Conceiving of the End of Class Arbitration: Supreme Court's Action in AT&T Mobility

By John E. Porter and Ronald M. Oster

Introduction : On April 27, 2011, in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion (2011)___ U.S. ___, 131 S.Ct. 1740, 179 L.Ed.2d 742, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 3367, a sharply divided U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempted California's judicially created Discover Bank rule, which found waivers of class arbitration in most consumer contracts to be unconscionable and therefore unenforceable. Specifically, the Supreme Court held that the FAA prohibits states from conditioning the enforceability of certain arbitration agreements on the availability of class wide arbitration procedures.

The AT&T Mobility decision was foreshadowed by the Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp. (2010) 599 U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 1758, 176 L.Ed.2d 605, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 3672, in which the Court held that when an arbitration agreement is silent on the question of whether class action proceedings are authorized, the parties' consent to class arbitration may not be inferred absent evidence of the parties' intent or a governing rule of law authorizing that inference. Taken together, Stolt-Nielsen and AT&T Mobility may lead to the effective demise of class arbitrations unless those decisions are abrogated by federal legislation or subsequent Supreme Court decisions.

 

Access the full version of "Conceiving of the End of Class Arbitration: Supreme Court's Action in AT&T Mobility " with your lexis.com ID

If you do not have a lexis.com ID, you can purchase the Emerging Issues Analysis content on the LexisNexis Store

For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR(S):
John Porter is a partner with Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP in its Tokyo office. In his 27 years of practice, Mr. Porter has specialized in representing Asian companies in intellectual property, commercial, and technology-related disputes. Mr. Porter graduated from Stanford Law School in 1983. Mr. Porter was a member of the Stanford Law School Board of Visitors from 1990 to 1994 and from 2003 to 2005. Since October 2007, Mr. Porter has served on the California Judicial Council's Advisory Committee on Civil Jury Instructions.

Ronald Oster is a partner with Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP in its Los Angeles office. He is a former Chair of the firm's Litigation Department, and for over 30 years his practice has emphasized complex business trials and appeals. He is a member of the LexisNexis California Advisory Board. Mr. Oster graduated from Stanford Law School in 1973. He is married to Diana Wheatley, Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court.