to reveal your brand new R-Manny suit. You look at it in dim light and without your glasses. You try to convince yourself it&amp;#39;s just as good. But as you stand there, trying to imagine convenient applications of a jacket with one sleeve that is four inches longer than the other, you know there is nothing doing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A litigant seeking data in this discovery story probably felt the same way. And so did the court. One hundred pages of printed material, consisting of an email document containing copied and pasted materials excerpted from blog and website</description><author>LexisNexisLitigationResourceCenter@x.com (LexisNexis Litigation Resource Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 12:01:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>In A Lurid Story Of E-Discovery And Ham, Magistrate Judge Tells Parties To Pay For A Forensic Expert To Sort Through The Data </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2013/02/01/in-a-lurid-story-of-e-discovery-and-ham-a-magistrate-judge-tells-parties-to-pay-for-a-forensic-expert-to-sort-through-the-data.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2013/02/01/in-a-lurid-story-of-e-discovery-and-ham-a-magistrate-judge-tells-parties-to-pay-for-a-forensic-expert-to-sort-through-the-data.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/ediscovery-newsletter/78364746_2D00_HAM.jpg" border="0" style="max-width:550px;border:0;float:left;margin:12px;" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In case you read the &lt;i&gt;E-Discovery Brief&lt;/i&gt; to your kids at night, please be aware that this article contains sexual content not suitable for children under the age of, well, it&amp;#39;s just not suitable.&amp;nbsp;This is a story that involves sexual harassment, text messages, amorous Facebook&lt;sup&gt;&amp;reg;&lt;/sup&gt; musings, foul language, and ham-ham that is smoked for more than 20 hours &amp;quot;then finished with a sweet crunchy glaze.&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp; Also, this story involves electronic discovery.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In this story, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) brought claims against the Original HoneyBaked Ham Company of Georgia, Inc.&amp;nbsp;HoneyBaked allegedly subjected female employees to sexual harassment and retaliated</description><author>LexisNexisLitigationResourceCenter@x.com (LexisNexis Litigation Resource Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 11:58:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Covington &amp; Burling LLP: Electronic Discovery in Insurance Coverage Litigation </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/e-discovery/archive/2013/01/23/covington-amp-burling-llp-electronic-discovery-in-insurance-coverage-litigation.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/e-discovery/archive/2013/01/23/covington-amp-burling-llp-electronic-discovery-in-insurance-coverage-litigation.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INSURANCELAW/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Contributor+Spotlight+Authors/Benjamin-Duke-130x112.jpg" border="0" style="max-width:550px;" alt="" /&gt; &lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/INSURANCELAW/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Contributor+Spotlight+Authors/Mari-Bonthuis-130x112.jpg" border="0" style="max-width:550px;" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;By P. Benjamin Duke and Mari K. Bonthuis, Attorneys, Covington &amp;amp; Burling LLP&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description><author>LexisNexisLitigationResourceCenter@x.com (LexisNexis Litigation Resource Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:36:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Apple® Products: Sturdy Security, PC Differences Require Special Attention in Discovery</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2013/01/13/apple-174-products-sturdy-security-pc-differences-require-special-attention-in-discovery.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2013/01/13/apple-174-products-sturdy-security-pc-differences-require-special-attention-in-discovery.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-width:550px;border:0;float:left;margin:12px;" border="0" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images/apple.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It seems like they have been around much longer, but the first iPod&lt;sup&gt;&amp;reg;&lt;/sup&gt; was released by Apple&lt;sup&gt; &lt;/sup&gt;Inc. in November of 2001. Suddenly many consumers were using a product made by the maker of Mac&lt;sup&gt;&amp;reg;&lt;/sup&gt; computers, loved by the likes of artists, designers and educators-but not the average cubicle jockey or corporate exec. That was the domain of Windows&lt;sup&gt;&amp;reg;&lt;/sup&gt; &amp;nbsp;PCs. As people came to love their iPod&lt;sup&gt;&amp;reg;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/sup&gt;digital devices they became more familiar with the Apple way of doing things. At the same time, cross-platform compatibility barriers were coming down, meaning a PC user could buy a Mac and no longer feel like she was trying to plug her TV into a tree.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Attend any legal conference</description><author>LexisNexisLitigationResourceCenter@x.com (LexisNexis Litigation Resource Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 14:20:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>E-Discovery Checkpoints: A 360-Degree View-Part 1</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2013/01/13/e-discovery-checkpoints-a-360-degree-view-part-1.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2013/01/13/e-discovery-checkpoints-a-360-degree-view-part-1.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="max-width:550px;border:0;float:left;margin:12px;" border="0" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images/cityScape.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any image of a judge luxuriating on the bench like a silent referee on the elevated sidelines of the proceedings quickly melts away like tiny birthday candles when it comes to electronic discovery. To use a boxing metaphor, judges are clearly the &amp;quot;third man (or woman) in the ring,&amp;quot; intent on making sure the fight doesn&amp;#39;t get out of hand.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What boundaries are in place and what questions are asked early in the life of a case will prove critical to keep the proceedings in general-and costs in particular-from going through the roof. LexisNexis recently assembled four speakers to address the critical early stages of discovery, presenting the perspectives of a U.S. Magistrate Judge, an experienced e-discovery attorney, a corporate</description><author>LexisNexisLitigationResourceCenter@x.com (LexisNexis Litigation Resource Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 14:13:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Outbreak of Reason Reported in Northern District of California: New E-Discovery Guidelines Released</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2013/01/13/outbreak-of-reason-reported-in-northern-district-of-california-new-e-discovery-guidelines-released.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2013/01/13/outbreak-of-reason-reported-in-northern-district-of-california-new-e-discovery-guidelines-released.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images/Handshake.jpg" border="0" style="max-width:550px;border:0;float:left;margin:12px;" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;American litigators in high-stakes cases can be aggressive, clever, passionate, smart and, if necessary, ruthless. And costs be damned! It&amp;#39;s how they roll. In fact, some people who study these things say that the testosterone levels of trial attorneys-males and females alike-are higher than their friends (or enemies) who don&amp;#39;t go to court. It&amp;#39;s all that aggression and passion! Even during some saliva tests, trial attorneys reportedly spat with greater enthusiasm and regular Joes and Janes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But in some corners of the judicial system there seems to be an outbreak of reason and calm infecting our rancorous courtrooms which we&amp;#39;re so proud of. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes, participants in the ongoing campaign to bring some</description><author>LexisNexisLitigationResourceCenter@x.com (LexisNexis Litigation Resource Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 14:12:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Use Predictive Coding and Get an E-Discovery Vendor, Judge Says, Or Tell Me Why You Shouldn't</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2012/12/03/use-predictive-coding-and-get-an-e-discovery-vendor-judge-says-or-tell-me-why-you-shouldn-t.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2012/12/03/use-predictive-coding-and-get-an-e-discovery-vendor-judge-says-or-tell-me-why-you-shouldn-t.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images/judge.jpg" border="0" style="max-width:550px;border:0;float:left;margin:12px;" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Years ago, humorous writer Fran Lebowitz was asked about criticism of a judge overseeing one of the highest profile murder trials of all time. The jurist was taking heat for what people viewed as a laid back or merely observant role in the courtroom, allegedly enthralled by the performances of the legendary trial lawyers in his midst. True or not (probably not) there it was. When asked for her take, Ms. Lebowitz said, &amp;quot;He didn&amp;#39;t want to look like he was judging anyone. He didn&amp;#39;t want to come off as judgmental. I mean, who is he to judge?&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But appearing to be judgmental certainly was not the case recently when it came to judging the value and validity of predictive coding and electronic discovery vendors. Hon. J. Travis</description><author>LexisNexisLitigationResourceCenter@x.com (LexisNexis Litigation Resource Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 17:55:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>U.S. Judge Says Plaintiff's Litigation Hold Doesn't Pass Smell Test, Directs It to Pay for Spoliation Probe</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2012/12/03/u-s-judge-says-plaintiff-s-litigation-hold-doesn-t-pass-smell-test-directs-it-to-pay-for-spoliation-probe.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2012/12/03/u-s-judge-says-plaintiff-s-litigation-hold-doesn-t-pass-smell-test-directs-it-to-pay-for-spoliation-probe.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images/candle.jpg%20" border="0" style="max-width:550px;border:0;float:left;margin:12px;" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Will your litigation hold meet a judge&amp;#39;s expectations? And if not, what are the potential consequences? Are you looking at sanctions or millions of dollars&amp;#39; worth of forensic discovery? To get a glimpse of at least one federal court&amp;#39;s view on this, we look to the Oct. 2, 2012, decision in &lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;Scentsy v. B.R. Chase&lt;/span&gt; handed down by Hon. B. Lynn Winmill, Chief District Judge of the U.S. District of Idaho (No. 1:11-cv-00249-BLW, Oct. 2, 2012; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143633) [&lt;a href="http://www.lexis.com/xlink?showcidslinks=on&amp;amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00271&amp;amp;searchtype=get&amp;amp;search=2012%20U.S.%20Dist.%20LEXIS%20143633&amp;amp;view=full"&gt;enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers&lt;/a&gt;].&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;</description><author>LexisNexisLitigationResourceCenter@x.com (LexisNexis Litigation Resource Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 17:43:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>You May Occupy Your Twitter Account, But Do You Own It?</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2012/12/03/you-may-occupy-your-twitter-account-but-do-you-own-it.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2012/12/03/you-may-occupy-your-twitter-account-but-do-you-own-it.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images/tweet.jpg" border="0" style="max-width:550px;border:0;float:left;margin:12px;" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If&amp;nbsp; recent developments in New York Criminal Court are any indication, your social media, email and SMS texts are just as vulnerable to exposure as everyone has been saying they are. Such a trend is bad news for bloggers, tweeters and texters, but may be good news if you are a litigant trying to gain access to social media data to support your case.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In this case - &lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;People v. Harris&lt;/span&gt;&lt;i&gt;, &lt;/i&gt;No. 2011NY080152, 2012 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1871 (Crim. Ct. N.Y. Apr. 20, 2012) [&lt;a href="http://www.lexis.com/xlink?showcidslinks=on&amp;amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00271&amp;amp;searchtype=get&amp;amp;search=2012%20N.Y.%20Misc.%20LEXIS%201871%20&amp;amp;view=full"&gt;enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers&lt;/a&gt;] </description><author>LexisNexisLitigationResourceCenter@x.com (LexisNexis Litigation Resource Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 17:32:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Troutman Sanders LLP: 'Waive'-ing Goodbye To Privilege Protection</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/e-discovery/archive/2012/11/13/troutman-sanders-llp-waive-ing-goodbye-to-privilege-protection.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/e-discovery/archive/2012/11/13/troutman-sanders-llp-waive-ing-goodbye-to-privilege-protection.aspx</guid><description>&lt;h1&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Author+Thumbnails/Troutman-Sanders-Information-Intersection_5F00_500x105.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Author+Thumbnails/Troutman-Sanders-Information-Intersection_5F00_500x105.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The attorney-client and work product privileges are some of the oldest and most important evidentiary privileges in our legal system. The attorney-client privilege, in particular, is regarded by some as almost &amp;quot;sacred.&amp;quot; Given their importance, you would think that these privileges would be closely safeguarded by attorneys and litigants - and, generally, they are. However, safeguarding these privileges is not always an easy task. As recent cases have shown, this is particularly true when electronic discovery</description><author>Troutman.Sanders@placeholder.com (Troutman Sanders)</author><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 17:01:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>New Version Of LexisNexis Early Data Analyzer Features Enhanced Tools To Filter Out Files Not Relevant To E-Discovery </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/e-discovery/archive/2012/11/13/new-version-of-lexisnexis-early-data-analyzer-features-enhanced-tools-to-filter-out-files-not-relevant-to-e-discovery.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/e-discovery/archive/2012/11/13/new-version-of-lexisnexis-early-data-analyzer-features-enhanced-tools-to-filter-out-files-not-relevant-to-e-discovery.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Other improvements include new user audit log for better monitoring of workflow, faster exporting of files and improved OCR tool&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/emergingissues/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Author+Thumbnails/lexisnexis_2D00_logo_2D00_335x189.png" border="0" style="max-width:550px;" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NEW YORK, November 13, 2012&lt;b&gt; &lt;/b&gt;- LexisNexis&amp;reg; Legal &amp;amp; Professional (&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/"&gt;www.lexisnexis.com&lt;/a&gt;), a leading global provider of content and technology solutions, today announced the release of LexisNexis&lt;sup&gt;&amp;reg;&lt;/sup&gt; Early Data Analyzer 1.2, an enhanced version of its electronic discovery software that includes new tools to help litigation professionals reduce costs by filtering irrelevant documents from the discovery process.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Launched in 2011, LexisNexis Early Data Analyzer enables litigation teams to quickly capture an entire document set</description><author>LexisNexisLitigationResourceCenter@x.com (LexisNexis Litigation Resource Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:44:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>The Litigation Data Avalanche: Time To Move To The Cloud?</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2012/11/06/the-litigation-data-avalanche-time-to-move-to-the-cloud.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2012/11/06/the-litigation-data-avalanche-time-to-move-to-the-cloud.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;By Matthew Gillis and Steven Berrent&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;img border="0" style="max-width:550px;border:0;float:left;margin:12px;" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images/cloudcomputing_5F00_62455531_5F00_75x75.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;
For those of us who are trying to look down the road and see where the litigation technology industry is headed, it might be instructive to take a look back in time to an unlikely example: the law firm mailroom. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;Virtually every law firm started out with a small area somewhere in the office for managing the outgoing and incoming mail, package shipments and other related support services. For many firms, at some point in their growth trajectory</description><author>LexisNexisLitigationResourceCenter@x.com (LexisNexis Litigation Resource Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 18:20:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>FTC Rules Get E-Discovery Makeover This Month</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2012/11/06/ftc-rules-get-e-discovery-makeover-this-month.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2012/11/06/ftc-rules-get-e-discovery-makeover-this-month.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img border="0" style="max-width:550px;border:0;float:left;margin:12px;" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images/BadTie_5F00_119924594_5F00_75x75.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align="left" class="MsoBodyText"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:&amp;#39;Cambria&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;serif&amp;#39;;mso-ascii-theme-font:major-latin;mso-hansi-theme-font:major-latin;"&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align="left"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;When really broad neckties went out of style, one solution might have been to take a pair of scissors to them and snip them to a modern-day width. Smarter guys might simply have taken them to a tailor. Others might have made them into kites. But most guys simply purchased new ties, kept wearing the fat ones in case they came flapping back into style, or they stopped wearing the contraptions altogether in the present Age of Informality.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align="left</description><author>LexisNexisLitigationResourceCenter@x.com (LexisNexis Litigation Resource Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 18:20:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Disclosing Review Methods </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2012/11/06/disclosing-review-methods.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/blogs/ediscovery/archive/2012/11/06/disclosing-review-methods.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img border="0" style="max-width:550px;border:0;float:left;margin:12px;" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LITIGATIONRESOURCECENTER/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images/NestingDolls_5F00_122432379_5F00_75x75.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;Litigation can be a lot like those Russian matryoshka dolls. You know, the kind where you open one to find another, and another and another, etc.?&amp;nbsp; This happens in litigation, when the parties lock horns over the search methods they will employ in e-discovery.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;In the past, these disputes may have centered around opinions on what discovery techniques are best. However, with today&amp;#39;s computer-assisted review technologies-which can examine infinitely more material than humans ever could-the risks of breaching attorney-client privilege</description><author>LexisNexisLitigationResourceCenter@x.com (LexisNexis Litigation Resource Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 18:19:00 -0400</pubDate></item></channel></rss>