LexisNexis Patent Law Community | LexisNexis
Featured Content
  • TOP CASES
  • Top 10 most recent Patent Cases on Lexis.com for the week of November 1st, 2009

11/11/2009 02:42:56 PM EST

Top 10 most recent Patent Cases on Lexis.com for the week of November 1st, 2009

1. In re Whittaker, 2009-1343, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 24377, November 5, 2009, Decided, DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of In re Whittaker
 
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of In re Whittaker
 
2. In re Rackman, 2009-1217, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 24369, November 4, 2009, Decided, THIS DECISION WAS ISSUED AS UNPUBLISHED OR NONPRECEDENTIAL AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENT. PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1 GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS.
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of In re Rackman
 
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of In re Rackman
 
3. Imation Corp. v. Koninklijke Philips Elecs. N.V., 2009-1208, 2009-1209, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 24231, November 3, 2009, Decided
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Imation Corp. v. Koninklijke Philips Elecs. N.V.
 
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Imation Corp. v. Koninklijke Philips Elecs. N.V.
 
4. Graceway Pharms., LLC v. River's Edge Pharms., LLC, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08-CV-0067-RWS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA, GAINESVILLE DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103589, November 6, 2009, Decided, November 6, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Graceway Pharms., LLC v. River's Edge Pharms., LLC
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
5. Newfrey LLC v. Burnex Corp., Case No. 07-13029, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN, SOUTHERN DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102932, November 5, 2009, Decided, November 5, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Newfrey LLC v. Burnex Corp.
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
6. Ed Tobergate Assocs. Co. v. Russell Brands, LLC, Case No. 08-2290-JWL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103146, November 5, 2009, Decided, November 5, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Ed Tobergate Assocs. Co. v. Russell Brands, LLC
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
7. Abbott Labs. v. Matrix Labs., Inc., Case No.: 09-cv-1586, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103055, November 5, 2009, Decided, November 5, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Abbott Labs. v. Matrix Labs., Inc.
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
8. Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc., Civil Action No. 05-CV-1887 (DMC), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103104, November 5, 2009, Decided, November 5, 2009, Filed, NOT FOR PUBLICATION
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
9. Medtech Prods. v. Ranir, LLC, Case No. 07-CV-3302 (KMK), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103211, November 5, 2009, Decided, November 5, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Medtech Prods. v. Ranir, LLC
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
10. QSI Indus., Inc. v. ESU, LLC, CV-06-691-ST, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103411, November 5, 2009, Decided, November 5, 2009, Filed
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of QSI Indus., Inc. v. ESU, LLC
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

Add a Comment

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  
Enter the Image Code: