﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../StyleSheet/rss.xsl"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Litigation Resource Community Legal Technology</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/litigationresourcecenter</link><description>Litigation Resource Community, LexisNexis</description><copyright>http://www.lexisnexis.com/terms/copyright.aspx</copyright><atom:link href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/litigationresourcecenter/Rss.aspx?id=500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Litigation Data Avalanche: Time To Move To The Cloud?</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2012/10/12/the-litigation-data-avalanche-time-to-move-to-the-cloud.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2012/10/12/the-litigation-data-avalanche-time-to-move-to-the-cloud.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Legal+Business/cloudcomputing_5F00_62455531.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="border:0;float:left;margin:12px;" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/LEGALBUSINESS/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Legal+Business/cloudcomputing_5F00_62455531.jpg" border="0" height="238" width="300" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;By Matthew Gillis and Steven Berrent&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For those of us who are trying to look down the road and see where the litigation technology industry is headed, it might be instructive to take a look back in time to an unlikely example: the law firm mailroom. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Virtually every law firm started out with a small area somewhere in the office for managing the outgoing and incoming mail, package shipments and other related support services. For many firms, at some point in their growth trajectory, the mailroom became a resource-intensive</description><author>LexisNexisLitigationResourceCenter@x.com (LexisNexis Litigation Resource Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 16:19:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>3 Untold Advantages of Working at a Small Law Firm</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2012/06/18/three-untold-advantages-of-working-at-a-small-law-firm.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2012/06/18/three-untold-advantages-of-working-at-a-small-law-firm.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/PORTAL/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images/ContentImage_2D00_BooksAndGlasses.jpg" border="0" style="max-width:550px;border:0;float:left;margin:12px;" alt="" /&gt;A lot of attorneys, paralegals, and legal staff aspire to be part of a huge operation with dozens of attorneys and a star-power name.&amp;nbsp; But owning your own small law firm - or choosing to be a part of a smaller-scale operation - has a number of advantages over being part of a large legal group.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While many people who work in the legal field wouldn&amp;#39;t give up their positions in megafirms for anything, employees and owners of smaller operations are quick to tout the benefits of their situations.&amp;nbsp; The right choice for you depends on your personal outlook, career goals, and ability to adapt to your surroundings.&amp;nbsp; Think about these untold perks to working at a small law firm.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Intimacy.&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; Today&amp;#39;s huge law</description><author>LexisNexisLitigationResourceCenter@x.com (LexisNexis Litigation Resource Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:06:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Facebook Confesses Failure to Comply with Privacy Laws </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/12/01/facebook-confesses-failure-to-comply-with-privacy-laws.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/12/01/facebook-confesses-failure-to-comply-with-privacy-laws.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/IDEAS/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x1000/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/lexisnexis/facebook_5F00_59224768.jpg" border="0" height="261" width="348" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After the US government filed
charges that Facebook violated US privacy law, &lt;a href="http://ftc.gov/opa/2011/11/privacysettlement.shtm"&gt;Facebook finally
confessed that it failed to protect the privacy &lt;/a&gt;of its 800 million active
users. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) welcomes the public to &lt;a href="https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/facebookconsent/"&gt;submit comments
on the settlement through December 30, 2011&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Under the proposed consent order,
which does not include any fines, Facebook is:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;barred
from making misrepresentations about the privacy or security of consumers&amp;#39;
personal information;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;required
to obtain consumers&amp;#39; affirmative express consent before enacting changes that
override their privacy</description><author>pvogel@gardere.com (Peter S. Vogel)</author><pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 10:10:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Why Google Places is important for a Law Firm</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/11/30/why-google-places-is-important-for-a-law-firm.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/11/30/why-google-places-is-important-for-a-law-firm.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/IDEAS/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x1000/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/lexisnexis/google_2D00_places_2D00_for_2D00_law_2D00_firm.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When you last performed a search on
Google did you notice that several of the results were displayed on a
corresponding map? If you simply attributed this to the genius of Google then
you&amp;#39;ve ignored a powerful tool that can help gain your firm greater
recognition.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Becoming registered in Google places
can be a great proactive way of reaching millions of users quickly and for
free. Searching for businesses online is now more common than any other method.
This makes it ever more important for your firm to be found easily online. With
Google places you can create a listing for your firm in just a few minutes with
added extras such as photos, descriptions, videos, coupon offerings, and other
details that will encourage potential clients to contact</description><author>ryan@legalwebexperts.com (Ryan Nelson)</author><pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:15:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>How to Improve Search Results on Google </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/11/28/how-to-improve-search-results-on-google.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/11/28/how-to-improve-search-results-on-google.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/IDEAS/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x1000/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/lexisnexis/Google_5F00_logo.jpg" border="0" height="162" width="421" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pew Research recently reported that &lt;a href="http://www.vogelitlawblog.com/2011/08/articles/ecommerce/65-of-all-adults-use-social-media/"&gt;92%
of adults use search engines daily &lt;/a&gt;and ComScore recently reported that &lt;a href="http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2011/11/comScore_Releases_October_2011_U.S._Search_Engine_Rankings"&gt;65.6%
of all US searches are conducted on Google&lt;/a&gt;. So I thought I would pass along
Hack College&amp;#39;s recommendations about how to &amp;quot;&lt;a href="http://www.hackcollege.com/blog/2011/11/23/infographic-get-more-out-of-google.html"&gt;Get
More Out of Google&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;quot; Here are some search pointers that may improve your
use of &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/"&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;WHAT YOU WANT:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;i&gt;NY</description><author>pvogel@gardere.com (Peter S. Vogel)</author><pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 09:10:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Google Co-Founder Gives $500,000 to Wikimedia Foundation </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/11/21/google-co-founder-gives-500-000-to-wikimedia-foundation.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/11/21/google-co-founder-gives-500-000-to-wikimedia-foundation.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/IDEAS/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x1000/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/lexisnexis/135px_2D00_Wikimedia_5F00_Foundation.png" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since the &lt;a href="http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Home"&gt;Wikimedia Foundation (home of
Wikipedia) is a not-for-profit&lt;/a&gt;, it survives by annual fundraisers. Google
co-founder Sergey Brin and his wife Anne Wojcicki (23andMe co-founder) used
their Brin Wojcicki Foundation to grant $500,000 to the Wikimedia Foundation.
The Wikimedia Foundation kicked off its 8th annual fundraiser on November 16,
2011 and raised $1.2 million the first day.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Most people don&amp;#39;t realize that
unlike most other Social Media sites, the Wikimedia Foundation is not
generating profits rather it relies on contributions.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The Wikimedia
Foundation is a 501(c)(3) for tax purposes. That means the Wikimedia Foundation
does not operate to make a profit and</description><author>pvogel@gardere.com (Peter S. Vogel)</author><pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:30:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>TechLaw10: How Not To Become An Accidental Cyber Outlaw</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/11/16/techlaw10-how-not-to-become-an-accidental-cyber-outlaw.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/11/16/techlaw10-how-not-to-become-an-accidental-cyber-outlaw.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/IDEAS/resized-image.ashx/__size/545x1000/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/lexisnexis/techlaw10.jpg" style="max-height:1000px;max-width:550px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TechLaw10 hosts Jonathan Armstrong and Eric Sinrod discuss legal issues
related to information technology.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In this episode, Jonathan and Eric discuss recent research from &lt;a target="_blank" title="knowthenet" href="http://www.knowthenet.org.uk/"&gt;knowthenet
&lt;/a&gt;which finds that on average only 44% of UK internet users were able to
correctly identify illegal activity on the internet when presented with a range
of possible scenarios including defamation, copyright infringement and hacking.
They also talk about an &lt;a target="_blank" title="accidental outlaw" href="http://accidentaloutlaw.knowthenet.org.uk/"&gt;online
test&lt;/a&gt; which you can do to work out your vulnerability - check it out and share your results!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Please visit the site</description><author>windyridgehouse@gmail.com (Jonathan Armstrong)</author><pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:35:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Only 80% of US teens on Social Media </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/11/15/only-80-of-us-teens-on-social-media.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/11/15/only-80-of-us-teens-on-social-media.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/IDEAS/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x1000/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/lexisnexis/teens_5F00_50338843.jpg" border="0" height="277" width="303" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pew&amp;#39;s recent report came as no
surprise that &lt;a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/%7E/media/Files/Reports/2011/PIP_Teens_Kindness_Cruelty_SNS_Report_Nov_2011_FINAL_110711.pdf"&gt;95%
of teens (12-17) are on the Internet&lt;/a&gt;. But why are only 80% using Social
Media? Amazingly&amp;nbsp;55% of online teens &amp;quot;have decided not to post something
online because they were concerned that it might reflect badly on them in the
future.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hopefully the reason
for&amp;nbsp;teenagers&amp;#39; concern about their future&amp;nbsp;is that parents are really
taking the time to educate their children. Pew reported the following
statistics:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;i&gt;94% of parents of online teens say they have talked
     with their teen about what kinds of things should and should</description><author>pvogel@gardere.com (Peter S. Vogel)</author><pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:30:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>TechLaw10: Global HR Systems – Quick Compliance Tips</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/11/11/techlaw10-global-hr-systems-quick-compliance-tips.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/11/11/techlaw10-global-hr-systems-quick-compliance-tips.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/IDEAS/resized-image.ashx/__size/545x1000/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/lexisnexis/techlaw10.jpg" style="max-height:1000px;max-width:550px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TechLaw10 hosts Jonathan Armstrong and Eric Sinrod discuss legal issues
related to information technology.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In this episode, Jonathan and Eric discuss quick
compliance tips for global HR systems. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Please visit the site to view this media)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>windyridgehouse@gmail.com (Jonathan Armstrong)</author><pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 13:44:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Cloud - New Buzzword, Old Legal Issues </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/11/11/cloud-new-buzzword-old-legal-issues.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/11/11/cloud-new-buzzword-old-legal-issues.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/IDEAS/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x1000/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/lexisnexis/cloudcomputing_5F00_83173390.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many readers agreed with my recent
blog that the &lt;a href="http://www.vogelitlawblog.com/2011/10/articles/ecommerce/cloud-computing-ancient-technology-solution-with-a-new-name/"&gt;Cloud
is a new label for old technology&lt;/a&gt; - &amp;quot;think connecting to a mainframe over
telephone lines,&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;and I encourage you&amp;nbsp;to read my &lt;a href="http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/Cloud-Computing---New-Buzzword-Old-Legal-Issues-73714.html"&gt;November
eCommerce Times column about some important Cloud computing legal issues&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More Cloud History&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wikipedia&amp;#39;s historical description
of &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_computing"&gt;Cloud computing &lt;/a&gt;includes:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;The
term &amp;quot;cloud&amp;quot; is used as a metaphor for the Internet, based</description><author>pvogel@gardere.com (Peter S. Vogel)</author><pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:51:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Is There A Social Media Privilege? </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/11/09/is-there-a-social-media-privilege.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/11/09/is-there-a-social-media-privilege.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/TORTSLAW/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images/ILC-social-media-tags.jpg" style="max-height:1000px;max-width:550px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Courts faced with ruling on discovery requests involving social media 
sites are forging new law. Courts can and do issue discovery orders 
compelling a party of a lawsuit to grant an opposing party access to his
 or her Facebook page or to permit in camera review of social media 
sites set to private settings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rules of Civil Procedure in most states provide for liberal 
discovery, e.g., &amp;quot;Generally, discovery is liberally allowed with respect
 to any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to the cause being 
tried.&amp;quot; Pa.R.C.P. 4003.1; FRCP 34 (The Advisory Committee Notes instruct
 that the rule be read broadly and was drafted with the intent to apply 
to an ever evolving technological field); NYCPLR 3101 construed 
liberally.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
</description><author>lisa.mcmanus@lexisnexis.com (Lisa McManus)</author><pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 14:32:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>China and Russia Accused of Internet Spying on US Companies </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/11/07/china-and-russia-accused-of-internet-spying-on-us-companies.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/11/07/china-and-russia-accused-of-internet-spying-on-us-companies.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/IDEAS/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x1000/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/lexisnexis/global_2D00_nce.jpg" border="0" height="220" width="220" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;US intelligence agencies just
reported to Congress that &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/04/world/us-report-accuses-china-and-russia-of-internet-spying.html?_r=1&amp;amp;ref=technology"&gt;China
and Russia have national policies to steal technology from US companies &lt;/a&gt;over
the Internet. The Congressional report was compiled by the &lt;a href="http://www.ncix.gov/index.html"&gt;Office of the National
Counterintelligence Executive &lt;/a&gt;which included this alarming information:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Many
companies are unaware when their sensitive data is pilfered, and those that
find out are often reluctant to report the loss, fearing potential damage to
their reputation with investors, customers and employees. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately pinpointing the
culprits has been difficult</description><author>pvogel@gardere.com (Peter S. Vogel)</author><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 09:58:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Learn Attorney Website Design Versatility at ABA November Conference</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/11/04/learn-attorney-website-design-versatility-at-aba-november-conference.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/11/04/learn-attorney-website-design-versatility-at-aba-november-conference.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/IDEAS/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x1000/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/lexisnexis/abagreenlogo.jpg" height="129" border="0" width="266" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The
upcoming ABA Law Firm Marketing Strategies Conference presents a great
opportunity to learn about the applicability, versatility, and growing
importance of your &lt;a href="http://www.legalwebexperts.com/"&gt;attorney website design&lt;/a&gt; in promoting your legal practice.&amp;nbsp;
The conference focuses on three important components of success in the
legal field. These components, Reputation, Referral, and Ranking, give the
conference name R&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The
conference will be held on November 8&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; and 9&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt;, 2011 at
the Four Seasons Hotel in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and will be presented by
the Law Practice Management Section of the American Bar Association (ABA). By
holding their third event of this kind, ABA continues its tradition</description><author>ryan@legalwebexperts.com (Ryan Nelson)</author><pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 21:53:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>TechLaw10: eDiscovery Limitations on the Horizon in U.S. Courts?</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/11/02/techlaw10-ediscovery-limitations-on-the-horizon-in-u-s-courts.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/11/02/techlaw10-ediscovery-limitations-on-the-horizon-in-u-s-courts.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/IDEAS/resized-image.ashx/__size/545x1000/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/lexisnexis/techlaw10.jpg" style="max-height:1000px;max-width:550px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TechLaw10 hosts Jonathan Armstrong and Eric Sinrod discuss legal issues
related to information technology.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In this episode, Jonathan and Eric discuss recent developments with
electronic discovery (eDiscovery) in the U.S. and Europe.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Please visit the site to view this media)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>windyridgehouse@gmail.com (Jonathan Armstrong)</author><pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 11:50:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Privacy at Risk? - Feds to Monitor Twitter &amp;amp; Facebook </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/11/02/privacy-at-risk-feds-to-monitor-twitter-amp-amp-facebook.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/11/02/privacy-at-risk-feds-to-monitor-twitter-amp-amp-facebook.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/IDEAS/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x1000/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/lexisnexis/facebook_2D00_logo.jpg" height="150" border="0" width="150" alt="" /&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/IDEAS/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x1000/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/lexisnexis/twitter_5F00_logo.jpg" height="146" border="0" width="146" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;US citizens expect the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) to protect the country from potential threats, but the
recent &lt;a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9221374/DHS_to_set_up_policies_for_monitoring_Twitter_Facebook_"&gt;announcement
that DHS will monitor Twitter &amp;amp; Facebook &lt;/a&gt;will surely cause privacy
advocates great concern. Social Media has been used extensively in the
government uprisings world-wide and DHS is now drawing up guidelines to
monitor&amp;nbsp;Social Media. Undersecretary of the DHS Caryn Wagner</description><author>pvogel@gardere.com (Peter S. Vogel)</author><pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:22:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>TechLaw10: YouTube Hack Attack of Sesame Street</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/10/31/techlaw10-youtube-hack-attack-of-sesame-street.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/10/31/techlaw10-youtube-hack-attack-of-sesame-street.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/IDEAS/resized-image.ashx/__size/545x1000/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/lexisnexis/techlaw10.jpg" style="max-height:1000px;max-width:550px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TechLaw10 hosts Jonathan Armstrong and Eric Sinrod discuss legal issues
related to information technology.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In this episode, Jonathan and Eric discuss a recent hacking of the Sesame
Street channel on YouTube and replaced with child-inappropriate content.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Please visit the site to view this media)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>windyridgehouse@gmail.com (Jonathan Armstrong)</author><pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:22:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>GUEST BLOG: New SEC disclosure guidance about cyber security risks </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/10/29/guest-blog-new-sec-disclosure-guidance-about-cyber-security-risks.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/10/29/guest-blog-new-sec-disclosure-guidance-about-cyber-security-risks.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/IDEAS/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x1000/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/lexisnexis/Jim-Breshear_2800_1_2900_.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/IDEAS/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x1000/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/lexisnexis/Zix-Logo.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;GUEST BLOG FROM JIM BRASHEAR&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I welcome Jim Brashear as a Guest
Blogger with his blog concerning cyber security risks.&amp;nbsp;Jim is &lt;a href="http://zixcorp.com/company/management-and-directors/#jbrashear"&gt;Vice
President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary &lt;/a&gt;of Nasdaq-traded &lt;a href="http://zixcorp.com/"&gt;Zix Corporation&lt;/a&gt;, the market leader in email
encryption services.&amp;nbsp;He frequently appears as a public speaker on
corporate governance, data security and information technology legal
topics.&amp;nbsp;You may want to follow him on &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/#</description><author>pvogel@gardere.com (Peter S. Vogel)</author><pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 12:38:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>GPS Data Will be Considered by the US Supreme Court </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/10/26/gps-data-will-be-considered-by-the-us-supreme-court.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/10/26/gps-data-will-be-considered-by-the-us-supreme-court.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/IDEAS/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x1000/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/lexisnexis/gps_5F00_tablet_5F00_64977769.jpg" border="0" height="346" width="381" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Today everybody carries GPS devices
in their phones (and tablets), but few people consider that our personal
privacy may be compromised as a result. In November the US Supreme Court will
hear argument (&lt;a href="https://www.eff.org/files/filenode/US_v_Jones/maynard_decision.pdf"&gt;US v.
Jones&lt;/a&gt;) as to whether the drug suspect&amp;#39;s Constitutional right to privacy was
violated since a &lt;a href="http://www.vogelitlawblog.com/2010/08/articles/ecommerce/gps-tracking-required-warrant/"&gt;GPS
device was attached to his vehicle without a warrant&lt;/a&gt;. As a matter of fact, &lt;a href="https://www.eff.org/press/archives/2011/10/03-0"&gt;Roger L. Easton, the
principle inventor of GPS technology, has joined the Electronic Frontier
Foundation&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;to</description><author>pvogel@gardere.com (Peter S. Vogel)</author><pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:00:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Cloud Computing - Ancient Technology Solution with a New Name </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/10/21/cloud-computing-ancient-technology-solution-with-a-new-name.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/10/21/cloud-computing-ancient-technology-solution-with-a-new-name.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/IDEAS/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x1000/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/lexisnexis/cloudcomputing_5F00_83173390.jpg" border="0" height="299" width="448" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Use of remote computers has been
around since at least 1964, but the current marketing buzz called Cloud
Computing might make you think there&amp;#39;s something new. However Cloud Computing
is merely the newest label for the 1964 remote computing service called&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://dtss.dartmouth.edu/history.php"&gt;&amp;quot;Time-Sharing&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;at
Dartmouth College using a General Electric 235 &lt;/a&gt;computers (and dumb
terminals -Teletype 33/34). Since 1964 the same idea of using remote computing
as &amp;quot;Time-Sharing&amp;quot; has a number of labels including:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;ASP
-Application Service Provider&lt;br /&gt;
SaaS - Software as a Service&lt;br /&gt;
PaaS -Platform as a Service&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A recent legal conference included a
panel discussion about Cloud legal</description><author>pvogel@gardere.com (Peter S. Vogel)</author><pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:26:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>TechLaw10: Internal Investigations in New Cloud Era</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/10/20/techlaw10-internal-investigations-in-new-cloud-era.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/10/20/techlaw10-internal-investigations-in-new-cloud-era.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/IDEAS/resized-image.ashx/__size/545x1000/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/lexisnexis/techlaw10.jpg" style="max-height:1000px;max-width:550px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TechLaw10 hosts Jonathan Armstrong and Eric Sinrod discuss legal issues
related to information technology.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In this episode, Jonathan and Eric discuss the challenges of doing business and conducting internal investigations
when technology, including cloud computing and social networking, are involved.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Please visit the site to view this media)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>LexisNexismyIdeas@lexisnexis.com (Tina George)</author><pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:08:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR: Social Media in the City</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/10/20/international-seminar-social-media-in-the-city.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/10/20/international-seminar-social-media-in-the-city.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/IDEAS/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x1000/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/lexisnexis/sm_5F00_seminar_5F00_53418907.jpg" border="0" height="269" width="403" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;

&lt;table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Starts:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wednesday November 16, 2011,
  09:00AM GMT &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Ends:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wednesday November 16, 2011,
  12:30PM GMT &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Event
  Type:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Training/Seminar&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Location:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One America Square&lt;br /&gt;
  London, GREATER LONDON GB &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Price:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;pound;249 (before VAT)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Website:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;</description><author>LexisNexismyIdeas@lexisnexis.com (Tina George)</author><pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:40:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Are Privacy Policies Being Enforced? </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/10/17/are-privacy-policies-being-enforced.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/10/17/are-privacy-policies-being-enforced.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/IDEAS/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x1000/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/lexisnexis/privacy-policy_5F00_75745675.jpg" border="0" height="205" width="383" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My eCommerce Times column for
October is entitled &amp;quot;&lt;a href="http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/Shore-Up-Your-Privacy-Policy-Before-Disaster-Strikes-73481.html"&gt;Shore
Up Your Privacy Policy Before Disaster Strikes&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; and I encourage you to read
it. Actually it was published the same day as my blog that &lt;a href="http://www.vogelitlawblog.com/2011/10/articles/internet-privacy/more-than-75-million-facebook-users-are-younger-than-13/"&gt;more
than 7.5 million children under 13 are on Facebook&lt;/a&gt;. Since the &lt;a href="http://ftc.gov/"&gt;Federal Trade Commission&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt;regulates Internet
privacy in the US and particularly the &lt;a href="http://1998%20children%e2%80%99s%20online%20privacy%20protection%20act/"&gt;1998
Children&amp;#39;s Online</description><author>pvogel@gardere.com (Peter S. Vogel)</author><pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:52:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>TechLaw10: U.S. Appellate Court Protects Email of Foreigners on Domestic Servers</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/10/14/techlaw10-u-s-appellate-court-protects-email-of-foreigners-on-domestic-servers.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/10/14/techlaw10-u-s-appellate-court-protects-email-of-foreigners-on-domestic-servers.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/IDEAS/resized-image.ashx/__size/545x1000/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/lexisnexis/techlaw10.jpg" style="max-height:1000px;max-width:550px;" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TechLaw10 hosts Jonathan
Armstrong and Eric Sinrod discuss legal issues related to information
technology.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In this episode, Jonathan and
Eric discuss protections enjoyed by the non-U.S. citizens under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Please visit the site to view this media)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>windyridgehouse@gmail.com (Jonathan Armstrong)</author><pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 09:45:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>More than 7.5 Million Facebook Users are Younger than 13 </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/10/12/more-than-7-5-million-facebook-users-are-younger-than-13.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/10/12/more-than-7-5-million-facebook-users-are-younger-than-13.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/IDEAS/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x1000/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/lexisnexis/facebook_5F00_59224768.jpg" height="316" border="0" width="420" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The June 2011 issue of Consumer
Reports included an article that &lt;a href="http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/magazine-archive/2011/june/electronics-computers/state-of-the-net/facebook-concerns/index.htm"&gt;Facebook
has more than 7.5 million children as users &lt;/a&gt;which apparently is violating
the &lt;a href="http://www.ftc.gov/ogc/coppa1.htm"&gt;1998 Children&amp;#39;s Online Privacy
Protection Act &lt;/a&gt;(COPPA)&amp;nbsp;which precludes children under 13 from using
websites and in particular to join Facebook. The Consumer Reports article
stated that:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;i&gt;Of the 20 million minors who actively used Facebook in
     the past year, 7.5 million-or more than one-third-were younger than 13 and
     not supposed to be able to use the site. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;i&gt;Among</description><author>pvogel@gardere.com (Peter S. Vogel)</author><pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:53:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>LAUNCHED! Nexis&amp;#174; News Search App</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/10/10/launched-nexis-amp-174-news-search-app.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/LitigationResourceCenter/blogs/legaltechnology/archive/2011/10/10/launched-nexis-amp-174-news-search-app.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/IDEAS/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x1000/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/lexisnexis/LN_5F00_Horz_5F00_big.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On a plane, on a train, in a car (&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;NOT &lt;/span&gt;while behind the wheel,
please) ... from literally almost &lt;i&gt;anywhere; &lt;/i&gt;you
can now access nexis.com via your iPhone or iPad.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#39;s the idea that got the ball rollin&amp;#39; &lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/ideas/blogs/ideas/archive/2010/08/13/nexis.com-as-an-iphone-and-ipad-app.aspx"&gt;Nexis.com
as an iPhone and iPad App&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; See...you do make a difference.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hey, keep the ideas coming! &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Don&amp;#39;t&amp;#39; forget to read what others are
submitting, submit your own innovative idea or cast your vote for your favorite
idea on LexisNexis myIDEAS! &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks, &lt;br /&gt;LexisNexis myIDEAS Team&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>LexisNexismyIdeas@lexisnexis.com (Tina George)</author><pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:06:00 -0400</pubDate></item></channel></rss>