RICHMOND, Va. - After finding that due to a group of class claimants' failure to move for judgment before a jury rendered a verdict in favor of a bank and real estate firm on their claims for violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Aug. 5 found that a trial court did not err when it refused to grant them a new trial (Denise Minter, et al. v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A., No. 13-2131, 4th Cir.; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 15041).