I have a confession to make.
I'm an information junkie. All my life
I've been a voracious consumer of books, magazines and newspapers.
From burying my nose in novels as a child,
through reading 3-4 books a week when commuting as a lawyer, to teaching myself
to speed-read early in my legal career to keep on top of fast moving professional
development, books have never been far away.
Indeed I wrote about how
reading more widely can help a lawyer become more rounded and get a wider perspective
that can enhance their thinking and advice (and I stand by that idea!).
So what's the problem?
Well, the quantity, quality and ease
of access to information is so high these days, that reading can take up a
disproportionate amount of time.
It's possible to spend so much time reading,
that experiencing life and reflecting on it can take a back seat.
I took some time to reflect on this challenge
on a recent holiday, and realised that I was bombarding myself with information
pretty much from the moment I open my eyes. Does some or any of this sound familiar...
Aside from the enjoyment I got from reading
(an important factor not to gloss over in this discussion), it was apparent that
my mind was whirring constantly from the moment the alarm went at 5am. My sense
was that while this definitely had benefits in terms of the sheer amount of knowledge
I was accumulating (much of which has been very useful), it was also draining a
lot of mental energy and limiting the headspace I had for thinking and reflecting,
and on balance the negatives were beginning to outweigh the positives.
As the Tao Te Ching
says (verse 48) "learning is daily accumulating, the Way is daily diminishing"
(and yes I realise that's a quote from a book!).
Sometimes less is more.
So I decided to do an experiment - I'd
go on an information diet.
The first thing I did was cut out reading
a daily newspaper. I've read a newspaper pretty much every day for the last twenty
years. Give or take a few minutes, it takes me about 30 minutes to read the whole
thing in my very methodical way. News headlines, sport, UK news, overseas news,
business news, features and culture. Bish bash bosh.
Now giving this up might seem a small
step, but psychologically I wondered what the effect would be - would it hamper
my ability to hold conversations in the office? What about at social events? Would
I go to meetings and find I didn't know what people were talking about? Would this
damage my personal competitive advantage? Would I become (perish the thought) less
The reality - important news found
me. I didn't have a complete news black out - quick checks on the BBC mobile
news, trends from Twitter, and of
course conversations have so far (four months and counting) brought me all the news
I seem to need.
What I didn't anticipate is that where
I have needed to find out about something (and this has been very rare), simply
asking the person who's raised the issue to tell me what's happened had led to some
rich conversations and elicited opinions I might not have got if I'd already known
The other thing I noticed, is that when
I pick up a newspaper, I now see how much news there is that really has no impact
on my life (in any capacity), which is generally depressing, but which I would
have consumed anyway in my pre-information diet days.
On a similar note, a former journalist
I met with last week mentioned that he was continually frustrated by his inability
to block out which contestants are currently appearing on Celebrity Big Brother
because despite his total lack of interest in the subject, it seeps into his consciousness
through the media.
So far so good. I'd reclaimed three and
a half hours of time per week (182 hours a year sounds more impressive!).
Assuming I used that time wisely, that was a real productivity boost.
The next step was to stop reading other
So for the last three and a half months,
the only book I've looked at (which I mentioned in my post The Tao of Law Firm Strategy)
has been the Tao Te Ching - the classic Chinese text which is best described as
a cross between philosophy and poetry. Read for five minutes, ponder for an hour.
So for all intents and purposes, my reading
has gone from say 3 hours a day, to zero. That's over 1,000 hours a year. Or one
and a half months.
Pretty drastic? Maybe.
Permanent? Don't know.
One of the important points (in my eyes
anyway) is that not only have I reduced the information I take in, but I've chosen
not to replace that activity with another. It's just white space and I definitely appreciate
the extra time I now have to think things through (work and personal) and also just
There are times when less is definitely
It's also made me much more conscious
of where I choose to focus - Davenport wrote a great book called The Attention
Economy about the value of attention (related article at Brainpickings if you're interested),
and having some extra time and space to allow you to step back and re-prioritise
is surely a good thing.
So what's the reading end-game for me?
Well, I think I will welcome books back
into my life at some point, although I feel no rush to do it right now. When I do
I think I'll be more selective about what I read - to offer me greater benefit that
the space I've freed up, it's going to have to be quite a book!
So for busy lawyers, while I can't free
you from the tyranny
of the timesheets (the market will do that in time...), by limiting the amount
of information you take in outside the office, you might find yourself more productive.
Just don't spend the time you're freed
up watching television. Please!
Read more from The
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with
us through our corporate site.