Requested Documents Are Not Relevant To Choice-Of-Law Analysis, Federal Judge Says

Requested Documents Are Not Relevant To Choice-Of-Law Analysis, Federal Judge Says

INDIANAPOLIS - An Indiana federal judge on June 17 overruled an insured's objections to a magistrate judge's discovery ruling after determining that the documents sought by the insured were not relevant to the choice-of-law analysis in an environmental contamination coverage dispute (Visteon Corp. et al. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. et al., No. 11-200, S.D. Ind.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84628).

Access this news story on lexis.com®