Federal Judge: Potential For Coverage Exists Under Policy's Definition Of 'Injury'

SAN FRANCISCO - A former employee's allegations against his employer insured raise the potential for coverage under an insurance policy's definition of "injury" that includes "common law claims for invasion of the right of privacy," a California federal judge ruled March 20, denying the insurer's motion for summary judgment in part (Twin Star Ventures Inc., et al. v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co.,  No. 10-04284, N.D. Calif.; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37628).

Lexis.com subscribers may access Insurance resources on Lexis.com. Mealey's subscribers may view Mealey's Litigation Report: Insurance, or search Mealey's Litigation Reports by Practice Area.

Additional Insurance Law resources and Emerging Issues Analysis are available in the LexisNexis Store.

Access this news story on lexis.com®