Ninth Circuit's Decision in Bratz Doll Dispute: Mattel, Inc. v. MGA Entm't, Inc., 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 29187 (9th Cir. Cal. Filed, July 22, 2010)

Ninth Circuit's Decision in Bratz Doll Dispute: Mattel, Inc. v. MGA Entm't, Inc., 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 29187 (9th Cir. Cal. Filed, July 22, 2010)

2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 29187

MATTEL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant-counter-claimant-Appellee, v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; MGA ENTERTAINMENT (HK) LIMITED, a Hong Kong Special Administrative Region business entity; ISAAC LARIAN, an individual, Counter-defendants-Appellants, CARTER BRYANT, an individual, Plaintiff-counter-defendant, CARLOS GUSTAVO MACHADO GOMEZ, an individual; MGAE DE MEXICO, S.R.L. DE C.V., a Mexico business entity, Counter-defendants, ANNE WANG, Third-party-defendant, OMNI 808 INVESTORS LLC, Movant. CARTER BRYANT, an individual, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellee, MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; MGA ENTERTAINMENT (HK) LIMITED, a Hong Kong Special Administrative Region business entity; ISAAC LARIAN, an individual, Counter-defendants-Appellees, MATTEL, INC., a Delaware corporation, OPINION Defendant-counter-claimant-Appellant, CARLOS GUSTAVO MACHADO GOMEZ, an individual; MGAE DE MEXICO, S.R.L. DE C.V., a Mexico business entity, Counter-defendants.

No. 09-55673, No. 09-55812

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 29187

December 9, 2009, Argued and Submitted, Pasadena, California

July 22, 2010, Filed

 

PRIOR HISTORY:

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. D.C. No. 2:04-cv-09049-SGL-RNB. D.C. No. 2:04-cv-09049-SGL-RNB. Stephen G. Larson, District Judge, Presiding.

Bryant v. Mattel, Inc., 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107208 (C.D. Cal., Dec. 3, 2008)

 

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Mattel, Inc. v. MGA Entm't, Inc., 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 29187 (9th Cir. Cal. Filed, July 22, 2010)

Non-subscribers can use lexisOne's Free Case Law search to view the free, un-enhanced version of Mattel, Inc. v. MGA Entm't, Inc., 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 29187 (9th Cir. Cal. Filed, July 22, 2010)