Staub v. Proctor Hosp., 560 F.3d 647 (7th Cir. Ill., 2009)

Staub v. Proctor Hosp., 560 F.3d 647 (7th Cir. Ill., 2009)

LexisNexis Overview: Judgment in favor of a discharged employee under USERRA was reversed because there was insufficient evidence to support a verdict against the employer under the "cat's paw" theory. Based on the evidence, a reasonable jury could not have concluded that the employee was fired because he was a member of the military.

Counsel: For VINCENT E. STAUB, Plaintiff - Appellee: Julie L. Galassi, Attorney, HASSELBERG, ROCK, BELL & KUPPLER, Peoria, IL.

For PROCTOR HOSPITAL, an Illinois Corporation, Defendant - Appellant: Roy G. Davis, Attorney, DAVIS & CAMPBELL, Peoria, IL.

Judges: Before MANION, EVANS, and TINDER, Circuit Judges.

Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Staub v. Proctor Hosp

Non-subscribers can view the free, unenhanced version of Staub v. Proctor Hosp on lexisONE's Free Case Law

 

  • Tags: