Welcome to the Annals of Emergency Medicine article feedback survey. Please take a second to give us your thoughts on the articles below. Your opinions are very important and will enable us to draw a composite picture of how this journal is read. We will use this information to make our journal even more responsive to your interests. All answers will be kept confidential and will be used in combination with others from around the world.
1.	Article: Increased Blood Pressure in the Emergency Department: Pain, Anxiety, or Undiagnosed Hypertension?(pages 221 - 229)   a. How did you read this article? Read entire article Only skimmed the article Read only the abstract Read only the capsule summary I skipped the article   b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article? Excellent Great Good Mediocre Poor   c. Please rate the readability of this article: Great Good Fair Poor Very poor   d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice: Very useful Somewhat useful Not very useful Not applicable   e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is: Way too many A few too many About right Too few Way too few   f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:
2.	Article: Utility of Routine Testing for Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Blood Pressure Elevation in the Emergency Department(pages 231 - 239)   a. How did you read this article? Read entire article Only skimmed the article Read only the abstract Read only the capsule summary I skipped the article   b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article? Excellent Great Good Mediocre Poor   c. Please rate the readability of this article: Great Good Fair Poor Very poor   d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice: Very useful Somewhat useful Not very useful Not applicable   e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is: Way too many A few too many About right Too few Way too few   f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:
3.	Article: Low Diagnostic Yield of Electrocardiogram Testing in Younger Patients With Syncope(pages 240 - 246.e1)   a. How did you read this article? Read entire article Only skimmed the article Read only the abstract Read only the capsule summary I skipped the article   b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article? Excellent Great Good Mediocre Poor   c. Please rate the readability of this article: Great Good Fair Poor Very poor   d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice: Very useful Somewhat useful Not very useful Not applicable   e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is: Way too many A few too many About right Too few Way too few   f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:
4.	Article: Treatment of Massive Fluid Overload as a Result of Constrictive Pericarditis With Ultrafiltration in the Emergency Department(pages 247 - 250)   a. How did you read this article? Read entire article Only skimmed the article Read only the abstract Read only the capsule summary I skipped the article   b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article? Excellent Great Good Mediocre Poor   c. Please rate the readability of this article: Great Good Fair Poor Very poor   d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice: Very useful Somewhat useful Not very useful Not applicable   e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is: Way too many A few too many About right Too few Way too few   f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:
5.	Article: Characteristics of Patient Care Management Problems Identified in Emergency Department Morbidity and Mortality Investigations During 15 Years(pages 251 - 261.e1)   a. How did you read this article? Read entire article Only skimmed the article Read only the abstract Read only the capsule summary I skipped the article   b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article? Excellent Great Good Mediocre Poor   c. Please rate the readability of this article: Great Good Fair Poor Very poor   d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice: Very useful Somewhat useful Not very useful Not applicable   e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is: Way too many A few too many About right Too few Way too few   f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:
6.	Article: Decreasing Reimbursements for Outpatient Emergency Department Visits Across Payer Groups From 1996 to 2004(pages 265- 274. e5)   a. How did you read this article? Read entire article Only skimmed the article Read only the abstract Read only the capsule summary I skipped the article   b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article? Excellent Great Good Mediocre Poor   c. Please rate the readability of this article: Great Good Fair Poor Very poor   d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice: Very useful Somewhat useful Not very useful Not applicable   e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is: Way too many A few too many About right Too few Way too few   f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:
7.	Article: TelEmergency: A Novel System for Delivering Emergency Care to Rural Hospitals(pages 275 - 284)   a. How did you read this article? Read entire article Only skimmed the article Read only the abstract Read only the capsule summary I skipped the article   b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article? Excellent Great Good Mediocre Poor   c. Please rate the readability of this article: Great Good Fair Poor Very poor   d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice: Very useful Somewhat useful Not very useful Not applicable   e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is: Way too many A few too many About right Too few Way too few   f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:
8.	Article: Increased US Emergency Department Visits for Skin and Soft Tissue Infections, and Changes in Antibiotic Choices, During the Emergence of Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus(pages 291 - 298)   a. How did you read this article? Read entire article Only skimmed the article Read only the abstract Read only the capsule summary I skipped the article   b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article? Excellent Great Good Mediocre Poor   c. Please rate the readability of this article: Great Good Fair Poor Very poor   d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice: Very useful Somewhat useful Not very useful Not applicable   e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is: Way too many A few too many About right Too few Way too few   f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:
9.	Article: Patient Acceptance of Rapid HIV Testing Practices in an Urban Emergency Department: Assessment of the 2006 CDC Recommendations for HIV Screening in Health Care Settings(pages 303 - 309.e1)   a. How did you read this article? Read entire article Only skimmed the article Read only the abstract Read only the capsule summary I skipped the article   b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article? Excellent Great Good Mediocre Poor   c. Please rate the readability of this article: Great Good Fair Poor Very poor   d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice: Very useful Somewhat useful Not very useful Not applicable   e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is: Way too many A few too many About right Too few Way too few   f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:
10.	Article: Short-term Prognosis of Stroke Among Patients Diagnosed in the Emergency Department With a Transient Ischemic Attack(pages 316 - 323)   a. How did you read this article? Read entire article Only skimmed the article Read only the abstract Read only the capsule summary I skipped the article   b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article? Excellent Great Good Mediocre Poor   c. Please rate the readability of this article: Great Good Fair Poor Very poor   d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice: Very useful Somewhat useful Not very useful Not applicable   e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is: Way too many A few too many About right Too few Way too few   f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:   Contact the questionnaire administrator with any questions or problems.