San Francisco Baykeeper v. Cargill Salt Division, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 5442

San Francisco Baykeeper v. Cargill Salt Division, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 5442

Because mere adjacency provided a basis for Clean Water Act coverage only when the relevant waterbody was a wetland, and no other reason for CWA coverage of the pond was supported by evidence or was properly before the appellate court, the appellate court it reversed the district court's summary judgment.
 
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of San Francisco Baykeeper v. Cargill Salt Division.
 
Non-subscribers can use lexisOne’s Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of San Francisco Baykeeper v. Cargill Salt Division.