LexisNexis Patent Law Community | LexisNexis
Featured Content
  • Top 10 Cases
  • Top 10 Patent Cases for the Month of May 2011

06/01/2011 04:47:00 PM EST

Top 10 Patent Cases for the Month of May 2011

1. Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S.A., No. 10-6, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 4022, February 23, 2011, Argued, May 31, 2011, Decided,  The LEXIS pagination of this document is subject to change pending release of the final published version. [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers / unenhanced version available from lexisONE Free Case Law]

OVERVIEW:  Induced infringement under 35 U.S.C.S. § 271(b) required knowledge that the induced acts constituted patent infringement, and because a competitor's designers copied all but the cosmetic features of a patent holder's product based on an overseas model, knowing it was for U.S. sales but had no patent markings, a verdict of liability was affirmed.

CORE TERMS:  patent, infringement, willful, blindness, fryer, induced, contributory, deep fryer, patented, induce ...

 

2. Voice of the Arab World, Inc. v. MDTV Med. News Now, Inc., No. 10-1396, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 10882, May 27, 2011, Decided [enhanced version / unenhanced version]

CORE TERMS:  mdtv, irreparable harm, injunctive relief, preliminary injunction, trademark infringement, registration, website, injunction, patent, likelihood of success ...

 

3. Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co., 2008-1511, 2008-1512, 2008-1513, 2008-1514, 2008-1595, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 10590, May 25, 2011, Decided [enhanced version / unenhanced version]

OVERVIEW:  Court of appeals tightened standards for finding inequitable conduct in patent infringement actions, and adopted a standard that requires an accused infringer to prove by clear and convincing evidence that a patentee acted with specific intent to deceive the PTO, and that the deception had a material effect on the PTO's decision to award a patent.

CORE TERMS:  patent, inequitable conduct, materiality, patentee, membrane, disclosure, misconduct, examiner, blood, prior art ...

 

4. Tessera, Inc. v. ITC, 2010-1176, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 10363, May 23, 2011, Decided [enhanced version / unenhanced version]

CORE TERMS:  patent, layer, top layer, terminals, licensee, solder, mask, license, exhaustion, barrier ...

 

5. In re Brimonidine Patent Litig.; Allergan, Inc. v. Exela Pharmsci Inc., 2010-1102, 2010-1103, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 10151, May 19, 2011, Decided [enhanced version / unenhanced version]

OVERVIEW:  Where defendants' abbreviated new drug applications were found to have infringed plaintiff's patents for eye drop formulations for treatment of glaucoma, under 35 U.S.C.S. § 271(e)(2), the court of appeals affirmed as to the validity of the patents, but reversed one finding of infringement by an abbreviated new drug application.

CORE TERMS:  brimonidine, patent, concentration, tears, preservative, solubility, chlorine dioxide, infringement, oxidation, disclose ...

 

6. Arris Group, Inc. v. British Telcoms. PLC, 2010-1292, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 10150, May 19, 2011, Decided [enhanced version / unenhanced version]

OVERVIEW:  Judgment dismissing a supplier's declaratory judgment suit was reversed because even in the absence of an express accusation against the supplier, there was a dispute between the supplier and the patentee concerning the supplier's liability for contributory infringement that was sufficient to constitute a U.S. Const. art. III case or controversy.

CORE TERMS:  infringement, cable, network, supplier's, patent, customer, declaratory judgment, contributory, patents-in-suit, presentation ...

 

7. Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc., 2009-1299, 2009-1347, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 9728, May 13, 2011, Decided [enhanced version / unenhanced version]

OVERVIEW:  Court of appeals vacated a judgment awarding a patentee $349,035,842 after a jury found that semiconductor manufacturers infringed patents which pertained to dynamic random access memory technology. The district court applied the wrong standard when it found that the patentee was not precluded from recovering damages because it destroyed evidence.

CORE TERMS:  patent, bus, reasonably foreseeable, contingency, spoliation, written description, manufacturer, obviousness, new trial, disclosure ...

 

8. Micron Tech., Inc. v. Rambus Inc., 2009-1263, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 9730, May 13, 2011, Decided,  As corrected May 16, 2011. [enhanced version / unenhanced version]

OVERVIEW:  Court affirmed determination that patentee spoliated documents, but vacated dismissal sanction. In determining that a spoliator acted in bad faith, a district court had to do more than state the conclusion of spoliation and note that the document destruction was intentional. Basis of bad faith determination was not clear, requiring remand.

CORE TERMS:  patent, bad faith, spoliation, destruction, manufacturer, reasonably foreseeable, destroyed, retention, licensing, memory ...

 

9. In re Huai-Hung Kao, 2010-1307, 2010-1308, 2010-1309, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 9729, May 13, 2011, Decided [enhanced version / unenhanced version]

OVERVIEW:  Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences' decision rejecting U.S. Patent App. No. 11/680,432, which pertained to controlled-release tablets containing moxymorphone, was vacated because Board based its finding of obviousness on factual findings that lacked substantial evidence and Board improperly refused to credit evidence of commercial success.

CORE TERMS:  oxymorphone, obviousness, dissolution, prior art, secondary, invention, opioid, correlation, unexpected, examiner ...

 

10. In re Mostafazadeh, 2010-1260, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 9042, May 3, 2011, Decided [enhanced version / unenhanced version]

OVERVIEW:  Because the application for patent reissue pursuant to 35 U.S.C.S. § 251 impermissibly attempted to recapture subject matter surrendered during prosecution of the original patent application, it was not improper for the Board of Patent Appeals to reject the patent holders' reissue application.

CORE TERMS:  reissue, surrendered, recapture, subject matter, die, narrowing, patent, pad, frame, bus bars ...

For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site.


Add a Comment

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  
Enter the Image Code: