1st Circuit: $21 Million Design Defect Verdict For Generic Drug Injury Not Preempted

BOSTON - (Mealey's) A panel of the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on May 2 affirmed a $21 million generic drug injury verdict, finding that a 2011 Supreme Court ruling about generic drug injury claims does not preempt design defect claims ( Karen L. Bartlett v. Mutual Pharmaceutical Company...

U.S. Supreme Court Will Rule On Preemption Of Generic Drug Design Defect Claim

WASHINGTON, D.C. - (Mealey's) The U.S. Supreme Court on Nov. 30 said it will review a First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruling that a defective design claim involving a generic drug is not preempted by federal law, placing in jeopardy a $21 million verdict for a New Hampshire woman who suffered...

U.S. High Court Allows Solicitor General To Argue For Drug Design Defect Preemption

WASHINGTON, D.C. - (Mealey's) The U.S. solicitor general will be allowed to argue March 19 that design defect claims involving generic drugs are preempted by federal law, the U.S. Supreme Court decided March 4 in granting the federal government's motion to participate in oral arguments ( Mutual...

Supreme Court Questions If New Hampshire Law Escapes Preemption Of Drug Claims

WASHINGTON, D.C. - (Mealey's) Several U.S. Supreme Court justices on March 19 questioned whether New Hampshire law allows a design defect claim against a generic drug manufacturer that escapes preemption under the high court's two drug preemption rulings ( Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc....