Welcome to the Annals of Emergency Medicine article feedback survey. Please take a second to give us your thoughts on the articles below. Your opinions are very important and will enable us to draw a composite picture of how this journal is read. We will use this information to make our journal even more responsive to your interests. All answers will be kept confidential and will be used in combination with others from around the world.
1.	Article: Quantitative Assessment of Diagnostic Radiation Doses in Adult Blunt Trauma Patients(pages 93 - 97)   a. How did you read this article? Read entire article Only skimmed the article Read only the abstract Read only the capsule summary I skipped the article   b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article? Excellent Great Good Mediocre Poor   c. Please rate the readability of this article: Great Good Fair Poor Very poor   d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice: Very useful Somewhat useful Not very useful Not applicable   e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is: Way too many A few too many About right Too few Way too few   f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:
2.	Article: Bilateral Compartment Syndrome as a Result of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Thrombosis(pages 104 - 107)   a. How did you read this article? Read entire article Only skimmed the article Read only the abstract Read only the capsule summary I skipped the article   b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article? Excellent Great Good Mediocre Poor   c. Please rate the readability of this article: Great Good Fair Poor Very poor   d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice: Very useful Somewhat useful Not very useful Not applicable   e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is: Way too many A few too many About right Too few Way too few   f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:
3.	Article: Are the Uninsured Responsible for the Increase in Emergency Department Visits in the United States?(pages 108 - 115)   a. How did you read this article? Read entire article Only skimmed the article Read only the abstract Read only the capsule summary I skipped the article   b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article? Excellent Great Good Mediocre Poor   c. Please rate the readability of this article: Great Good Fair Poor Very poor   d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice: Very useful Somewhat useful Not very useful Not applicable   e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is: Way too many A few too many About right Too few Way too few   f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:
4.	Article: Forecasting Emergency Department Crowding: A Discrete Event Simulation(pages 116 - 125)   a. How did you read this article? Read entire article Only skimmed the article Read only the abstract Read only the capsule summary I skipped the article   b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article? Excellent Great Good Mediocre Poor   c. Please rate the readability of this article: Great Good Fair Poor Very poor   d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice: Very useful Somewhat useful Not very useful Not applicable   e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is: Way too many A few too many About right Too few Way too few   f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:
5.	Article: Systematic Review of Emergency Department Crowding: Causes, Effects, and Solutions(pages 126 - 136)   a. How did you read this article? Read entire article Only skimmed the article Read only the abstract Read only the capsule summary I skipped the article   b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article? Excellent Great Good Mediocre Poor   c. Please rate the readability of this article: Great Good Fair Poor Very poor   d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice: Very useful Somewhat useful Not very useful Not applicable   e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is: Way too many A few too many About right Too few Way too few   f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:
6.	Article: Characteristics of Women With Fetal Loss in Symptomatic First Trimester Pregnancies With Documented Fetal Cardiac Activity(pages 143 - 147)   a. How did you read this article? Read entire article Only skimmed the article Read only the abstract Read only the capsule summary I skipped the article   b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article? Excellent Great Good Mediocre Poor   c. Please rate the readability of this article: Great Good Fair Poor Very poor   d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice: Very useful Somewhat useful Not very useful Not applicable   e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is: Way too many A few too many About right Too few Way too few   f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:
7.	Article: Balloon Compression as Treatment for Refractory Vaginal Hemorrhage(pages 148 - 150)   a. How did you read this article? Read entire article Only skimmed the article Read only the abstract Read only the capsule summary I skipped the article Other   b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article? Excellent Great Good Mediocre Poor Other   c. Please rate the readability of this article: Great Good Fair Poor Very poor Other   d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice: Very useful Somewhat useful Not very useful Not applicable Other   e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is: Way too many A few too many About right Too few Way too few Other   f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:
8.	Article: Failure to Validate the San Francisco Syncope Rule in an Independent Emergency Department Population(pages 151 - 159)   a. How did you read this article? Read entire article Only skimmed the article Read only the abstract Read only the capsule summary I skipped the article Other   b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article? Excellent Great Good Mediocre Poor Other   c. Please rate the readability of this article: Great Good Fair Poor Very poor Other   d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice: Very useful Somewhat useful Not very useful Not applicable Other   e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is: Way too many A few too many About right Too few Way too few Other   f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:
9.	Article: Empirical Characteristics of Litigation Involving Tissue Plasminogen Activator and Ischemic Stroke(pages 160 - 164)   a. How did you read this article? Read entire article Only skimmed the article Read only the abstract Read only the capsule summary I skipped the article Other   b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article? Excellent Great Good Mediocre Poor Other   c. Please rate the readability of this article: Great Good Fair Poor Very poor Other   d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice: Very useful Somewhat useful Not very useful Not applicable Other   e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is: Way too many A few too many About right Too few Way too few Other   f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:   Contact the questionnaire administrator with any questions or problems.