Wednesday, May 16, 2012
To view the full text of these opinions, please visit:http://email.lexisnexismail.com/cgi-bin8/DM/t/hpCb0Ggrcd0FuK0k5C0EOor Lexis subscribers may use the links below to access the cases on Lexis.com
Division Two of the Court of Appeals filed 1 new published opinion on Wednesday, May 16, 2012:City of Puyallup v. Hogan No. 41017-6 (May 16, 2012)2012 Wash. App. LEXIS 1157Areas: BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL LAWGOVERNMENT RELATIONS AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAWPROPERTY AND LAND USE LAWBrief: The city condemned a small portion of a shopping center for a road construction project that will significantly reduce access to the center. After a jury awarded over $5,150,000 in just compensation for the taking, the center’s anchor tenant petitioned the trial court for apportionment of that award. The trial court awarded $918,129.18 to the tenant in a bench apportionment trial. The Court of Appeals affirms the trial court’s denial of the owner’s motion for summary judgment, affirms the court on apportionment and prejudgment interest, and reverses the court’s order suspending postjudgment interest.
Tell a Friend About Washington Heads Up -Pass along this HeadsUp Alert to your colleagues. They can register online to receive the next headsup directly from LexisNexis.
To stop receiving this communication, use this link.
For questions or comments, please write: HeadsUp@lexisnexis.com HeadsUp is brought to you by LexisNexis®
Privacy Copyright © 2006 LexisNexis®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.LexisNexis, 9443 Springboro Pike, Miamisburg, Ohio 45342
For more information about LexisNexis products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site.