LexisNexis Patent Law Community | LexisNexis
Featured Content
  • Top 10 Cases
  • Top 10 Patent Cases for the Month of October 2012

11/05/2012 09:55:16 AM EST

Top 10 Patent Cases for the Month of October 2012

1. In re Baxter Int'l, Inc., 2011-1073, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 22287, October 26, 2012, Decided [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

CORE TERMS:  patent, reexamination, en banc, res judicata, final judgment, finality, holder, redetermination, final decision, well-established ...

 

2. Flo Healthcare Solutions, LLC v. Kappos, 2011-1476, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 22081, October 23, 2012, Decided [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

OVERVIEW:  Patent described a mobile computer work-station intended for medical care environments. Term "height adjustment mechanism," reasonably imparted sufficient structure so that the presumption against applying 35 U.S.C.S. § 112, para. 6 in this context was not overcome. Court nevertheless agreed claims did not require length-adjustable vertical beam.

CORE TERMS:  patent, height, adjustment mechanism, examiner, broadest, reasonable interpretation, reexamination, vertical, beam, prior art ...

 

3. Energy Transp. Group, Inc. v. William Demant Holding A/S, 2011-1487, 2011-1488, 2011-1489, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 21200, October 12, 2012, Decided [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

OVERVIEW:  Trial court had not erred when it admitted an expert report as to damages as not unduly prejudicial under Fed. R. Evid. 403, and the jury's finding that defendants had infringed, because a prior art patent under 35 U.S.C.S. § 102(e) did not anticipate or disclose an important claimed feature.

CORE TERMS:  feedback, filter, acoustic, signal, patent, hearing aid, coefficient, programmable, amplitude, phase ...

 

4. Apple Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co., 2012-1507, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 21085, October 11, 2012, Decided [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

OVERVIEW:  A court reversed an order enjoining an alleged infringer from selling its smartphone because a patentee presented no evidence that directly tied consumer demand for the product to the allegedly infringing feature. The causal link between the alleged infringement and consumer demand was too tenuous to support a finding of irreparable harm.

CORE TERMS:  module, heuristic, nexus, algorithm, causal, irreparable harm, plurality, unified, infringement, consumer demand ...

 

5. SanDisk Corp. v. Kingston Tech. Co., 2011-1346, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 20938, October 9, 2012, Decided [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

OVERVIEW:  Where a final judgment as to the infringement or validity of claims had not been entered, the court's claim constructions impacting those withdrawn claims were not reviewable on appeal. The district court erred in part in determining that an equivalent had been dedicated to the public under 35 U.S.C.S. § 102(b).

CORE TERMS:  block, logical, memory, recording, controller, user, programming, overhead, specification, updated ...

 

6. Belkin Int'l, Inc. v. Kappos, 2012-1090, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 20545, October 2, 2012, Decided [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

OVERVIEW:  Appellant should have petitioned PTO Director to review determination that the arguments relying on three prior art references did not raise a substantial new question of patentability pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.927. It did not do so, and thus that decision became final and non-appealable, rendering those issues beyond scope of reexamination.

CORE TERMS:  patentability, reexamination, prior art, requester, examiner, inter partes, patent, non-appealable, favorable, final decision ...

 

7. Fujitsu Ltd. v. Tellabs, Inc., No. 09 C 4530, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153911, October 26, 2012, Decided, October 26, 2012, Filed [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

CORE TERMS:  optical, signal, receiver, amplifier, wavelength, photodetector, controller, fiber, coupler, disclose ...

 

8. Two Moms and a Toy, LLC v. Int'l Playthings, LLC, Civil Action No. 10-cv-02271-PAB-BNB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152840, October 24, 2012, Decided, October 24, 2012, Filed [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

CORE TERMS:  toy, pump, faceplate, spout, assembly, patent, prior art, invention, outlet, skill ...

 

9. Brandywine Communs. Techs., LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., Case No: 6:12-cv-272-Orl-36DAB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, ORLANDO DIVISION, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152644, October 24, 2012, Decided, October 24, 2012, Filed [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

CORE TERMS:  infringement, patent, induced, willful, contributory, infringe, indirect, patent-in-suit, infringer, pre-suit ...

 

10. Havco Wood Prods. v. Indus. Hardwood Prods., 10-cv-566-wmc, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151447, May 23, 2012, Decided, October 22, 2012, Filed [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]

OVERVIEW:  In this patent infringement action, defendant's motion for summary judgment was granted as to the asserted claims of the '766 patent; because defendant's Pound Saver product contained adhesive-lacking strips running the length of the board, no reasonable jury could find such a bond to be "continuous."

CORE TERMS:  surface, patent, flooring, floor, trailer, hardwood, discontinuous, adhesive, infringement, continuously ...

....

Sign in with your Lexis.com ID to access Patent Law resources on Lexis.com or any of these Mathew Bender Patent Law publications. 

Click here to order Patent Law treatises/resources and Mathew Bender publications. 

LexisNexis Publications:

View the LexisNexis Catalog of Legal and Professional Publications

LexisNexis eBooks

Click here for a list of available LexisNexis eBooks.

Click here to learn more about LexisNexis eBooks.

For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site.


Add a Comment

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  
Enter the Image Code: