Patent Law Community | LexisNexis
Featured Content
  • TOP CASES
  • Top 10 most recent Patent Cases on Lexis.com for the week of November 22nd, 2009

12/02/2009 03:03:43 PM EST

Top 10 most recent Patent Cases on Lexis.com for the week of November 22nd, 2009

1. Mensing v. Wyeth, Inc., No. 08-3850, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 25911, October 20, 2009, Submitted, November 27, 2009, Filed
 
CORE TERMS: manufacturer's, generic, label, fda, brand, metoclopramide, warning, labeling, preemption, generic drugs ...
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Mensing v. Wyeth, Inc.
 
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Mensing v. Wyeth, Inc.
 
2. United States v. Mohsen, No. 07-10059, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 25849, August 31, 2009, Argued and Submitted, San Francisco, California, November 25, 2009, Filed
 
CORE TERMS: prosecutor, indictment, perjury, contempt, passport, patent law, plain error, verdict form, ineffective assistance of counsel, incorrect ...
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of United States v. Mohsen
 
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of United States v. Mohsen
 
3. DirecTV Latin Am., LLC v. Park 610, LLC, 08 Civ. 3987 (VM) (GWG), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110295, November 27, 2009, Decided
 
CORE TERMS: joint venture, attachment, personal jurisdiction, fiduciary duties, citation omitted, quotation marks omitted, ownership, fraudulent, fiduciary, omission ...
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of DirecTV Latin Am., LLC v. Park 610, LLC
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
4. Sharafabadi v. Univ. of Idaho, CASE NO. C09-1043JLR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110904, November 27, 2009, Decided, November 27, 2009, Filed
 
CORE TERMS: infringement, seed, patent infringement, indirect, patent, mustard seed, yellow, factual allegations, patented, contributory ...
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Sharafabadi v. Univ. of Idaho
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
5. CIES BISKER, LLC v. 3M Co., CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08-CV-115 (DF), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, MARSHALL DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110055, November 25, 2009, Decided, November 25, 2009, Filed
 
CORE TERMS: photographic, print, printing, coating, ink, protective, patentee, floor tile, invention, graphic ...
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of CIES BISKER, LLC v. 3M Co.
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
6. Align Tech., Inc. v. Fed. Ins. Co., No. C-08-04705 RMW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110278, November 25, 2009, Decided, November 25, 2009, Filed
 
CORE TERMS: coverage, summary judgment, causes of action, cross-complaint, insured's, duty to defend, intellectual property, infringement, lawsuit, insurer's ...
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Align Tech., Inc. v. Fed. Ins. Co.
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
7. Furminator, Inc. v. Munchkin, Inc., Case No. 4:08CV00367 ERW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI, EASTERN DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110400, November 25, 2009, Decided, November 25, 2009, Filed
 
CORE TERMS: patent, abeyance, voluntary dismissal, legal opinions, opinion letter, withdraw, drafted, misconduct, non-party, defending ...
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Furminator, Inc. v. Munchkin, Inc.
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
8. Lincoln Nat'l Life v. Transamerica Fin. Life Ins. Co., CAUSE NO. 1:08-CV-135, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA, FORT WAYNE DIVISION, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110599, November 25, 2009, Decided, November 25, 2009, Filed
 
CORE TERMS: inequitable conduct, amend, withheld, material information, patent, chart, discovery requests, expert report, counterclaim, heightened ...
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Lincoln Nat'l Life v. Transamerica Fin. Life Ins. Co.
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
9. Bushnell, Inc. v. Brunton Co., CIVIL ACTION No. 09-cv-2009 KHV/JPO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110612, November 25, 2009, Decided
 
CORE TERMS: pulse, laser, patent, rangefinder, noise, preliminary injunction, signal, target, irreparable harm, display ...
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Bushnell, Inc. v. Brunton Co.
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.
 
10. Tex. Instruments, Inc. v. BIAX Corp., Civil Action No. 07-cv-02370-WDM-MEH,Civil Action No. 07-cv-02548-WDM-BNB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110619, November 25, 2009, Decided, November 25, 2009, Filed
 
CORE TERMS: arbitration award, arbitration, license, refund, summary judgment, confirmation, finality, patent, void, favorable ...
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Tex. Instruments, Inc. v. BIAX Corp
 
Non-subscribers can access Federal Case Law, Codes, Shepard's® Citations, Administrative, Legislative, and Secondary Sources using lexisOne’s Research Value Package.

Add a Comment

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  
Enter the Image Code: