COLUMBUS, Ohio - A law firm insured's failure to report an underlying malpractice claim during its 2002-2003 professional responsibility insurance policy or in response to a question on its renewal application does not result in a finding that the insured's subsequent policy excluded coverage for the claim, a Ohio federal judge held Nov. 24, denying the insurer's motion for summary judgment (PDIC v. Wiles, Boyle, Burkholder & Bringardner Co., No. 2:06-CV-240, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Div.; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109998). From Mealey's Emerging Insurance Disputes