Somewhat lost amid the flurry of
opinions handed down by the United States Supreme Court at the end of
the 2010-11 session was its grant of certiori in PPL Montana LLC v. Montana (the
link takes you to the SCOTUSblog page for the case, which contains the
underlying opinion and the cert documents). PPL Montana, Montana's
largest private producer of hydroelectric power, appealed a decision
from the Montana Supreme Court that, among other things, required the
company to pay rent for its use of Montana rivers. The Montana Supreme
Court concluded that the Missouri, Madison, and Clark Fork Rivers were
owned by the state because the rivers as a whole were navigable when
Montana entered the Union. The company argued, unsuccesfully, that the
navigability of a river must be determined "section by section," rather
than in the entirety, and that the portions of the rivers that the
company uses are not navigable.
The case is seen by many commentators as
another opportunity for the U.S. Supreme Court to address the notion of
"judicial takings" that it recently addressed in Stop the Beach Renourishment v. Flordia Dept. of Environmental Protection.
(Broadly speaking, the question presented in that case was whether a
judicial decision can qualify as a "taking" - think eminent domain -
that requires the person from whom property is taken to be compensated
under the U.S. Constitution.) In Stop the Beach, Chief Justice Roberts
and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, and Alito held that there was such a thing
as a judicial taking (although no member of the court believed there
was a taking in the case itself). Several other justices suggested
that they might be pursuaded to join these four in a future decision,
but that Stop the Beach was not the right case to do so because there
was no taking and thus the court did not need to reach the broader,
essentially theoretical, question of whether judicial action could ever
amount to a taking. The PPL Montana case may provide the opportunity
for at least one of these justices to join the four who are
already willing to recognize judicial takings. Stay tuned for more
details as the case develops.
View more from the Porzio Real Property Blog.
We welcome and encourage your
comments below. Also, please subscribe to the Porzio Real Property Blog
to keep up with the latest news and information about New Jersey land use, real
estate, and environmental issues.
For more information about LexisNexis products and
solutions connect with us through our corporate