The U.S. Supreme Court has granted certiorari in WildTangent, Inc. v. Ultramercial, LLC, et al. [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers], and has instructed the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to revisit its WildTangent decision in light of the Court's holding in Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers]. The issue in the WildTangent case is whether a process claim that specifies certain steps performed "over the Internet" or "at an Internet website" can constitute statutory subject matter under 35 U.S.C. 101.
Earlier this year, the Court similarly remanded Association for Molecular Pathology et al. v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., et al. [enhanced version available to lexis.com subscribers] in light of the Mayo decision.
For further background, please see our earlier alerts regarding the Mayo and Myriad cases. Fitch Even attorneys are monitoring these cases closely and will report back as further developments occur.
© Copyright 2006-2012 Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery® All Rights Reserved
Lexis.com subscribers can explore/search Patent Law resources on Lexis.com or access any of these Mathew Bender Patent Law publications:
Non-subscribers can purchase Patent Law
treatises/resources and Mathew Bender publications from the LexisNexis Bookstore
For more information about LexisNexis products and
solutions connect with us through our corporate