Web Designer's Disparaging Ad Violated Cybersquatting Consent Order, Judge Rules

HARRISONBURG, Va. - A website designer violated the nondisparagement clause of a consent injunction by posting an ad that was intended to damage the reputation of his former client, a Virginia federal judge ruled Nov. 12, granting in part the plaintiff's motion to enforce judgment and issuing an award of attorney fees (Allstar Lodging Inc. v. William Rookard, et al., No. 5:13-cv-00053, W.D. Va.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160845).

Access this news story on lexis.com®