LexisNexis® Legal Newsroom
Mealey's Labor & Employment - 7th Circuit Rejects Preliminary Injunction In ACA Opt-Out Challenge

CHICAGO - Notre Dame is not entitled to a preliminary injunction while it challenges the opt-out provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA)'s contraceptive mandate, a divided Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held May 19 (University of Notre Dame v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al., No. 13-3853, 7th Cir.).

Mealey's Insurance - 7th Circuit Rejects Preliminary Injunction In ACA Opt-Out Challenge

CHICAGO - Notre Dame is not entitled to a preliminary injunction while it challenges the opt-out provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA)'s contraceptive mandate, a divided Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held May 19 (University of Notre Dame v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al., No. 13-3853, 7th Cir.).

Mealey's Health Law - 7th Circuit Rejects Preliminary Injunction In ACA Opt-Out Challenge

CHICAGO - Notre Dame is not entitled to a preliminary injunction while it challenges the opt-out provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA)'s contraceptive mandate, a divided Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held May 19 (University of Notre Dame v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al., No. 13-3853, 7th Cir.).

Mealey's Litigation Procedure - Restaurant Employees Allege Interference Under ERISA Related To ACA Compliance

NEW YORK - Nationwide restaurant/entertainment chain Dave & Buster's Inc. violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act by reducing the hours of its work force in 2013 in order to avoid the costs associated with providing health insurance to its full-time employees in compliance with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), an employee alleges in a class action complaint filed May 8 in federal court in New York (Maria De Lourdes Parra Marin v. Dave & Buster's, Inc., et al., No. 15 CV 3608, S.D. N.Y.).

Mealey's Health Law - Restaurant Employees Allege Interference Under ERISA Related To ACA Compliance

NEW YORK - Nationwide restaurant/entertainment chain Dave & Buster's Inc. violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act by reducing the hours of its work force in 2013 in order to avoid the costs associated with providing health insurance to its full-time employees in compliance with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), an employee alleges in a class action complaint filed May 8 in federal court in New York (Maria De Lourdes Parra Marin v. Dave & Buster's, Inc., et al., No. 15 CV 3608, S.D. N.Y.).

Mealey's Labor & Employment - Restaurant Employees Allege Interference Under ERISA Related To ACA Compliance

NEW YORK - Nationwide restaurant/entertainment chain Dave & Buster's Inc. violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act by reducing the hours of its work force in 2013 in order to avoid the costs associated with providing health insurance to its full-time employees in compliance with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), an employee alleges in a class action complaint filed May 8 in federal court in New York (Maria De Lourdes Parra Marin v. Dave & Buster's, Inc., et al., No. 15 CV 3608, S.D. N.Y.).

Mealey's Labor & Employment - Top Court Vacates ACA Birth Control Ruling, Remands Case

WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Supreme Court on April 27 granted two Catholic groups' petition for certiorari and vacated a Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruling that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's contraceptive mandate did not substantially burden religious beliefs. The court remanded the case for further consideration in light of Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores Inc. (573 U.S. __ [2014]) (Michigan Catholic Conference, et al. v. Burwell, Sec. of H&HS, et al., No 14-701, U.S. Sup.).

Mealey's Insurance - Top Court Vacates ACA Birth Control Ruling, Remands Case

WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Supreme Court on April 27 granted two Catholic groups' petition for certiorari and vacated a Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruling that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's contraceptive mandate did not substantially burden religious beliefs. The court remanded the case for further consideration in light of Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores Inc. (573 U.S. __ [2014]) (Michigan Catholic Conference, et al. v. Burwell, Sec. of H&HS, et al., No 14-701, U.S. Sup.).

Mealey's Health Law - Top Court Vacates ACA Birth Control Ruling, Remands Case

WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Supreme Court on April 27 granted two Catholic groups' petition for certiorari and vacated a Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruling that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's contraceptive mandate did not substantially burden religious beliefs. The court remanded the case for further consideration in light of Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores Inc. (573 U.S. __ [2014]) (Michigan Catholic Conference, et al. v. Burwell, Sec. of H&HS, et al., No 14-701, U.S. Sup.).

Mealey's Health Law - Montana House Passes ACA Medicaid Expansion Legislation

HELENA, Mont. - Montana Legislature on April 9 appeared to ready to enact legislation expanding Medicaid under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) after a newly introduced bill survived four failed motions for a second reading and two motions to re-refer the legislation to the House Appropriations.

Mealey's Insurance - Missouri Law Regulating ACA Advisers Preempted, 8th Circuit Affirms

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. - A judge properly enjoined portions of a Missouri law governing the conduct of advisers employed to help people navigate the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) exchange, an Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel held April 10 in partially affirming (St. Louis Effort for Aids, et al. v. John Huff, director of the Missouri Department of Insurance, Financial Institutions and Professional Registration, No. 14-1520, 8th Cir.).

Mealey's Health Law - Missouri Law Regulating ACA Advisers Preempted, 8th Circuit Affirms

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. - A judge properly enjoined portions of a Missouri law governing the conduct of advisers employed to help people navigate the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) exchange, an Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel held April 10 in partially affirming (St. Louis Effort for Aids, et al. v. John Huff, director of the Missouri Department of Insurance, Financial Institutions and Professional Registration, No. 14-1520, 8th Cir.).

Mealey's Insurance - Judge: Statute Precludes Challenge To Post-ACA Reimbursement Calculation

WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Medicare statute precludes a hospital's challenge to reimbursement calculations made under the amended rules of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), a federal judge in the District of Columbia held March 31 (Florida Health Sciences Center Inc., d/b/a Tampa General Hospital v. Secretary U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, No. 14-0791, D. D.C.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42650).

Mealey's Health Law - Judge: Statute Precludes Challenge To Post-ACA Reimbursement Calculation

WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Medicare statute precludes a hospital's challenge to reimbursement calculations made under the amended rules of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), a federal judge in the District of Columbia held March 31 (Florida Health Sciences Center Inc., d/b/a Tampa General Hospital v. Secretary U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, No. 14-0791, D. D.C.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42650).

Mealey's Insurance - Government: Representatives In ACA Funding Challenge Lack Standing

WASHINGTON, D.C. - A federal judge should ignore "alarmist" rhetoric and instead find that House of Representatives members lack standing to challenge how the government spends Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) funds, the government argues in a March 31 brief (United States House of Representatives v. Sylvia Mathews Burwell, et al., No. 14-1967, D. D.C.).

Mealey's Health Law - Government: Representatives In ACA Funding Challenge Lack Standing

WASHINGTON, D.C. - A federal judge should ignore "alarmist" rhetoric and instead find that House of Representatives members lack standing to challenge how the government spends Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) funds, the government argues in a March 31 brief (United States House of Representatives v. Sylvia Mathews Burwell, et al., No. 14-1967, D. D.C.).

Mealey's Labor & Employment - Supreme Court Rejects ACA Privacy Violations Challenge

WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Supreme Court on March 30 declined a challenge to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) alleging that the individual mandate impermissibly required disclosure of confidential personal information (Nick Coons, et al. v. Jacob L. Lew, et al., No. 14-525, U.S. Sup.).

Mealey's Insurance - Supreme Court Rejects ACA Privacy Violations Challenge

WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Supreme Court on March 30 declined a challenge to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) alleging that the individual mandate impermissibly required disclosure of confidential personal information (Nick Coons, et al. v. Jacob L. Lew, et al., No. 14-525, U.S. Sup.).

Mealey's Health Law - Supreme Court Rejects ACA Privacy Violations Challenge

WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Supreme Court on March 30 declined a challenge to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) alleging that the individual mandate impermissibly required disclosure of confidential personal information (Nick Coons, et al. v. Jacob L. Lew, et al., No. 14-525, U.S. Sup.).

Mealey's Insurance - Government Tells Appeals Court Man Lacks Injury From ACA, Means Of Redress

WASHINGTON, D.C. - An elected official cannot demonstrate injury from the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA)'s transitional policy allowing states to decide whether to impose minimum insurance requirements, and his establishment clause claims would not remedy any alleged injury, the government told the District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on March 20 (Jeffrey Cutler v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, et al., No. 14-5183, D.C. Cir.).

Mealey's Health Law - Government Tells Appeals Court Man Lacks Injury From ACA, Means Of Redress

WASHINGTON, D.C. - An elected official cannot demonstrate injury from the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA)'s transitional policy allowing states to decide whether to impose minimum insurance requirements, and his establishment clause claims would not remedy any alleged injury, the government told the District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on March 20 (Jeffrey Cutler v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, et al., No. 14-5183, D.C. Cir.).

Mealey's Labor & Employment - Government Asks Judge To Dismiss Indian Tribe's ACA Employer Mandate Challenge

CHEYENNE, Wyo. - An Indian tribe waived its objections to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA)'s large employer mandate by not raising them during the rulemaking process, and its action runs afoul of the Anti-Injunction Act's (AIA) bar on tax challenges taxes, the government told a federal judge on March 19 (Northern Arapaho Tribe, et al. v. Sylvia Burwell, et al., No. 14-247, D. Wyo.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30480).

Mealey's Insurance - Government Asks Judge To Dismiss Indian Tribe's ACA Employer Mandate Challenge

CHEYENNE, Wyo. - An Indian tribe waived its objections to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA)'s large employer mandate by not raising them during the rulemaking process, and its action runs afoul of the Anti-Injunction Act's (AIA) bar on tax challenges taxes, the government told a federal judge on March 19 (Northern Arapaho Tribe, et al. v. Sylvia Burwell, et al., No. 14-247, D. Wyo.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30480).

Mealey's Health Law - Government Asks Judge To Dismiss Indian Tribe's ACA Employer Mandate Challenge

CHEYENNE, Wyo. - An Indian tribe waived its objections to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA)'s large employer mandate by not raising them during the rulemaking process, and its action runs afoul of the Anti-Injunction Act's (AIA) bar on tax challenges taxes, the government told a federal judge on March 19 (Northern Arapaho Tribe, et al. v. Sylvia Burwell, et al., No. 14-247, D. Wyo.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30480).

Mealey's Labor & Employment - ACA Creates Singular Standard For Discrimination Cases, Federal Judge Says

MINNEAPOLIS - A transgendered individual may proceed with a Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) Section 1557 discrimination case because the law creates a singular standard regardless of protected class status, a federal judge in Minnesota held March 16 (Jakob Tiarnan Rumble v. Fairview Health Services d/b/a/ Fairview Southdale Hospital and Emergency Physicians P.A., No. 14-2037, D. Minn.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31591).