Plaintiffs' Lawyers Pursue Non-U.S. Securities Litigation Alternatives After Morrison

One of the questions posed in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark decision in Morrison v. National Australia Bank is whether the Court's holding might encourage securities claimants foreclosed by Morrison from U.S. court to attempt to pursue their claims in their home countries...

Applying Morrison, Court Rejects Toyota Shareholders' Japanese Law Securities Claims

The U.S. Supreme Court's June 2010 decision in Morrison v. National Australia Bank looked like the end of securities claims in U.S. courts on behalf so-called "f-cubed" claimants - that is, foreign shareholders of foreign-domiciled companies who bought their shares on foreign exchanges...

Canadian Courts Struggle with Jurisdictional Issues in Securities Suits

The question of when domestic securities laws provide remedies for investors who purchased their shares in foreign companies on foreign exchanges vexed U.S. courts for years until the U.S. Supreme Court sorted out the issues in Morrison v. National Australia Bank [ an enhanced version of this opinion...