Annals of Emergency Medicine Article Feedback Survey (Vol. 53, No. 5)
Scroll down to find the article for which you would like to provide feedback.
 
1. Article: Adding More Beds to the Emergency Department or Reducing Admitted Patient Boarding Times: Which Has a More Significant Impact on Emergency Department Congestion?
 
a. How did you read this article?
Read entire article
Only skimmed the article
Read only the abstract
Read only the capsule summary
I skipped the article
Other
 
b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article?
Excellent
Great
Good
Mediocre
Poor
Other
 
c. Please rate the readability of this article:
Great
Good
Fair
Poor
Very poor
Other
 
d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice:
Very useful
Somewhat useful
Not very useful
Not applicable
Other
 
e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is:
Way too many
A few too many
About right
Too few
Way too few
Other
 
f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:
 
 
2. Article: Comparisons of High versus Low Emergency Department Utilizers in Sickle Cell Disease (Original Research)
 
a. How did you read this article?
Read entire article
Only skimmed the article
Read only the abstract
Read only the capsule summary
I skipped the article
Other
 
b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article?
Excellent
Great
Good
Mediocre
Poor
Other
 
c. Please rate the readability of this article:
Great
Good
Fair
Poor
Very poor
Other
 
d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice:
Very useful
Somewhat useful
Not very useful
Not applicable
Other
 
e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is:
Way too many
A few too many
About right
Too few
Way too few
Other
 
f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:
 
 
3. Article: Delayed Administration of Antibiotics and Mortality in Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia (Original Research)
 
a. How did you read this article?
Read entire article
Only skimmed the article
Read only the abstract
Read only the capsule summary
I skipped the article
Other
 
b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article?
Excellent
Great
Good
Mediocre
Poor
Other
 
c. Please rate the readability of this article:
Great
Good
Fair
Poor
Very poor
Other
 
d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice:
Very useful
Somewhat useful
Not very useful
Not applicable
Other
 
e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is:
Way too many
A few too many
About right
Too few
Way too few
Other
 
f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:
 
 
4. Article: Decision Instrument for the Isolation of Pneumonia Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Tuberculosis Admitted Through US Emergency Departments
 
a. How did you read this article?
Read entire article
Only skimmed the article
Read only the abstract
Read only the capsule summary
I skipped the article
Other
 
b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article?
Excellent
Great
Good
Mediocre
Poor
Other
 
c. Please rate the readability of this article:
Great
Good
Fair
Poor
Very poor
Other
 
d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice:
Very useful
Somewhat useful
Not very useful
Not applicable
Other
 
e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is:
Way too many
A few too many
About right
Too few
Way too few
Other
 
f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:
 
 
5. Article: Assessing Clinical Reasoning in Pediatric Emergency Medicine: Validity Evidence for a Script Concordance Test
 
a. How did you read this article?
Read entire article
Only skimmed the article
Read only the abstract
Read only the capsule summary
I skipped the article
Other
 
b. How would you rank the overall quality of this article?
Excellent
Great
Good
Mediocre
Poor
Other
 
c. Please rate the readability of this article:
Great
Good
Fair
Poor
Very poor
Other
 
d. Please rate the usefulness of this article for your clinical practice:
Very useful
Somewhat useful
Not very useful
Not applicable
Other
 
e. Regarding the topic of this article, do you think the number of articles we publish on this topic is:
Way too many
A few too many
About right
Too few
Way too few
Other
 
f. Please feel free to make specific comments about this article:
 
 




Contact the questionnaire administrator with any questions or problems.