The AIA’s Positions on Workers’ Compensation Issues— Medical Costs, AMA Guides Sixth Edition, State Funds, and California’s Left Coast Litigation: Taking a Hard Look at the Ball of Confusion

By Karen Yotis, Esq. When Norman Whitfield and Barrett Strong penned “Ball of Confusion (That’s What the World Is Today)”, they could hardly have anticipated that the political anthem the Temptations recorded in 1970 would mirror the state of our country’s workers’ compensation...

Should California Switch to the AMA Guides Sixth Edition?

By Robert G. Rassp, Esq. This is a no holds barred editorial commentary. It is not intended to be neutral but it is intended to be factual. We wrote this article to draw the line in the sand in California in the event there is any effort to impose the use of the AMA Guides 6th Edition on our workers’...

California: Ogilvie Reversed – Confusion Reigns

The 1st District Court of Appeal has issued its decision in the combined cases of Ogilvie v W.C.A.B./ City and County of SF v WCAB reversing the W.C.A.B. en banc decision but upholding the concept of a rebuttable schedule. In its decision the Court specifically finds the W.C.A.B. exceeded its authority...

California EAMS: Medical Reports as Evidence

Last fall, we issued a blog discussing Rule 8 CCR §10629 which sets forth the perimeters for filing exhibits in EAMS for trial. The rule requires that all parties create and serve a list of the exhibits they plan to offer as evidence at trial, preferably at the mandatory settlement conference (MSC...

California EAMS: Medical Reports as Evidence

Last fall, we issued a blog discussing Rule 8 CCR §10629 which sets forth the perimeters for filing exhibits in EAMS for trial. The rule requires that all parties create and serve a list of the exhibits they plan to offer as evidence at trial, preferably at the mandatory settlement conference (MSC...

California: By the Numbers

What was the impact of the adoption of an AMA-based permanent disability rating schedule in California? That was the question addressed in a significant new study by Frank Neuhauser, Executive Director of the UC Berkeley based Center for the Study of Social Insurance. My last post briefly covered...

California: How to Prove a LeBoeuf Rebuttal

New Clues on Applying an Ogilvie III Analysis in a DFEC Rebuttal Case In a recent panel decision of Dahl v. Contra Costa County (ADJ1310387) issued on May 18, 2012, the WCAB commissioners shed some light on how to apply an Ogilvie III analysis in a DFEC rebuttal case. Set forth below is the historical...

California: Rating Impairments That Are Missing From the AMA Guides

Attention Lexis Online Subscribers: Case citations link to lexis.com. Bracketed case citations link to Lexis Advance. In the recent WCAB panel decision of Cannon v. City of Sacramento, (2012) 2012 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 615 [ 2012 Cal. Wrk. Comp. P.D. LEXIS 615 ], the WCAB Commissioners analyzed...