Scroll down to find the article for which you would like to provide feedback.
1.	Article: Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Rapid Discharge of Low-Risk Patients With Potential Acute Coronary Syndromes(pages 295 - 304)   a. How did you read this article? Read entire article Only skimmed the article Read only the abstract Read only the capsule summary I skipped the article Other   b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article? Excellent Great Good Mediocre Poor Other   c. Please rate the readability of this article: Great Good Fair Poor Very poor Other   d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice: Very useful Somewhat useful Not very useful Not applicable Other   e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is: Way too many A few too many About right Too few Way too few Other   f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:
2.	Article: One-Year Medical Outcomes and Emergency Department Recidivism After Emergency Department Observation for Cocaine-Associated Chest Pain(pages 310- 320)   a. How did you read this article? Read entire article Only skimmed the article Read only the abstract Read only the capsule summary I skipped the article Other   b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article? Excellent Great Good Mediocre Poor Other   c. Please rate the readability of this article: Great Good Fair Poor Very poor Other   d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice: Very useful Somewhat useful Not very useful Not applicable Other   e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is: Way too many A few too many About right Too few Way too few Other   f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:
3.	Article: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Central Laboratory and Point-of-Care Cardiac Marker Testing Strategies: The Disposition Impacted by Serial Point of Care Markers in Acute Coronary Syndromes (DISPO-ACS) Trial(pages 321 - 328)   a. How did you read this article? Read entire article Only skimmed the article Read only the abstract Read only the capsule summary I skipped the article Other   b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article? Excellent Great Good Mediocre Poor Other   c. Please rate the readability of this article: Great Good Fair Poor Very poor Other   d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice: Very useful Somewhat useful Not very useful Not applicable Other   e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is: Way too many A few too many About right Too few Way too few Other   f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:
4.	Article: Clevidipine, an Intravenous Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blocker, Is Safe and Effective for the Treatment of Patients With Acute Severe Hypertension(pages 329 - 338)   a. How did you read this article? Read entire article Only skimmed the article Read only the abstract Read only the capsule summary I skipped the article Other   b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article? Excellent Great Good Mediocre Poor Other   c. Please rate the readability of this article: Great Good Fair Poor Very poor Other   d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice: Very useful Somewhat useful Not very useful Not applicable Other   e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is: Way too many A few too many About right Too few Way too few Other   f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:
5.	Article: The Random Dialing Survey as a Tool for Community Consultation for Research Involving the Emergency Medicine Exception From Informed Consent(pages 341 - 350)   a. How did you read this article? Read entire article Only skimmed the article Read only the abstract Read only the capsule summary I skipped the article Other   b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article? Excellent Great Good Mediocre Poor Other   c. Please rate the readability of this article: Great Good Fair Poor Very poor Other   d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice: Very useful Somewhat useful Not very useful Not applicable Other   e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is: Way too many A few too many About right Too few Way too few Other   f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:
6.	Staphylococcus aureus Community-Acquired Pneumonia During the 2006 to 2007 Influenza Season(pages 358 - 365)   a. How did you read this article? Read entire article Only skimmed the article Read only the abstract Read only the capsule summary I skipped the article Other   b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article? Excellent Great Good Mediocre Poor Other   c. Please rate the readability of this article: Great Good Fair Poor Very poor Other   d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice: Very useful Somewhat useful Not very useful Not applicable Other   e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is: Way too many A few too many About right Too few Way too few Other   f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:
7.	Article: Accuracy of Two Scores in the Diagnosis of Stroke Subtype in a Multicenter Cohort Study(pages 373 - 378)   a. How did you read this article? Read entire article Only skimmed the article Read only the abstract Read only the capsule summary I skipped the article Other   b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article? Excellent Great Good Mediocre Poor Other   c. Please rate the readability of this article: Great Good Fair Poor Very poor Other   d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice: Very useful Somewhat useful Not very useful Not applicable Other   e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is: Way too many A few too many About right Too few Way too few Other   f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:
8.	Article: A Randomized Trial of Diphenhydramine as Prophylaxis Against Metoclopramide-Induced Akathisia in Nauseated Emergency Department Patients(pages 379 - 385)TEST TEST   a. How did you read this article? Read entire article Only skimmed the article Read only the abstract Read only the capsule summary I skipped the article Other   b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article? Excellent Great Good Mediocre Poor Other   c. Please rate the readability of this article: Great Good Fair Poor Very poor Other   d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice: Very useful Somewhat useful Not very useful Not applicable Other   e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is: Way too many A few too many About right Too few Way too few Other   f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:   Contact the questionnaire administrator with any questions or problems.