SAN DIEGO - A California appeals panel on July 19 reversed and remanded a lower court's ruling in favor of an insurer, finding that an underlying cross-complaint against the insured suggests a claim that is potentially covered by the policy's advertising injury provision (TetraVue Inc. et al. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co., No. D061002, Calif. App., 4th Dist., Div. 1; 2013 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 5074).