PHILADELPHIA - A Pennsylvania federal judge on June 17 approved a $1.2 billion settlement between Cephalon Inc. and the Federal Trade Commission in an antitrust battle accusing the company of engineering reverse payments with generic-drug makers made in connection with the patented prescription sleep-disorder drug Provigil (Federal Trade Commission v. Cephalon Inc., No. 08-2141, E.D. Pa.).
This is a test - June 20 2015
LOS ANGELES - A California federal judge on June 15 denied in part a motion by Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc. to dismiss a putative class action by former employees related to a 2014 data breach, finding that the plaintiffs had standing to sue and that they sufficiently alleged negligence and unfair competition claims (Michael Corona, et al. v. Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc., No. 2:14-cv-09600, C.D. Calif.).
LOS ANGELES - A California appeals court in a June 12 unpublished opinion affirmed an order denying a petition to compel arbitration in a suit accusing a grocery store chain of breaching its contract and violating, among other things, the state's unfair competition law (UCL) by ending its relationship with the plaintiff pretzel company and entering into a contract with the company that manufactured the plaintiff's pretzels for the store (Maxim Marketing Corp. v. Trader Joe's Co., No. B258308, Calif. App., 2nd Dist., Div. 3; 2015 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 4095).
SAN JOSE, Calif. - In a motion seeking preliminary approval of a settlement, the representatives of a putative class LinkedIn Corp. users told a California federal judge on June 11 that the professionally oriented social network operator had agreed to pay $13 million to settle their unfair competition and publicity rights claims against it (Paul Perkins, et al. v. LinkedIn Corp., No. 5:13-cv-04303, N.D. Calif.).
FRESNO, Calif. - A federal judge in California on June 10 declined to dismiss a state unfair competition claim (UCL) and an unjust enrichment claim brought under Utah law from a class action lawsuit accusing a homebuilder of instituting an illegal loan program that induced the placement of borrowers into its loan program, which had less favorable terms than they would have otherwise received (Luis Cabrales v. Castle & Cook Mortgage, No. 14-1138, E.D. Calif.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76636).
LOS ANGELES - A federal judge in California on June 10 allowed three claims brought under the state's unfair competition law (UCL) to continue in a dispute over the dissolving of a 7-Eleven franchise but dismissed claims for conversion, negligent interference and racial discrimination (Dallas and Lashmi Inc., et al. v. 7-Eleven Inc., No. 15-2044, C.D. Calif.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75348).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. and Lorillard Tobacco Co. may transfer several of their cigarette brands to British tobacco company Imperial Tobacco Group (ITG), a federal judge in the District of Columbia held June 8 (United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc., et al., No. 99-2496, D. D.C.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73464).
FRESNO, Calif. - A federal judge in California on June 5 declined to dismiss a class action lawsuit accusing an employer of violating wage and labor laws and the state's unfair competition law (UCL) by allegedly failing to pay employees for non-piecework completed (Jaime Perez, et al. v. Sun Pacific Farming Cooperative Inc., No. 15-259, E.D. Calif.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73986).
SAN FRANCISCO - A federal judge in California on June 5 declined to dismiss a class action lawsuit accusing Pepsico Inc. of violating state laws, including the unfair competition law (UCL), by misleading the public about the levels of the harmful and carcinogenic chemical called 4-Methylimidazole (4-Mel) contained in its Pepsi beverages (Stacy Sciortino, et al. v. Pepsico Inc., Nos. 14-478, 14-713, 14-1099, 14-1105, 14-1192, 14-1193, 14-1316, 14-1316, N.D. Calif.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73336).
SAN JOSE, Calif. - A federal judge in California on June 5 dismissed a state unfair competition law (UCL) claim from a dispute over whether an enterprise mobility management (EMM) solutions provider disseminated marketing materials disparaging the quality of the plaintiff's mobile data and device management technologies but allowed claims brought under the Lanham Act to continue (Good Technology Corp., et al. v. MobileIron Inc., No. 12-5826, N.D. Calif.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73271).
SAN FRANCISCO - A federal judge in California on May 27 granted plaintiffs' two motions for partial summary judgment in their class action suit accusing a manufacturer of cosmetic products of improperly labeling its products as organic in violation of the state's unfair competition law (UCL), finding that California Organic Products Act (COPA) violations are "predicate unlawful acts" under the UCL and that representations on COPA-violating products are per se "material" under the UCL, that such representations are per se deceptive under the UCL's fraud prong and that material misrepresentations create a "presumption of classwide reliance" under the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) (Rosminah Brown, et al. v. The Hain Celestial Group Inc., No. 11-3082, N.D. Calif.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67912).
LOS ANGELES - A federal judge in California on May 27 dismissed claims, including one brought under the state's unfair competition law (UCL), accusing the manufacturer of skin care products of falsely advertising its products anti-aging benefits (Geri Marshall v. PH Beauty Labs Inc., No. 15-2101, C.D. Calif.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68636).
SAN JOSE, Calif. - Finding no secondary meaning in a psychologist's name, a California appeals panel on May 27 affirmed a trial court's dismissal of her trademark claims against Google Inc. and Yahoo Inc., also affirming the lower court's discovery rulings and denial of a motion to file an amended complaint (Carla Ison v. Google Inc., et al., No. H039439, Calif. App., 6th Dist.; 2015 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 3667).
CAMDEN, N.J. - An amended class complaint alleging that Riddell Inc. falsely markets its Revolution-brand football helmet as safer than others addresses deficiencies that led a federal judge in New Jersey to dismiss it without prejudice, class plaintiff Normal Thiel argues in a May 22 memorandum opposing Riddell's motion to dismiss (In re Riddell Concussion Reduction Litigation, No. 13-7585, D. N.J.).
PHILADELPHIA - On the eve of a planned June 1 trial, the Federal Trade Commission and Cephalon Inc. announced May 28 a $1.2 billion settlement in their long-running antitrust battle over reverse payments made in connection with the patented prescription sleep-disorder drug Provigil (Federal Trade Commission v. Cephalon Inc., No. 08-2141, E.D. Pa.).
WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Federal Trade Commission on May 26 accepted the offer of Reynolds American Inc. to sell four of its brands to British cigarette manufacturer Imperial Tobacco Group to settle charges that its proposed merger with Lorillard Inc. would likely be anti-competitive (In the Matter of Reynolds American Inc. and Lorillard Inc., No. 141-0168, U.S. FTC).
OAKLAND, Calif. - A California federal judge on May 22 granted a bank's motion to dismiss a wrongful foreclosure case against it, finding that a borrower's claims for violation of the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and California's unfair competition law (UCL) were barred by res judicata (Arketha Munir v. The Bank of New York Mellon as Trustee, No. 14-cv-05073, N.D. Calif.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67293).
OAKLAND, Calif. - A federal judge in California on May 15 declined to amend a judgment dismissing with prejudice claims, including one for violation of the state's unfair competition law (UCL), in a class action lawsuit alleging that a manufacturer of "flushable" wipes misled consumers in advertising the product because they are not really flushable, saying the plaintiff failed to present any newly discovered evidence or show that the dismissal was manifestly unjust (Jennifer Davidson v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., et al., No. 14-1783, N. D. Calif.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64168).
SAN DIEGO - A federal judge in California on May 13 dismissed with leave to amend a plaintiff's class action complaint, which includes state unfair competition law claims (UCL), accusing a supplement maker of falsely labeling a male enhancement supplement because it does not produce the promised effects (Ryan Vigil v. General Nutrition Corp., No. 15-79, S.D. Calif.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63506).
ATLANTA - A motion to compel the underlying material in 27 "general" studies produced by the Federal Trade Commission relating to settlements of patent disputes between brand-name and generic drug manufacturers was denied May 11 by a Georgia federal judge (In re: Androgel Antitrust Litigation [No. II], MDL No. 2084 [All Cases], No. 1:09-md-2084, N.D. Ga.; Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc., et al., No. 1:09-cv-955, N.D. Ga.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61076).
WHITE PLAINS, N.Y. - Class action claims, which include a California state unfair competition law (UCL) claim, will continue against the producer and seller of food, body care and home care products after a New York federal judge on May 7 held that federal laws did not preempt the plaintiffs' claims that the defendant mislabeled products as "organic," "natural" or "all natural" (Leah Segedie, et al. v. The Hain Celestial Group Inc., No. 14-5029, S. D. N.Y.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60739).
SAN JOSE, Calif. - A federal judge in California on May 6 dismissed with leave to amend a plaintiff's class action claims, including one for violation of the state's unfair competition law (UCL), against a bread manufacturer for allegedly misleading labels, saying the claims were not pleaded with the specificity required for claims sounding in fraud (Kelly Romero v. Flowers Bakeries, No. 14-5189, N.D. Calif.; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59498).
LOS ANGELES - Finding that Blue Cross of California presented plausible evidence to establish federal jurisdiction over a putative class action related to liability from a data breach, a California federal judge in a May 5 in chambers order denied the plaintiffs' motion to remand to state court (Manuel Vasquez, et al. v. Blue Cross of California, et al., No. 2:15-cv-02055, C.D. Calif.).