﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../StyleSheet/rss.xsl"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Real Estate Law Community Videocasts</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/realestatelaw</link><description>LexisNexis Real Estate Law Community</description><copyright>http://www.lexisnexis.com/terms/copyright.aspx</copyright><atom:link href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/realestatelaw/Rss.aspx?id=440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Weekly LexisNexis Video News Update - December 2, 2010</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/videocasts/archive/2010/12/02/weekly-lexisnexis-video-news-update-december-2-2010.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/videocasts/archive/2010/12/02/weekly-lexisnexis-video-news-update-december-2-2010.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Among the stories on this video edition of LexisNexis
Legal News:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo has announced that
ExxonMobil has agreed to pay $ 25 million for penalties, costs and restoration
of areas of Brooklyn that were contaminated as a result of an oil
spill; and &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;More
than 10,000 of the claimants eligible to participate in the World Trade Center
Disaster Site settlement process in the Southern District of New York have
chosen to opt in.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Please visit the site to view this media)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>LexisNexisStaffRealEstate@lexisnexis.com (LexisNexis Real Estate Law Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 11:28:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Weekly LexisNexis Video News Update - October 18, 2010</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/videocasts/archive/2010/10/18/weekly-lexisnexis-video-news-update-october-18-2010.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/videocasts/archive/2010/10/18/weekly-lexisnexis-video-news-update-october-18-2010.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Among the stories on this video edition of LexisNexis Legal
News: &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;the
Supreme Court on Oct. 12 denied a petition filed by
a Pennsylvania woman seeking review of a Third Circuit ruling.&amp;nbsp; The
Circuit Court affirmed a directed verdict in favor of her mortgage lender and
loan servicer in a dispute over an adjustable-rate mortgage loan;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
claims
that a Pennsylvania hotel unlawfully denied a Connecticut church group
accommodations will proceed as a class action. A Connecticut federal judge
certified a class made up of members of the Macedonia Church and their
relatives and friends who participated in a church trip to Lancaster,
Pennsylvania in the summer of 2004, and were denied accommodations at the
Lancaster Host Resort and Conference Center.&amp;nbsp; The church members say it
was because of their race; and&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;the Supreme
Court has invited the acting solicitor general of the United States to file
briefs regarding the government&amp;#39;s</description><author>LexisNexisStaffRealEstate@lexisnexis.com (LexisNexis Real Estate Law Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 06:00:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Weekly LexisNexis Video News Update - September 22, 2010</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/videocasts/archive/2010/09/23/weekly-lexisnexis-video-news-update-september-22-2010.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/videocasts/archive/2010/09/23/weekly-lexisnexis-video-news-update-september-22-2010.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Among the stories on this video edition of LexisNexis
Legal News, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers did not &amp;quot;make&amp;quot; a
contractor use the exact backfill material that was used for the Inner Harbor
Navigation Canal Lock Replacement Project in New Orleans, nor did it &amp;quot;require&amp;quot;
the contractor to select the compaction method that was employed in the
project.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; On Sept. 14, the Fifth Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a lower court&amp;#39;s finding that the
contractor is entitled to government-contractor immunity in a case stemming
from Hurricane Katrina flood damages.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Also, Maryland federal Judge J. Frederick Motz in mid-September
reluctantly allowed the mayor and City Council of Baltimore a third chance to
amend a lawsuit against Wells Fargo Bank.&amp;nbsp;
The city contends the bank&amp;#39;s discriminatory and predatory lending
practices led to a high number of foreclosures in black neighborhoods in the
city resulting in decreased</description><author>LexisNexisStaffRealEstate@lexisnexis.com (LexisNexis Real Estate Law Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:55:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Weekly LexisNexis Video News Update - September 13, 2010</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/videocasts/archive/2010/09/13/weekly-lexisnexis-video-news-update-september-10-2010.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/videocasts/archive/2010/09/13/weekly-lexisnexis-video-news-update-september-10-2010.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Among the stories on this video edition of LexisNexis
Legal News, a unanimous 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on
September 3 overturned a $926 million dollar judgment against Rockwell
International and Dow Chemical Company.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;The judgment involved
continuing trespass and nuisance claims over plutonium contamination around the
Rocky Flats Nuclear Weapons Plant.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Please visit the site to view this media)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>LexisNexisStaffRealEstate@lexisnexis.com (LexisNexis Real Estate Law Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:02:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Neil A. Stein of Kaplin Stewart on Green Project Risks</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/videocasts/archive/2010/09/06/neil-a-stein-of-kaplin-stewart-on-green-project-risks.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/videocasts/archive/2010/09/06/neil-a-stein-of-kaplin-stewart-on-green-project-risks.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Neil A. Stein, a principal of the Philadelphia-area law firm
of Kaplin Stewart, has represented landowners, developers, institutions and
non-profit groups for more than 25 years in each and every phase of the real
estate transaction including structuring, financing, land use approvals, land
use litigation, eminent domain and community association documentation.&amp;nbsp; In this clip, Stein answers the question:
What are the potential risks associated with green building projects?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;object width="640" height="385"&gt;
&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6CrhbrroFlM?fs=1&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;rel=0" /&gt;
&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /&gt;
&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6CrhbrroFlM?fs=1&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="385"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;
&lt;/object&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>HBL@litigationconferences.com (HB Litigation Conferences)</author><pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 22:00:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Weekly LexisNexis Video News Update - Aug 18, 2010</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/videocasts/archive/2010/08/19/weekly-lexisnexis-video-news-update-aug-18-2010.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/videocasts/archive/2010/08/19/weekly-lexisnexis-video-news-update-aug-18-2010.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Saying that a class action settlement of Chinese drywall liability against a retailer is an &amp;quot;end-run&amp;quot; around the federal multidistrict litigation, the MDL plaintiffs have asked the judge to enjoin the settlement.  LexisNexis Mealeys Construction Defects editor Gerry Matics is following that story.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Please visit the site to view this media)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>LexisNexisStaffRealEstate@lexisnexis.com (LexisNexis Real Estate Law Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:16:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Questions Answered by Joshua Stein, Author of the New Guide to Troubled Commercial Real Estate Loans for Lenders and Borrowers</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/videocasts/archive/2010/08/03/questions-answered-by-joshua-stein-author-of-the-new-guide-to-troubled-commercial-real-estate-loans-for-lenders-and-borrowers.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/videocasts/archive/2010/08/03/questions-answered-by-joshua-stein-author-of-the-new-guide-to-troubled-commercial-real-estate-loans-for-lenders-and-borrowers.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The &lt;i&gt;New&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;i&gt; Guide to
Troubled Commercial Real Estate Loans for Lenders and Borrowers&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;is&lt;i&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/store/catalog/booktemplate/productdetail.jsp?pageName=relatedProducts&amp;amp;skuId=sku1690311&amp;amp;catId=147&amp;amp;prodId=prod12750438&amp;amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00207" target="_blank"&gt;available at the LexisNexis Store&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Liability&lt;/strong&gt;: Why do you say that
lender liability, to some degree, is old news?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;object height="360" width="640"&gt;
&lt;param value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Jh_YckLTwk8?version=3&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;rel=0" name="movie" /&gt;
&lt;param value="true" name="allowFullScreen" /&gt;
&lt;param value="always" name="allowscriptaccess" /&gt;&lt;embed height="360" width="640" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Jh_YckLTwk8?version=3&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;rel=0"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;
&lt;/object&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Suggestions</description><author>LexisNexisStaffRealEstate@lexisnexis.com (LexisNexis Real Estate Law Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 10:55:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Weekly LexisNexis Video News Update - Aug 2, 2010</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/videocasts/archive/2010/08/02/weekly-lexisnexis-video-news-update-aug-2-2010.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/videocasts/archive/2010/08/02/weekly-lexisnexis-video-news-update-aug-2-2010.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A Los Angeles judge has held that the constitution
does not support a jury&amp;#39;s $ 200 million punitive damages award in an asbestos
case.&amp;nbsp; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Please visit the site to view this media)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>LexisNexisStaffRealEstate@lexisnexis.com (LexisNexis Real Estate Law Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 07:38:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Weekly LexisNexis Video News Update - July 26, 2010</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/videocasts/archive/2010/07/26/weekly-lexisnexis-video-news-update-july-26-2010.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/videocasts/archive/2010/07/26/weekly-lexisnexis-video-news-update-july-26-2010.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Louisiana
Governor Bobby Jindal in July signed into law a measure aimed at prohibiting
insurance companies from dropping policy holders who filed claims based on the
presence of defective Chinese drywall in their homes.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Please visit the site to view this media)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>LexisNexisStaffRealEstate@lexisnexis.com (LexisNexis Real Estate Law Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:39:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Weekly LexisNexis Video News Update - July 14, 2010</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/videocasts/archive/2010/07/14/weekly-lexisnexis-video-news-update-july-14-2010.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/videocasts/archive/2010/07/14/weekly-lexisnexis-video-news-update-july-14-2010.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Among the stories on
this video edition of LexisNexis Legal News, a New York
federal judge on July 1 approved a $1.2 billion settlement between property
damage claimants and airline companies on claims stemming from the Sept. 11,
2001, terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Please visit the site to view this media)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>LexisNexisStaffRealEstate@lexisnexis.com (LexisNexis Real Estate Law Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 17:39:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Weekly LexisNexis Video News Update - June 21, 2010</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/videocasts/archive/2010/06/21/weekly-lexisnexis-video-news-update-june-21-2010.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/videocasts/archive/2010/06/21/weekly-lexisnexis-video-news-update-june-21-2010.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Among the stories on this video edition of LexisNexis
Legal News, a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court on June 14 held that an attorney
fees award is payable to the litigant; therefore, it is subject to an offset to
satisfy the litigant&amp;#39;s pre-existing obligation, when a debt is owed to the
government, and, a key Chinese drywall manufacturer that had a default judgment
entered against it in May finally appeared in court, only to serve notice that
it is appealing the judgment.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Please visit the site to view this media)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>LexisNexisStaffRealEstate@lexisnexis.com (LexisNexis Real Estate Law Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:34:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Green Building Blogger Shari Shapiro on Energy Regulation, Renewable Energy and Green Building Law, and LEED Decertification</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/videocasts/archive/2010/06/04/green-building-blogger-shari-shapiro-on-energy-regulation-renewable-energy-and-green-building-law-and-leed-decertification.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/videocasts/archive/2010/06/04/green-building-blogger-shari-shapiro-on-energy-regulation-renewable-energy-and-green-building-law-and-leed-decertification.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Shari Shapiro, an attorney and LEED Accredited
Professional, focuses her practice on green building law, which includes
sustainable project financing, regulatory drafting, land use approvals,
contracts, and conflict resolution. Shapiro is the Sustainability Coordinator
for Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell &amp;amp; Hippel LLP&amp;#39;s Sustainability
Initiative.&amp;nbsp; She&amp;#39;s also a prolific
blogger (greenbuildinglawblog.com).&amp;nbsp;
Shapiro spoke with HB Litigation Conferences&amp;#39; Tom Hagy to create three
clips.&amp;nbsp; Here, she answers the questions:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; What does the future hold for U.S. energy
regulation?&amp;nbsp; How will it impact the
practice of green building law and environmental law?&amp;nbsp; Click and hear what she had to say.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;object width="640" height="385"&gt;
&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/p2et5bXAyiE&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;" /&gt;
&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /&gt;
&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /&gt;&lt;embed src="http</description><author>HBL@litigationconferences.com (HB Litigation Conferences)</author><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 16:29:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Mark Bennett of Miller Canfield Interviews Kevin Kampschroer, Director of GSA's Office of High-Performance Federal Green Buildings</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/videocasts/archive/2009/03/04/Mark-Bennett-of-Miller-Canfield-Interviews-Kevin-Kampschroer_2C00_-Director-of-GSA_2700_s-Office-of-High_2D00_Performance-Federal-Green-Buildings.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/videocasts/archive/2009/03/04/Mark-Bennett-of-Miller-Canfield-Interviews-Kevin-Kampschroer_2C00_-Director-of-GSA_2700_s-Office-of-High_2D00_Performance-Federal-Green-Buildings.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE:10pt;FONT-FAMILY:Arial;mso-fareast-font-family:Verdana;"&gt;The GSA&amp;#39;s Office of High-Performance Federal Green Buildings (OHPFGB) must move quickly to obligate most of the $4.5 billion it has received under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. In this video, Mark Bennett of Miller Canfield interviews Kevin Kampschroer, the Director of the OHPFGB, regarding this unprecedented green retrofit investment program.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE:9pt;FONT-FAMILY:Arial;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE:9pt;FONT-FAMILY:Arial;"&gt;&lt;embed id="VideoPlayback" style="WIDTH:400px;HEIGHT:326px;" src="http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docid=-7414507776763184583&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;fs=true" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>LNRE1@placeholder.com (LexisNexis Real Estate Law Community Staff)</author><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:25:00 -0400</pubDate></item></channel></rss>