Pennsylvania Appeals Panel Affirms Exclusion Of Expert In Chemical Exposure Suit

HARRISBURG - A unanimous Pennsylvania Superior Court panel issued an opinion Dec. 6 affirming summary judgment against the widow of a contractor employee who alleges that her late husband contracted cancer as a result of chemical exposure at a Rohm & Haas Co. facility in suburban Philadelphia; the testimony of her causation expert was properly excluded under Pennsylvania Rule of Evidence 702, according to the panel (Anne Snizavich v. Rohm & Haas Co., No. 1383 EDA 2012, Pa. Super.).

Access this news story on®