If you read about the evidence, you can't really be
surprised that Raj Rajaratnam was found guilty of insider trading. That he was
found guilty on all counts was mildly interesting, but not much.
We may get some interesting new legal developments in
insider trading law from the appellate decisions. But probably not. The case
seems solid. It does not pose the more interesting legal analysis seen in the
charges brought in some of the expert network case.
The most interesting aspect of Raj's case is the
government's use of wiretaps and surveillance. The typical insider trading case
relies on some extremely timely trades and a clear opportunity to have acquired
knowledge about a significant corporate action. With Raj, his own voice
betrayed him. The government was willing to spend considerable considerable
effort to gather evidence.
Was it a legal victory? How do you measure success from a
"We started out with 37 stocks, we're down to 14,"
defense attorney John Dowd said today after his client was found guilty on 9
counts of insider trading and 5 counts of conspiracy. "The score is 23 to 14
for the defense. We'll see you in the Second Circuit."
additional commentary on developments in compliance and ethics, visit Compliance Building,
a blog hosted by Doug Cornelius.
For more information about LexisNexis
products and solutions connect with us through our corporate site.