LexisNexis Overview: Judgment
in favor of a discharged employee under USERRA was reversed because there was
insufficient evidence to support a verdict against the employer under the
"cat's paw" theory. Based on the evidence, a reasonable jury could
not have concluded that the employee was fired because he was a member of the
Counsel: For VINCENT E.
STAUB, Plaintiff - Appellee: Julie L. Galassi, Attorney, HASSELBERG, ROCK, BELL
& KUPPLER, Peoria, IL.
For PROCTOR HOSPITAL, an
Illinois Corporation, Defendant - Appellant: Roy G. Davis, Attorney, DAVIS
& CAMPBELL, Peoria, IL.
Judges: Before MANION,
EVANS, and TINDER, Circuit Judges.
Lexis.com subscribers can view the enhanced version of Staub v. Proctor Hosp
Non-subscribers can view the free, unenhanced version of Staub v. Proctor Hosp on lexisONE's Free Case Law