﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../StyleSheet/rss.xsl"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Real Estate Law Community Real Estate Appraisals</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/realestatelaw</link><description>LexisNexis Real Estate Law Community</description><copyright>http://www.lexisnexis.com/terms/copyright.aspx</copyright><atom:link href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/community/realestatelaw/Rss.aspx?id=454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Williams Mullen: Proposed Rules Published on Dodd-Frank Requirements for Appraisals for Higher-Risk Mortgage Loans</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/realestateappraisals/archive/2012/10/03/williams-mullen-proposed-rules-published-on-dodd-frank-requirements-for-appraisals-for-higher-risk-mortgage-loans.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/realestateappraisals/archive/2012/10/03/williams-mullen-proposed-rules-published-on-dodd-frank-requirements-for-appraisals-for-higher-risk-mortgage-loans.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.williamsmullen.com/" target="_blank" title="Williams Mullen"&gt;&lt;img border="0" src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/realestatelawblog/4_2D00_17_2D00_2011-9_2D00_19_2D00_11-PM.jpg" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;strong&gt;BY: &lt;a href="http://www.williamsmullen.com/eharllee" target="_blank"&gt;EDMUND D. HARLLEE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.williamsmullen.com/eharllee" target="_blank"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On Wednesday, September 5, 2012, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, National Credit Union Administration, Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (the &amp;quot;Bureau&amp;quot;) and Federal Housing Finance Agency (collectively, the &amp;quot;Agencies&amp;quot;) issued proposed rules and a request for public comment on changes to Regulation Z (Truth in Lending) to implement the requirements of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform</description><author>WilliamsMullen@placeholder.com (Williams Mullen)</author><pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 07:24:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Appraiser Independence —Observations on the CFPB’s Interim Final Rule  (And What the Heck Do They Do With Those Appraiser Regulatory Fees Anyway?) </title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/realestateappraisals/archive/2012/02/17/appraiser-independence-observations-on-the-cfpb-s-interim-final-rule-and-what-the-heck-do-they-do-with-those-appraiser-regulatory-fees-anyway.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/realestateappraisals/archive/2012/02/17/appraiser-independence-observations-on-the-cfpb-s-interim-final-rule-and-what-the-heck-do-they-do-with-those-appraiser-regulatory-fees-anyway.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" title="Money Houses" href="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/realestateappraisals/2_2D00_17_2D00_2012-11_2D00_14_2D00_53-AM.png"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/realestateappraisals/2_2D00_17_2D00_2012-11_2D00_14_2D00_53-AM.png" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;By Dennis Scardilli,
Esq., MAI, SCGREA&lt;/i&gt;&lt;span style="color:#ff0000;font-family:mceinline;"&gt;1&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight:bold;color:#ff0000;font-family:mceinline;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On December 22, 2011, the federal Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau (the &amp;quot;Bureau&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;CFPB&amp;quot;) issued a &amp;quot;Restatement of Federal
Consumer Financial Law Regulations&amp;quot; under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA). Rulemaking
authority for TILA had previously been under the Board of Governors of the
Federal</description><author>dscardilli@aol.com (Dennis A. Scardilli, Esq., MAI)</author><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 11:51:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Judge Allows Homeowner's Negligence / Fraud Claims Against Appraiser To Proceed</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/realestateappraisals/archive/2011/04/25/judge-allows-homeowner-s-negligence-fraud-claims-against-appraiser-to-proceed.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/realestateappraisals/archive/2011/04/25/judge-allows-homeowner-s-negligence-fraud-claims-against-appraiser-to-proceed.aspx</guid><description>INDIANAPOLIS - An Indiana federal judge on March 14 granted a motion to dismiss a homeowner&amp;#39;s breach of contract claim and a claim for violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act against an appraisal company and its employee but found that the homeowner sufficiently pleaded claims of negligence and fraud in relation to an appraisal report that she claimed failed to note major defects with the property, including mold (Susan M. Desimone v. Quicken Loans Inc., et al., No. 1:09-cv-01421, S.D. Ind.; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26772). 
&lt;a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?canceldest=form&amp;amp;keyenum=25271&amp;amp;keytnum=0&amp;amp;searchtype=get&amp;amp;search=5-12%20LexisNexis%20Real%20Estate%20Rep.%2023%20(2011)&amp;amp;view=full&amp;amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00144" target="_blank"&gt;Full story on lexis.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>anonymous@localhost.com (Liz Barrett)</author><pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 09:21:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Keller and Heckman LLP: Fifth Circuit Addresses Lanham Act's Prudential Standing in Real-Estate Appraisers' Lawsuit</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/realestateappraisals/archive/2011/02/28/keller-and-heckman-llp-fifth-circuit-addresses-lanham-act-s-prudential-standing-in-real-estate-appraisers-lawsuit.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/realestateappraisals/archive/2011/02/28/keller-and-heckman-llp-fifth-circuit-addresses-lanham-act-s-prudential-standing-in-real-estate-appraisers-lawsuit.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.khlaw.com/index.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer.Blogs.Components.WeblogFiles/realestatelawblog/2_2D00_28_2D00_2011-3_2D00_13_2D00_50-PM.png" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;15-Second Advertising Law Alert: 5th Circuit Explores &amp;quot;Outer Limits&amp;quot; of Lanham Act Standing&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;By &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.khlaw.com/Richard-Leighton"&gt;Richard J. Leighton&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Strange facts can make strange law. The Fifth Circuit yesterday issued a strange tutorial on Lanham Act prudential standing.&lt;span&gt;*&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BACKGROUND&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Plaintiff real estate appraisers complain about two of Defendant&amp;#39;s electronic platforms used by lenders of mortgage money.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One is AppraisalPort, which lenders use to electronically order 
appraisals from Plaintiffs and receive them from those appraisers when 
done. To participate, Plaintiffs must</description><author>Keller.Heckman@placeholder.com (Keller and Heckman LLP)</author><pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:14:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Appraisals, Assessments and Zestimates, Oh My!</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/realestateappraisals/archive/2011/01/31/appraisals-assessments-and-zestimates-oh-my.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/realestateappraisals/archive/2011/01/31/appraisals-assessments-and-zestimates-oh-my.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://vetsteinlawgroup.com/"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.lexisnexis.com/Community/taxlaw/cfs-file.ashx/__key/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/Images.Tax_2C00_+Estates_2C00_+Corp/Vetstein-Logo-Header.jpg" style="max-height:15000px;max-width:15000px;" border="0" height="182" width="763" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;What Is Your Massachusetts Home Really Worth?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;By &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://vetsteinlawgroup.com/attorneys-vetstein-law-group-richard-vetstein/"&gt;Rich Vetstein&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OK folks, you want to know what your house  is worth? Stop obsessing 
 over your town assessment and online estimates.  At the end of the day,
  your house is worth what someone is willing to  pay for it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But while you follow the sale prices of your neighbor&amp;#39;s house and   
e-mail me to ask what your house is worth (sight unseen), I&amp;#39;ll explain  
 to you that it is neither an exact science, a mathematical equation, or
 a   guesstimate</description><author>VetsteinLawGroup@placeholder.com (Vetstein Law Group, P.C. )</author><pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:28:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Write on!  Let your voice be heard on new appraiser rules that affect your law practice!</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/realestateappraisals/archive/2010/11/03/write-on-let-your-voice-be-heard-on-new-appraiser-rules-that-affect-your-law-practice.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/realestateappraisals/archive/2010/11/03/write-on-let-your-voice-be-heard-on-new-appraiser-rules-that-affect-your-law-practice.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;To:&lt;b&gt; Attorneys whose practice
uses real estate appraisals &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Issue:&lt;b&gt; Your comments are
due on &lt;i&gt;Federal Reserve Board Interim
Rules on Appraiser Independence &lt;/i&gt;by Friday, December 17, 2010&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Conclusion:&lt;b&gt; This
affects your practice!&amp;nbsp; &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#39;s reading and comment time in
the Real Estate Appraisal Law world. Government-related entities have released several
documents of great interest to lawyers whose practice involves valuation of
real property. These include the Federal Reserve Board&amp;#39;s &lt;b&gt;Interim Final Rule on Appraiser Independence&lt;/b&gt;-&lt;b&gt;the subject of this
blawg.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left:30px;"&gt;(I plan to discuss in &lt;i&gt;future&lt;/i&gt; blawgs:&amp;nbsp; FannieMae and FreddieMac&amp;#39;s revised &lt;b&gt;guidelines&lt;/b&gt; on that same issue, FHA&amp;#39;s updated
&lt;b&gt;FAQS&lt;/b&gt; including valuation issues, and
the Appraisal Standards Board&amp;#39;s &lt;b&gt;proposed
requirements&lt;/b&gt; that will affect your ability &lt;b&gt;to obtain your client&amp;#39;s appraiser&amp;#39;s</description><author>dscardilli@aol.com (Dennis A. Scardilli, Esq., MAI)</author><pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 17:41:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Exciting Time in Real Estate Appraisal Law</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/realestateappraisals/archive/2010/10/26/exciting-time-in-real-estate-appraisal-law.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/realestateappraisals/archive/2010/10/26/exciting-time-in-real-estate-appraisal-law.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Does your law practice have&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;anything&lt;/i&gt;&amp;nbsp;to do with the value of real estate?
For example, real estate closings, land use approvals and development (strike
all that: I meant workouts, foreclosure defense and mortgage modifications).
Maybe you practice family law and need appraisals for property settlements. Or,
you are a tax lawyer and represent clients before the IRS, or federal or state
tax courts? Insurance, M&amp;amp;A lawyers, gather &amp;#39;round. Are you a proud
tree-hugging environmental lawyer, an energy company attorney, a construction
mediator or do you represent a union looking at sustainable development as a
job creator? Who you gonna&amp;#39; call to determine the legal issues in the valuation
of projects like Las Vegas City Center, the largest LEED project in the world?
If your law practice has anything at all to do with real property value, you
will want to pay attention to what is happening right now in real estate
appraisal law.&amp;nbsp; It&amp;#39;s big.&amp;nbsp;</description><author>dscardilli@aol.com (Dennis A. Scardilli, Esq., MAI)</author><pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:30:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Real Cases in Real Estate by Andrea Lee Negroni, Esq. – Oct. 25th Update: Overappraising and Underappraising</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/realestateappraisals/archive/2010/10/26/real-cases-in-real-estate-by-andrea-lee-negroni-esq-oct-25th-update-overappraising-and-underappraising.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/realestateappraisals/archive/2010/10/26/real-cases-in-real-estate-by-andrea-lee-negroni-esq-oct-25th-update-overappraising-and-underappraising.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Real
Cases in Real Estate&lt;/b&gt;
is a weekly update on real estate law, with legal principles illustrated and
explained by lawsuits from around the country. The topics are wide-ranging for
appeal to a broad spectrum of readers including lawyers, homeowners, investors
and the general public. &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Andrea Lee Negroni,&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; a Washington DC
attorney and legal writer with 25 years of experience in financial services and
mortgage law, contributes the case summaries.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Followers of
&lt;b&gt;Real Cases in Real Estate &lt;/b&gt;will learn and be entertained by lawsuits
involving nuisance, trespass, zoning violations, deed restrictions, title
insurance, public utilities, mechanics liens, construction defects, adverse
possession, foreclosure and eviction, divorce and marital property rights,
tenants&amp;#39; rights, and more. &lt;b&gt;Real Cases in Real Estate&lt;/b&gt; uncovers the
unpredictable, amusing, and sometimes outrageous disputes between next-door
neighbors, contractors and homeowners, condo</description><author>AndreaNegroni@placeholder.com (Andrea Lee Negroni)</author><pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:28:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Federal Reserve Issues Interim Final Rule Regarding Real Estate Appraisals</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/realestateappraisals/archive/2010/10/18/federal-reserve-issues-interim-final-rule-regarding-real-estate-appraisals.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/realestateappraisals/archive/2010/10/18/federal-reserve-issues-interim-final-rule-regarding-real-estate-appraisals.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Today, the Federal Reserve issued an interim final rule and request for 
public comment regarding real estate appraisals, implementing Section 
1472 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. 
The interim rule is intended to protect &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.martindale.com/real-estate-law/article_Alston-Bird-LLP_1168926.htm"&gt;Read More...&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>martindalehub@hotmail.com (Martindale.com)</author><pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:25:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Tax Court rejects charitable easement deductions because taxpayer lacked a qualified appraisal of the easement to substantiate deductions: Lord v. Comm'r (Sept. 8, 2010)</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/realestateappraisals/archive/2010/09/21/tax-court-rejects-charitable-easement-deductions-because-taxpayer-lacked-a-qualified-appraisal-of-the-easement-to-substantiate-deductions-lord-v-comm-r-sept-8-2010.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/realestateappraisals/archive/2010/09/21/tax-court-rejects-charitable-easement-deductions-because-taxpayer-lacked-a-qualified-appraisal-of-the-easement-to-substantiate-deductions-lord-v-comm-r-sept-8-2010.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Taxpayer
granted a deed-of-conservation easement relating to his property to an
organization exempt from Federal income taxation pursuant to &lt;a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?app=00075&amp;amp;view=full&amp;amp;searchtype=get&amp;amp;search=26+USCS+%A7+501&amp;amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00207" target="_blank"&gt;section 501(c)(3)&lt;/a&gt;. Page Appraisal Co. produced an appraisal
report stating the easement contribution&amp;#39;s estimated market value. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Taxpayer
claimed a deduction for a noncash charitable contribution of more than $5,000.
However, the Tax Commissioner contended that the taxpayer failed to obtain a
qualified appraisal to substantiate the easement contribution pursuant to Income
Tax Regs section 1.170A-13(c), &lt;a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?app=00075&amp;amp;view=full&amp;amp;searchtype=get&amp;amp;search=26+CFR+1.170A-13&amp;amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00207" target="_blank" title="Clicking this link retrieves the full text document in another window"&gt;26
CFR 1.170A-13&lt;/a&gt; and was therefore</description><author>LNEPEL@placeholder.com (LexisNexis Estate and Elder Law Center Staff)</author><pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:22:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Stepped Up Basis At Death—How High?</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/realestateappraisals/archive/2010/09/01/stepped-up-basis-at-death-how-high.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/realestateappraisals/archive/2010/09/01/stepped-up-basis-at-death-how-high.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When the
owner of an asset dies, in most cases the cost or basis of the asset for income
tax purposes is increased to its fair market value.&amp;nbsp; When the asset is later sold, there is no
capital gain on the amount of the step up.&amp;nbsp;
Stated differently, capital gain is only assessed on the appreciation
occurring after the owner&amp;#39;s death.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Assets such
as real estate and businesses need to be appraised by an appraiser to
substantiate the date of death value, but it does not follow that a 
higher
appraisal is always&amp;nbsp; better.&amp;nbsp; In many estate plans, assets are divided 
into
revocable and irrevocable trusts when one spouse dies.&amp;nbsp; One purpose of 
this is to protect the first-spouse-to-die&amp;#39;s estate tax exemption (the 
amount the first-spouse-to-die can
give away without estate tax).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Typically,
the first-spouse-to-die&amp;#39;s exemption is protected by placing that portion into
an irrevocable trust as to which the Surviving Spouse receives</description><author>rspiro@earthlink.net (Randy Spiro)</author><pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 12:16:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Property Tax Gaffe: Purchase Price Equated With Market Value</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/realestateappraisals/archive/2010/01/05/property-tax-gaffe-purchase-price-equated-with-market-value.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/realestateappraisals/archive/2010/01/05/property-tax-gaffe-purchase-price-equated-with-market-value.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Three recent Supreme Court of Ohio property tax decisions purport to 
examine the propriety of using the purchase price of a particular 
property as prima facie evidence of market value for property tax 
assessment purposes. In each case, the Court decided that the purchase 
price was equivalent to the property&amp;#39;s market value, despite accepted 
appraisal practice standards, GAAP pronouncements, and actual legal 
contractual arrangements.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Honorable Chief Justice Thomas Moyer wrote the majority opinion for the Ohio Supreme Court decision in AEI Net Lease Income &amp;amp; Growth Fund v. Erie County Bd. of Revision, 119 Ohio St. 3d 563 (Ohio 2008) [&lt;a href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?app=00075&amp;amp;view=full&amp;amp;searchtype=get&amp;amp;search=119+Ohio+St.+3d+563&amp;amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00207" target="_blank"&gt;enhanced
version available to lexis.com subscribers&lt;/a&gt; /&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href="http://www.lexisone.com/lx1/caselaw/freecaselaw?searchType=citation&amp;amp;fclSearch=119+Ohio</description><author>joe.calvanico@gt.com (Joseph J. Calvanico)</author><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 11:44:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Judge Finds Flaws in Minnesota Retail Mall Appraisals</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/realestateappraisals/archive/2009/11/04/judge-finds-flaws-in-minnesota-retail-mall-appraisals.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/realestateappraisals/archive/2009/11/04/judge-finds-flaws-in-minnesota-retail-mall-appraisals.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In
 the past several years, Judge Sheryl Ramstad has decided no less than 
seven cases in favor of government. Not only did those cases go against 
the taxpayer - Judge Ramstad actually increased the assessment to values
 higher than were estimated by assessors!&amp;nbsp; Most 
were decided on her own application of the data and approaches used by 
individual appraisers representing a particular side of the argument. In
 some cases, she selectively used portions of opposing appraiser&amp;#39;s 
viewpoints. &amp;nbsp;A prime example is &lt;a title="Clicking this link retrieves the full text document in another window" href="http://www.lexis.com/research/xlink?app=00075&amp;amp;view=full&amp;amp;searchtype=get&amp;amp;search=2009+Minn.+Tax+LEXIS+22&amp;amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00207" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Eden Prairie Mall LLC v. County of Hennepin&lt;/i&gt;, 2009 Minn. Tax LEXIS 22 (Minn. T.C. Oct. 13, 2009)&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In
 the instant case, the subject of the appeal was the main mall building 
and one of the anchor</description><author>joe.calvanico@gt.com (Joseph J. Calvanico)</author><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:40:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>James M. Wilson Jr. Discusses the Recent Disclosures By Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac of Losses Attributable to Sub-Prime Mortgages, and Allegations of Collusion to Inflate Appraisals</title><link>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/realestateappraisals/archive/2008/02/06/james-m-wilson-jr-discusses-the-recent-disclosures-by-fannie-mae-and-freddie-mac-of-losses-attributable-to-sub-prime-mortgages-and-allegations-of-collusion-to-inflate-appraisals.aspx</link><guid>http://www.lexisnexis.com/COMMUNITY/REALESTATELAW/blogs/realestateappraisals/archive/2008/02/06/james-m-wilson-jr-discusses-the-recent-disclosures-by-fannie-mae-and-freddie-mac-of-losses-attributable-to-sub-prime-mortgages-and-allegations-of-collusion-to-inflate-appraisals.aspx</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;It
 now appears that the Federal National Mortgage Association (&amp;quot;Fannie 
Mae&amp;quot;) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (&amp;quot;Freddie Mac&amp;quot;) are
 subject to the same kind of bruising losses afflicting other large 
financial institutions as a result of sub-prime mortgage-related 
investments. James M. Wilson discusses the effect of that risk exposure,
 and of the alleged involvement of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the 
artificial inflation of home appraisal values, on the housing market&amp;#39;s 
near-term future. Mr. Wilson writes that &amp;quot;the recent disclosures, 
investigations and lawsuits are all too familiar to Fannie Mae and 
Freddie Mac investors and have dampened expectations that the GSEs could
 bailout the suffering housing market.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.lexis.com/xlink?showcidslinks=on&amp;amp;searchtype=get&amp;amp;search=2008%20Emerging%20Issues%201798&amp;amp;ORIGINATION_CODE=00207"&gt;Subscribers can access the complete</description><author>James.M.Wilson@placeholder.com (James M. Wilson, Jr.)</author><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:26:00 -0400</pubDate></item></channel></rss>