Mealey's Litigation Procedure - Expert Testimony Admissible Despite Factual Inconsistency, 6th Circuit Panel Rules

Mealey's Litigation Procedure - Expert Testimony Admissible Despite Factual Inconsistency, 6th Circuit Panel Rules

CINCINNATI - Inconsistency between a plaintiff expert's testimony and the recollection of the plaintiff about the details of his accidental shooting is an insufficient basis to exclude the expert's testimony, the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled in a 2-1 opinion on July 29 (Mark D. Lee v. Smith & Wesson Corp., No. 13-3597, 6th Cir.).

Find full version on lexis Advance®
Access this news story on lexis.com®