PITTSBURGH - The Pennsylvania Superior Court on Dec. 3 found that underlying complaints involving defectively designed or manufactured windows and doors alleged an occurrence under a commercial umbrella insurance policy, reversing and remanding a lower court's ruling in favor of the insurer (Indalex Inc., et al. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, No. 612 WDA 2012, Pa. Super.; 2013 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3186).
PHILADELPHIA - There is no genuine issue of material fact regarding whether a federal flood insurer paid all that was validly claimed of it for insureds' losses arising from a flooded stream, a Pennsylvania federal judge ruled Nov. 27, rejecting the insureds' claims seeking an additional $20,864.28 in damages (Francis Rudi, et al. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., No. 2:11-cv-04362-WY, E.D. Pa.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168618).
PHILADELPHIA - A claim by a woman who alleges that she had a therapeutic abortion because the antidepressant Paxil caused a heart defect in her unborn son missed a two-year statute of limitations and failed to show that the manufacturer fraudulently concealed the drug's birth defect risk, a Pennsylvania appeals court panel ruled Nov. 17 (Joanne Thomas, et al. v. Smith Kline Beecham Corporation, et al., No. 2461 EDA 2012, Pa. Super.).
PHILADELPHIA - A federal judge in Pennsylvania on Nov. 21 held that an apartment complex owner sufficiently stated a claim under the Clean Water Act (CWA) based on how oil leaked from an underground storage tank on a nearby college campus to a navigable waterway of the United States but dismissed the plaintiff's claim under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA), ruling that migration of oil from soil to groundwater does not constitute a discharge under the statute (Tri-Realty Company v. Ursinus College, No. 11-5885, E.D. Pa.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165471).
PITTSBURGH - A federal magistrate judge in Pennsylvania overseeing discovery in a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) lawsuit on Nov. 22 denied a renewed motion to compel filed by a defendant company, finding that it was unable to show that the plaintiff groups waived privilege over documents they withheld under the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine by allegedly sharing them with third parties (PennEnvironment, et al. v. PPG Industries Inc., et al., No. 12-342, W.D. Pa.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166029).
PITTSBURGH - A Pennsylvania federal judge on Nov. 21 granted motions for expedited preliminary injunctions in two separate cases brought by Catholic organizations challenging the birth control mandate contained in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) (Most Reverend David A. Zubik, et al. v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al., No. 13-1459, Most Reverend Lawrence T. Persico, et al. v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al., No. 13-303, W.D. Pa.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165922).
HARRISBURG, Pa. - The exclusivity provision in Pennsylvania's workers' compensation act does not bar a tort action when the injury arises outside the act's 300-week limit for compensation, the state Supreme Court held Nov. 22 in a 5-1 opinion reinstating two asbestos actions (Kathleen Tooey, et al. v. AK Steel Corp., et al., Spurgeon E. Landis and Mary Landis v. A.W.Chesterton Co., et al., Nos. 21 WAP 2011, 22 WAP 2011, Pa. Sup.).
PITTSBURGH - A Pennsylvania federal judge on Nov. 20 refused to dismiss insurers' claims for professional negligence and common-law indemnity against insurance agents (Berkley Mid-Atlantic Group LLC, et al. v. G.F. Hoch Company Inc., et al., No. 13-372, W.D. Pa.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 164872).
SAN FRANCISCO - Two Pennsylvania residents likely lack standing to pursue their California unfair competition law (UCL) action over an automobile manufacturer's choice of gas tank material but also fail to state a claim under the statute, a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel held Nov. 20 (Henry Troup; Veronica Troup v. Toyota Motor Corp., Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. Inc., No. 11-56637, 9th Cir.).
PHILADELPHIA - A federal judge in Pennsylvania on Nov. 18 dismissed a class action suit accusing Bank of America Corp. of violating the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) by engaging in a scheme to collect kickbacks and referral fees from private mortgage insurers after finding that the plaintiffs' claims were barred by the statute's one-year limitations period (Thomas J. Riddle, et al. v. Bank of America Corp., et al., No. 12-1740, E.D. Pa.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163526).
SCRANTON, Pa. - Noting that a determination of whether an insurer acted in bad faith does not involve "delving into matters that are scientific in nature," a Pennsylvania federal judge on Nov. 15 granted the insurer's motion to preclude testimony of the plaintiff's bad faith expert in a dispute over underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage (Michael Scott v. GEICO General Insurance Co., No. 3:11-cv-01790, M.D. Pa.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162642).
JOHNSTOWN, Pa. - A health insurance company's motion to dismiss a call center manager's wage-and-hour class complaint was denied Nov. 15 by a Pennsylvania federal judge (Jacqueline Rummel, et al. v. Highmark, Inc., No. 13-87, W.D. Pa.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162757).
PHILADELPHIA - A Pennsylvania state court jury on Nov. 18 awarded more than $10 million to a family whose son was born with a cleft palate allegedly caused by his mother's use of the antiepileptic drug Topamax during pregnancy, according to one of the law firms representing the family (Brayden Gurley, et al. v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceutical, Inc., No. 110502251, Pa. Comm. Pls., Philadelphia Co.).
PHILADELPHIA - Allegations that Viacom Inc. copied a plaintiff's treatment for a reality television show were properly dismissed by a Pennsylvania federal judge, the Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled Nov. 14 (Charles L. Sims v. Viacom Inc., No. 13-1567, 3rd Cir.).
HARRISBURG, Pa. - A patent dispute will proceed with the testimony of two competing expert witnesses, thanks to two Nov. 13 rulings by a Pennsylvania federal judge (Kimberly Clark Worldwide Inc. v. First Quality Baby Products LLC et al., No. 09-1685, M.D. Pa.).
PITTSBURGH - A Pennsylvania federal bankruptcy judge on Nov. 12 mostly denied a motion by two insurance companies to reconsider confirmation of Pittsburgh Corning Corp.'s Chapter 11 plan of reorganization, granting the request only to make clear what affiliates of the debtor are protected from asbestos personal injury suits by the plan's channeling injunction (In re: Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, No. 00-22876, W.D. Pa. Bkcy.; 2013 Bankr. LEXIS 4792).
PHILADELPHIA - A Pennsylvania Superior Court panel on Nov. 6 partly reversed and partly affirmed a trial court's summary judgment in favor of an umbrella insurer and its duties to defend and indemnify an engineering contractor in an underlying negligence lawsuit, finding that a professional services exclusion did not preclude coverage (Lexington Insurance Co. v. The Charter Oak Fire Insurance Co., et al., No. 2876 EDA 2012, Pa. Super.; 2013 PA Super 286; 2013 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3146).
PHILADELPHIA - GlaxoSmithKline LLC (GSK) on Nov. 11 asked the Pennsylvania federal judge overseeing the Avandia multidistrict Litigation to certify an interlocutory appeal of her order denying dismissal of racketeering and consumer class action claims brought against the company by three union health and welfare funds (In Re: Avandia Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation, MDL Docket No. 1871, No. 07-md-1871, E.D. Pa.).
CHICAGO - An Illinois federal judge on Nov. 7 declined to grant summary judgment motions brought by both sides in a reimbursement dispute between chiropractors and a group of insurance companies (Pennsylvania Chiropractic Association, et al. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, et al., No. 09-5619, N.D. Ill; 2101 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159331).
HARRISBURG, Pa. - Claims against a reinsurance policy issued by an insolvent insurer were properly classified as priority (e) under 40 Pennsylvania Statutes Section 221.44, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court affirmed Oct. 30 (CSAC Excess Insurance Authority v. Reliance Insurance Co. in liquidation (ancillary matter to In re: Reliance Insurance Co., No. 102 MAP 2012, Pa. Sup.; 2013 Pa. LEXIS 2559).
PHILADELPHIA - A Pennsylvania jury on Oct. 30 found that Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. failed to warn about the risk of birth defects from its Topamax epilepsy drug and awarded the injured minor $4 million in damages (April Czimmer, et al. v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceutica, No. 1105-03459, Pa. Comm. Pls., Philadelphia Co.).
PHILADELPHIA - Two defendants won dismissal of copyright infringement allegations Oct. 25, when a Pennsylvania federal judge agreed that the claim is barred by the doctrine of res judicata (Teri Woods Publishing LLC, et al. v. Urban Knowledge Bookstore LLC, et al., No. 12-4854, E.D. Pa.).
SCRANTON, Pa. - A Pennsylvania physician who alleges that statutory restrictions on his ability to discover the chemicals in proprietary hydraulic fracturing fluids used in natural gas extraction violates his civil rights under the First and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution and exposes him to professional disciplinary action by the American Medical Association lacks standing to challenge the statute, a U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania judge ruled Oct. 23 (Dr. Alfonso Rodriguez, M.D., v. Michael L. Krancer, et al., No. 12-1458, M.D. PA.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152207).
GREENSBORO, N.C. - Although a North Carolina federal judge found evidence that an insurer acted unreasonably in part of its handling of an underinsured motorist (UIM) claim, the judge held Oct. 18 that genuine disputes of material fact mostly precluded him from granting the parties' competing motions for partial summary judgment on the deceptive trade practices and bad faith claims against the insurer (Lawrence D. Guessford Jr. v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Co., No. 1:12-cv-260, M.D. N.C.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150070).
SCRANTON, Pa. - A federal judge in Pennsylvania on Oct. 17 denied a borrower's motion to dismiss a suit arising from a mortgage loan involving the failed Washington Mutual Bank (WaMu), disagreeing with her assertion that Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., as trustee for the loan, lacks standing to bring the action (Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Lucille Adragna, No. 13-1050, M.D. Pa.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149632).