Matter of Thakker, 28 I&N Dec. 843 (BIA 2024) (1) The assumption in Matter of Jurado that a retail theft offense involves an intent to permanently deprive a victim of their property is inconsistent...
USCIS, Sept. 19, 2024 "We have received enough petitions to reach the congressionally mandated cap on H-2B visas for temporary nonagricultural workers for the first half of fiscal year 2025. Sept...
Lopez Orellana v. Garland "The question presented here is whether the Louisiana accessory-after-the-fact statute, LA.REV. STAT. § 14:25, is a categorical match for the generic federal offense...
USCIS, Sept. 18, 2024 "Effective Sept. 10, 2024, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services automatically extended the validity of Permanent Resident Cards (also known as Green Cards) to 36 months...
Singh v. Garland "Petitioner Varinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, seeks rescission of a removal order entered in absentia. We previously granted Singh’s petition because the government...
"In sum, we find that the DHS has failed to meet its burden of proving that the respondent is removable based on the charges listed in the Notice to Appear and 1-261, and disagree with the Immigration Judge's finding that the respondent is removable as charged under sections 237 (a )(2)( C) and 237 (a)(2)(A ) (iii) of the Act. Therefore, we will terminate the respondent's removal proceedings." - Matter of X-, June 18, 2012.
Hats off to Maria McIntyre!