﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../StyleSheet/rss.xsl"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Real Estate Law Community Green Buildings</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/realestatelaw</link><description>LexisNexis Real Estate Law Community</description><copyright>http://www.lexisnexis.com/terms/copyright.aspx</copyright><atom:link href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/realestatelaw/Rss.aspx?id=423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Tall and Sustainable Is Not an Easy Fix</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2012/11/07/tall-and-sustainable-is-not-an-easy-fix.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2012/11/07/tall-and-sustainable-is-not-an-easy-fix.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" title="Green Building" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/greenbuildings/green-buildings.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="border:0;float:left;margin:11px;" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/greenbuildings/green-buildings.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Way back in 2009, I discussed the interaction between&amp;nbsp;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://constructionlawva.com/urban-retrofits-tall-buildings-and-sustainability/"&gt;taller and taller buildings and sustainable (&amp;quot;green&amp;quot;) building&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Back then, the reference was to the construction of skyscrapers in the Middle East and Europe.&amp;nbsp; The&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://enr.ecnext.com/comsite5/bin/comsite5.pl?page=enr_document&amp;amp;first_dir=buildings&amp;amp;item_id=0271-56286&amp;amp;pub_code=ENR&amp;amp;modperl=1&amp;amp;second_dir=design&amp;amp;article</description><author>chrisghill@constructionlawva.com (Christopher G. Hill)</author><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:18:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Capital Review Group: Energy Efficiency and Claiming the §179D Deduction as Far Back as 1/1/2006</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2012/10/01/capital-review-group-energy-efficiency-and-claiming-the-167-179d-deduction-as-far-back-as-1-1-2006.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2012/10/01/capital-review-group-energy-efficiency-and-claiming-the-167-179d-deduction-as-far-back-as-1-1-2006.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.capitalreviewgroup.com/" title="Capital Review Group" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img border="0" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/greenbuildings/9_2D00_11_2D00_2012-9_2D00_43_2D00_04-AM.png" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Introduction&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct) includes the &amp;sect;179D tax deduction for investments in &amp;quot;energy-efficient commercial building property&amp;quot; designed to significantly reduce the heating, cooling, water heating, and interior lighting energy cost of new or existing commercial buildings. This energy-efficient commercial building property must be placed into service between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2013. The &amp;sect;179D tax deduction was designed by Congress to incentivize the utilization of energy-efficiency components in a building to one of the following parties:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The owner of the building&lt;/li</description><author>CapitalReviewGroup@placeholder.com (Capital Review Group)</author><pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 12:31:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Capital Review Group: Are You Ready to Take Advantage of the New Green Tax Incentives?</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2012/09/17/capital-review-group-are-you-ready-to-take-advantage-of-the-new-green-tax-incentives.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2012/09/17/capital-review-group-are-you-ready-to-take-advantage-of-the-new-green-tax-incentives.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.capitalreviewgroup.com/" title="Capital Review Group" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img border="0" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/greenbuildings/9_2D00_11_2D00_2012-9_2D00_43_2D00_04-AM.png" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;INTRODUCTION&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Energy Policy Act of 2005 includes a tax deduction for investments in &amp;quot;energy-efficient commercial building property&amp;quot; designed to significantly reduce the heating, cooling, water heating, and interior lighting energy cost of new or existing commercial buildings. This energy-efficient commercial building property must be placed into service between January 1, 2006 and &lt;strong&gt;December 31, 2013.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you are a building owner or a tenant/lessee who has paid for energy efficient construction or improvement projects, you may be eligible for a tax deduction of up to $1.80 per square foot for improving the energy</description><author>CapitalReviewGroup@placeholder.com (Capital Review Group)</author><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:15:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Capital Review Group: Grasping the Tax Opportunities for Apartment Building Owners</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2012/09/11/capital-review-group-grasping-the-tax-opportunities-for-apartment-building-owners.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2012/09/11/capital-review-group-grasping-the-tax-opportunities-for-apartment-building-owners.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.capitalreviewgroup.com/" title="Capital Review Group" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img border="0" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/greenbuildings/9_2D00_11_2D00_2012-9_2D00_43_2D00_04-AM.png" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks to &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://bit.ly/RPNlMF"&gt;&amp;sect;179 of the Energy Policy Act (EPAct)&lt;/a&gt;, new and
existing apartment buildings not only can recognize significant reductions in
energy costs, but may also qualify for substantial tax deductions for energy-efficient construction and
renovations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" title="Green Tax Savings" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/realestatelaw/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/greenbuildings/Green-Tax-Savings.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="border:0;float:left;margin:12px;" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/realestatelaw/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer</description><author>CapitalReviewGroup@placeholder.com (Capital Review Group)</author><pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:41:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Be Careful with “Green” Construction</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2012/05/15/be-careful-with-green-construction.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2012/05/15/be-careful-with-green-construction.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;As readers of Construction Law Musings can attest, I am an enthusiastic (if at times skeptical) supporter of&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://constructionlawva.com/sustainable-construction/" target="_blank"&gt;sustainable (or &amp;quot;green&amp;quot;) building&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; I am solidly behind the environmental and other benefits of this type of construction.&amp;nbsp; However, I have likened myself to that loveable donkey&amp;nbsp;&lt;a title="Eeyore" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eeyore" rel="wikipedia" target="_blank"&gt;Eeyore&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://aribra.com/risks-for-a-sustainable-future-or-how-eeyore-would-see-green-construction" target="_blank"&gt;on more than one occasion&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;when discussing the headlong charge to a sustainable future.&amp;nbsp; While I see the great benefits of a privately built and privately driven marketplace for sustainable (I prefer this term to &amp;quot;green&amp;quot; because&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://constructionlawva.com/green-expectations-or-just-expectations/" target="_blank"&gt;I find it less</description><author>chrisghill@constructionlawva.com (Christopher G. Hill)</author><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 23:00:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>“Green” Expectations. . . or Just Expectations (“green” is not a specification; it’s a paint color)</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2012/03/01/green-expectations-or-just-expectations-green-is-not-a-specification-it-s-a-paint-color.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2012/03/01/green-expectations-or-just-expectations-green-is-not-a-specification-it-s-a-paint-color.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I was having a discussion regarding &amp;quot;green&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; building with my friend and&amp;nbsp;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://constructionlawva.com/balanced-recipe/"&gt;recent guest poster here at Musings&lt;/a&gt;, Nick Pacella (@&lt;a title="View nmpacella&amp;#39;s Twitter Profile" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/nmpacella"&gt;nmpacella&lt;/a&gt;) this past week and (as often happens when I chat with the great folks in the construction world) it got me to thinking.&amp;nbsp; Is &amp;quot;Green&amp;quot; its own separate category of construction, or just another sub-set of possible specifications for a construction project with it&amp;#39;s own set of challenges?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Much has been made of&amp;nbsp;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://constructionlawva.com/sustainable-construction/"&gt;sustainable construction&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;from a&amp;nbsp;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://constructionlawva.com/true-sustainability-trust-but-verify/"&gt;risk management&lt;/a&gt;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://constructionlawva.com/why-build</description><author>chrisghill@constructionlawva.com (Christopher G. Hill)</author><pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 09:54:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Vandeventer Black LLP: New Congressional LEED Spending Restrictions for DOD</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2012/02/01/New-Congressional-LEED-Spending-Restrictions-for-DOD.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2012/02/01/New-Congressional-LEED-Spending-Restrictions-for-DOD.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;&lt;a title="Vandeventer Black LLP Logo" target="_blank" href="http://www.vanblk.com/"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/ESTATE-ELDERLAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/elderlawblog/2011Logo.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;&lt;i&gt;By &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.vanblk.com/bio/62/" rel="author"&gt;Neil Lowenstein
  &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Below is a summary 
of the new Congressional LEED spending restrictions for DOD prepared by 
one our firm attorneys, George Nicholos.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Sudden Policy Re-direction / Congress Restricts LEED Spending at Department of Defense&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;The Department
 of Defense (DoD) has been at the forefront of implementing goals in 
areas of energy efficiency, renewable energy, recycling, water 
conservation, and use of sustainable building strategies which were set 
by Executive</description><author>VandeventerBlack@placeholder.com (Vandeventer Black LLP)</author><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:41:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>McDermott Will &amp; Emery: Treasury Clarifies 5 Percent Safe Harbor Ownership Guidelines for Section 1603 Grants for Renewable Energy Projects </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/12/15/mcdermott-will-amp-emery-treasury-clarifies-5-percent-safe-harbor-ownership-guidelines-for-section-1603-grants-for-renewable-energy-projects.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/12/15/mcdermott-will-amp-emery-treasury-clarifies-5-percent-safe-harbor-ownership-guidelines-for-section-1603-grants-for-renewable-energy-projects.aspx</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:55:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Sheppard Mullin Richter &amp; Hampton LLP: CEQA Amendments from the 2011 Legislative Session</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/12/14/sheppard-mullin-richter-amp-hampton-llp-ceqa-amendments-from-the-2011-legislative-session.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/12/14/sheppard-mullin-richter-amp-hampton-llp-ceqa-amendments-from-the-2011-legislative-session.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" title="Sheppard Mullin Logo" href="http://www.sheppardmullin.com/"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/realestatelaw/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/greenbuildings/12_2D00_14_2D00_2011-3_2D00_15_2D00_03-PM.png" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;By &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.sheppardmullin.com/jdavidoff"&gt;Judy Davidoff&lt;/a&gt; and Alex Merritt&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;In the 2011 session, the California Legislature and the Governor 
passed several bills to amend CEQA. As summarized below, these bills 
streamline the review process for green projects, environmental 
leadership projects, and a proposed football stadium; relax water supply
 assessment requirements for photovoltaic and wind energy projects; and 
clarify requirements for naming and serving real parties in interest in 
CEQA lawsuits.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;1. SB 226 (Simitian)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SB 226 amends CEQA</description><author>SheppardMullinRichterHampton2@placeholder.com (Sheppard, Mullin, Richter &amp; Hampton LLP)</author><pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:12:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Foley &amp; Lardner LLP: Commercial PACE Funding Models Race to Finish Line</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/11/28/foley-amp-lardner-llp-commercial-pace-funding-models-race-to-finish-line.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/11/28/foley-amp-lardner-llp-commercial-pace-funding-models-race-to-finish-line.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" title="Foley &amp;amp; Lardner Logo" href="http://www.foley.com/home.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/realestatelaw/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/greenbuildings/11_2D00_28_2D00_2011-2_2D00_31_2D00_25-PM.png" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;By &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.foley.com/people/bio.aspx?employeeid=16486"&gt;Emerson M. Lotzia&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) 
legislation has been enacted in 27 states and the District of Columbia 
and will offer significant opportunities for owners of commercial 
facilities (e.g., office, retail, and industrial) (Owners), PACE lenders
 and bondholders (Program Lenders), Energy Service Companies (ESCOs), 
existing property lenders (Banks), and third-party administrators (TPAs)
 to benefit from a tax lien financing program that provides a business 
owner the ability to install energy retrofit equipment and components 
that</description><author>FoleyandLardner@placeholder.com (Foley &amp; Lardner LLP)</author><pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:29:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Upcoming Municipal Green Construction Code</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/11/03/upcoming-municipal-green-construction-code.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/11/03/upcoming-municipal-green-construction-code.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/ENVIRONMENTAL-CLIMATECHANGELAW/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Author+Thumbnails/Marc-Karell.jpg" alt="Marc Karell" style="max-width:550px;border:0;" border="0" /&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;By Marc Karell, P.E.,
CEM, Principal, Climate Change &amp;amp; Environmental Services, LLC&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;The International
Code Council (ICC) is in the process of rolling out final standards for Green
Construction, called International Green Construction Codes (IgCC), in March
2012 (&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.iccsafe.org/cs/IGCC"&gt;www.iccsafe.org/cs/IGCC&lt;/a&gt;). The IgCC is intended to be an enforceable code for
municipalities to seamlessly adopt</description><author>karell@ccesworld.com (Marc Karell)</author><pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 13:34:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Whence Green Building?</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/09/27/whence-green-building.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/09/27/whence-green-building.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It has been a while since I last &amp;quot;mused&amp;quot; on &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://constructionlawva.com/sustainable-construction/"&gt;sustainable (or &amp;quot;green&amp;quot;) building&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Since my &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://constructionlawva.com/construction-green-building-roundup/"&gt;last post on the subject&lt;/a&gt;
 much has been in the news, and most of it negative in some way.&amp;nbsp; While 
much good has occurred to advance the sustainable building cause, recent
 news on this front has shed an unnecessarily negative light on the 
concept.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the mixed blessing front, the false advertising lawsuit by Mr. Gifford against the &lt;a title="USGBC" href="http://www.usgbc.org/" rel="homepage" target="_blank"&gt;USGBC&lt;/a&gt; has &lt;a href="http://www.greenbuildinglawupdate.com/2011/08/articles/legal-developments/breaking-lawsuit-against-usgbc-dismissed/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+GreenBuildingLawUpdate+%28Green+Building+Law+Update%29" target="_blank</description><author>chrisghill@constructionlawva.com (Christopher G. Hill)</author><pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 07:42:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Green Patent Blog: Building Immunity: Are Green Skills Certifiers Untouchable After LEED Win?</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/09/26/green-patent-blog-building-immunity-are-green-skills-certifiers-untouchable-after-leed-win.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/09/26/green-patent-blog-building-immunity-are-green-skills-certifiers-untouchable-after-leed-win.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last year several individuals, including a green building consultant, an architect, and an&amp;nbsp;engineer, sued the &lt;a target="_blank" title="usgbc" href="http://www.usgbc.org/"&gt;&lt;b&gt;U.S. Green Building Council&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
 (USGBC) in federal court in New York, alleging that the organization 
made false or misleading statements in&amp;nbsp;connection with&amp;nbsp;its &lt;a title="LEED" href="http://www.usgbc.org/DisplayPage.aspx?CategoryID=19" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (LEED) certification system for green buildings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Specifically, Henry Gifford&amp;nbsp;and the other plaintiffs&amp;nbsp;accused the 
USGBC of making false statements regarding the energy and money-saving 
aspects of LEED certification in a 2008 press release, which says the 
results of a 2008 study:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left:30px;"&gt;&lt;i&gt;indicate that new buildings certified under the [USGBC&amp;#39;s]
 LEED certification system are, on average, performing 25-30% better 
than</description><author>elane@luce.com (Eric L. Lane)</author><pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:29:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Ulmer &amp; Berne: Financing Renewable Energy: Protect the Planet, Boost your ROI</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/08/31/ulmer-amp-berne-financing-renewable-energy-protect-the-planet-boost-your-roi.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/08/31/ulmer-amp-berne-financing-renewable-energy-protect-the-planet-boost-your-roi.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/realestatelawblog/Ulmer_2500_20Berne_2500_20Logo.gif"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.ulmer.com/Pages/default.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/realestatelawblog/Ulmer_2500_20Berne_2500_20Logo-2.gif" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;By &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.ulmer.com/attorneys/Stein_Gregory/Pages/default.aspx"&gt;Greg Stein&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Protecting this planet&amp;#39;s natural resources for future generations is a
 moral obligation; unfortunately, moral obligations do not pay the 
bills.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Coal is a nonrenewable resource that causes pollution.&amp;nbsp;But it&amp;#39;s 
cheap.&amp;nbsp;Renewable energy is often a more expensive alternative to using 
coal, oil, or natural gas to produce energy.&amp;nbsp;Recognizing that renewable </description><author>GregoryStein@placeholder.com (Gregory P. Stein)</author><pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:05:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Foley &amp; Lardner LLP: Letters of Intent for Green Leases for Office and Retail</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/08/25/foley-amp-lardner-llp-letters-of-intent-for-green-leases-for-office-and-retail.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/08/25/foley-amp-lardner-llp-letters-of-intent-for-green-leases-for-office-and-retail.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" title="Foley and Lardner Logo" href="http://www.foley.com/home.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/realestatelaw/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/greenbuildings/Foley.png" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;By &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.foley.com/people/bio.aspx?employeeid=16486" id="link"&gt;Emerson M. Lotzia&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When a landlord or tenant desires a green or 
sustainable lease pursuant to (i) internal policies or corporate 
branding or (ii) requires such a lease because of financing or monetary 
incentives, addressing the key green or sustainable lease issues in the 
letter of intent or lease proposal (collectively, the LOI) can save much
 time and expense in finalizing the lease. This article will discuss the
 key elements of a green or sustainable lease that should be addressed 
in any LOI.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;1.&amp;nbsp; Sustainability Standards.&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As referenced above</description><author>FoleyandLardner@placeholder.com (Foley &amp; Lardner LLP)</author><pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 18:22:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Ulmer &amp; Berne LLP: Green Leasing Unveiled - Part II</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/07/26/ulmer-amp-berne-llp-green-leasing-unveiled-part-ii.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/07/26/ulmer-amp-berne-llp-green-leasing-unveiled-part-ii.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/realestatelawblog/Ulmer_2500_20Berne_2500_20Logo.gif"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.ulmer.com/Pages/default.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/realestatelawblog/Ulmer_2500_20Berne_2500_20Logo-2.gif" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;By &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.ulmer.com/attorneys/Weber_Chaz/Pages/default.aspx"&gt;John Weber&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.realestateadvisorlawblog.com/2011/05/articles/green-leasing-unveiled-part-1/"&gt;Part I&lt;/a&gt; of our series on the particulars of Green Leasing, we 
discussed Lease Term and Operating Expenses.&amp;nbsp;Now we turn to a robust 
area for implementing sustainable processes between Landlords and 
Tenants:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration:underline;"&gt;Interior Alterations</description><author>JohnCWeber@placeholder.com (John C. Weber)</author><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:30:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Construction and Green Building Roundup</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/06/14/construction-and-green-building-roundup.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/06/14/construction-and-green-building-roundup.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Over the past week or so, several great pieces have been written across the web relating to &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://constructionlawva.com/sustainable-construction/"&gt;green building&lt;/a&gt;
 and other construction industry related topics.&amp;nbsp; Without re-hashing the
 great analysis found in those articles, I thought that it would be 
helpful to point them out.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the green building front, the &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.iccsafe.org/cs/IGCC/Pages/default.aspx"&gt;International Green Construction Code or IGCC&lt;/a&gt;
 (2.0) was introduced at Green Build to much debate and acclaim. &amp;nbsp; As 
pointed out by my friend and fellow LEED AP construction attorney, Doug 
Reiser (@&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/douglasreiser" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" title="View douglasreiser&amp;#39;s Twitter Profile"&gt;douglasreiser&lt;/a&gt;) in his Builder&amp;#39;s Counsel Blog, &lt;a href="http://www.builderscounsel.com/2011/06/are-you-ready-for-the-igcc-time-to-get-educated/" target="_blank"&gt;several states</description><author>chrisghill@constructionlawva.com (Christopher G. Hill)</author><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:55:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>A Few Green Building Notes</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/05/24/a-few-green-building-notes.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/05/24/a-few-green-building-notes.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This past week, the blogosphere (if that&amp;#39;s even the word these days) has been abuzz about &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://constructionlawva.com/sustainable-construction/"&gt;green building&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://constructionlawva.com/value-added-design-go-green/"&gt;value that green can add to a project&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Three items in particular (among many) got my attention.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first of these was the fact that a new private sustainability rating system is &lt;a href="http://constructionlawnc.com/2011/05/19/isi/" target="_blank"&gt;ready for launch&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; The &lt;a href="http://www.sustainableinfrastructure.org/index.cfm" target="_blank"&gt;Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure&lt;/a&gt;
 (or ISI) is seeking public comment on its proposed envISIon.&amp;nbsp; This new 
system (aptly dubbed Version 1.0) will go &amp;quot;live&amp;quot; in July for comment.&amp;nbsp; 
Why mention this new system?&amp;nbsp; First of all, ISI&amp;#39;s founding members are 
the &lt;a href="http://www.asce.org/" target</description><author>chrisghill@constructionlawva.com (Christopher G. Hill)</author><pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 12:48:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Green Building- Interesting Third Party Issues</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/05/11/green-building-interesting-third-party-issues.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/05/11/green-building-interesting-third-party-issues.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:x-small;"&gt;&lt;small&gt;Originally posted 2009-08-24 09:00:00.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As I was following some of the posts by @&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/imadnaffa" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" title="View imadnaffa&amp;#39;s Twitter Profile"&gt;imadnaffa&lt;/a&gt; on Twitter, I came across a &lt;a href="http://www.bdcnetwork.com/article/CA6676277.html" target="_blank"&gt;post&lt;/a&gt;
 by a consultant that guarantees LEED Certification.&amp;nbsp; This got me 
thinking about the myriad issues relating to the third party 
certification aspect of adding such certification to construction 
contracts and the relationship of consultants to this process.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Much has already been said, particularly at the &lt;a href="http://greenbuildinglawupdate.com/" target="_blank"&gt;Green Building Law Update&lt;/a&gt;, a great blog by my friend Chris Cheatham (@&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/chrischeatham" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" title="View chrischeatham&amp;#39;s Twitter Profile"&gt;chrischeatham&lt;/a&gt;
 on Twitter</description><author>chrisghill@constructionlawva.com (Christopher G. Hill)</author><pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 07:12:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Columbia Law School Center for Climate Change Law: New York City Announces Green Lease Project</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/04/25/columbia-law-school-center-for-climate-change-law-new-york-city-announces-green-lease-project.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/04/25/columbia-law-school-center-for-climate-change-law-new-york-city-announces-green-lease-project.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p style="padding-left:60px;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/environmental-climatechangelaw/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Environmental+Law+LC/Columbia-Law-Climate-Change-Banner.jpg" alt="Columbia Law School Center for Climate Change Law" style="max-width:550px;border:0;" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/realestatelaw/themes/practicearea/utility/www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/ENVIRONMENTAL-CLIMATECHANGELAW/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Author+Thumbnails/J-Cullen-Howe-Thumbnail.jpg" alt="J. Cullen Howe" style="max-width:550px;border:0;" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span</description><author>CullenHowe@placeholder.com (J. Cullen Howe)</author><pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:17:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Columbia Law School Center for Climate Change Law: Building Energy Audits and Benchmarking – A Growing Trend</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/04/24/columbia-law-school-center-for-climate-change-law-building-energy-audits-and-benchmarking-a-growing-trend.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/04/24/columbia-law-school-center-for-climate-change-law-building-energy-audits-and-benchmarking-a-growing-trend.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p style="padding-left:60px;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/environmental-climatechangelaw/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Environmental+Law+LC/Columbia-Law-Climate-Change-Banner.jpg" alt="Columbia Law School Center for Climate Change" style="max-width:550px;border:0;" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/themes/practicearea/utility/www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/ENVIRONMENTAL-CLIMATECHANGELAW/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Author+Thumbnails/J-Cullen-Howe-Thumbnail.jpg" alt="J. Cullen Howe" style="max-width:550px;border:0;" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:x-small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;</description><author>CullenHowe@placeholder.com (J. Cullen Howe)</author><pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 12:56:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Columbia Law School Center for Climate Change Law: ASTM Releases Standard for Measuring Energy Performance of Commercial Buildings in Real Estate Transactions</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/04/19/columbia-law-school-center-climate-change-law-astm-standard-measuring-energy-performance-commercial-buildings-real-estate-transactions.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/04/19/columbia-law-school-center-climate-change-law-astm-standard-measuring-energy-performance-commercial-buildings-real-estate-transactions.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p style="padding-left:60px;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/environmental-climatechangelaw/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Environmental+Law+LC/Columbia-Law-Climate-Change-Banner.jpg" alt="Columbia Law School Center for Climate Change Law" style="max-width:550px;border:0;" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/realestatelaw/themes/practicearea/utility/www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/ENVIRONMENTAL-CLIMATECHANGELAW/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Author+Thumbnails/J-Cullen-Howe-Thumbnail.jpg" alt="J. Cullen Howe" style="max-width:550px;border:0;" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;By J. Cullen Howe, Environmental</description><author>CullenHowe@placeholder.com (J. Cullen Howe)</author><pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:45:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Columbia Law School Center for Climate Change Law: President Obama Launches Better Buildings Initiative</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/04/19/columbia-law-school-center-for-climate-change-law-president-obama-launches-better-buildings-initiative.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/04/19/columbia-law-school-center-for-climate-change-law-president-obama-launches-better-buildings-initiative.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p style="padding-left:60px;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/environmental-climatechangelaw/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Environmental+Law+LC/Columbia-Law-Climate-Change-Banner.jpg" alt="Columbia Law School Center for Climate Change Law" style="max-width:550px;border:0;" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/themes/practicearea/utility/www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/ENVIRONMENTAL-CLIMATECHANGELAW/cfs-filesystemfile.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Author+Thumbnails/J-Cullen-Howe-Thumbnail.jpg" alt="J. Cullen Howe" style="max-width:550px;border:0;" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:x-small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:small;</description><author>CullenHowe@placeholder.com (J. Cullen Howe)</author><pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:55:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>FTC Announces Settlement with “Tested Green” over Environmental Certifications</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/01/18/ftc-announces-settlement-with-tested-green-over-environmental-certifications.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2011/01/18/ftc-announces-settlement-with-tested-green-over-environmental-certifications.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.fgkks.com/default.asp"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/greenbuildings/1_2D00_18_2D00_2011-12_2D00_32_2D00_55-PM.png" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Federal Trade Commission announced Tuesday that it reached an 
agreement with Tested Green settling allegations that the company sold 
worthless environmental certifications and falsely represented that its 
certifications were endorsed by independent firms when the firms were 
actually owned by Tested Green. This settlement is another example of 
the FTC&amp;#39;s continuing focus on green marketing claims, coming only a few 
months after the FTC announced its proposed revisions to the Green 
Guides. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to the FTC, Tested Green advertised, marketed, 
and sold environmental certifications, but never tested any of the 
companies it provided with certifications. Tested</description><author>FrankfurtKurnitKleinSelz@placeholder.com (Frankfurt Kurnit Klein &amp; Selz)</author><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 13:33:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Study Ranks Top 10 in Green Homebuilding; Reveals Need for Improvement</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2010/12/09/study-ranks-top-10-in-green-homebuilding-reveals-need-for-improvement.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/greenbuildings/archive/2010/12/09/study-ranks-top-10-in-green-homebuilding-reveals-need-for-improvement.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Recently, &lt;b&gt;Calvert Investments&lt;/b&gt;, a Bethesda, M.D.-based investment group, released a study entitled  &amp;ldquo;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.calvert.com/newsArticle.html?article=17221"&gt;A Green Recovery for America&amp;rsquo;s Homebuilders? A Survey of Sustainable Practices by the Homebuilding Industry&lt;/a&gt;,&amp;rdquo; which examined America&amp;rsquo;s 10 largest publicly traded homebuilders and their policies/practices related to green building. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The study examined the builders using five major areas, each one presenting significant challenges to the industry--land, building materials, energy, water, and climate change. The study, which ranked Los Angeles-based KB Home, No. 1, and Pulte Homes of Bloomfield Hills, No. 2, showed that out of a possible 42 points, the nation&amp;#39;s top 10 builders averaged 6 points or around 15%. However, without KB Home and Pulte Homes, the average dropped significantly--an average of less than 6%.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The top 10 homebuilders, with their 2008</description><author>LexisNexisStaffRealEstate@lexisnexis.com (LexisNexis Real Estate Law Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 07:14:00 -0400</pubDate></item></channel></rss>