Sign on to your service
---------------------------------
LexisNexis at lexis.com
Nexis
LexisNexis by Credit Card
---------------------------------
Academic
Accurint
Analyzer
Anti-Money Laundering Solutions
atVantage
Automated Forms
Collection Solutions
Congressional
Corporate Legal
CourtLink
CourtLink Strategic Profiles
Daily Opinion Service
Development Pro
Environmental
Europe Web Product
Experts & Services Directory
Express Screening
File & Serve
Full Service Screening
Get & Print
Gov Periodicals Index
InstantID
InstantID Q&A
Insurance Compliance
Insurance Solutions
Intranet Solutions
Law Schools
Law Enforcement Solutions
lexisONE
MarketImpact
Martindale-Hubbell
Matthew Bender Online
Mealey's Free Legal News
Mealey's Online
PowerInvoice
Primary Sources in U.S. History
Professional Development Center
Publisher
Purch. & Supply Chain Solutions
Risk Management Solutions
RiskWise
Scholastic Edition
State Capital
Statistical
Tax Center
Telnet Connection
Total Litigator
Vendor Screening
Litigation Services
>
Legal News
>
News Story
Buy Now
Contact A Sales Rep
Access to
Total Litigator
Home
Early Case
Assessment
Draft,
File and Serve
Discovery
Research
Gather
Intelligence
Trial Prep
Alerts and
Tracks
Search by
Source
ViewLitigation Headlines
Legal News & Litigation Reports
Legal News
Headlines
View by Topic
View by Jurisdiction
Verdicts & Settlements
Free Views
Commentaries
Litigation Reports
View by Topic
View by Jurisdiction
Executive Summaries
What's New
Document Access Services
Contact
RSS News Feeds
Podcasts
Email This Page
Print This Page
Legal News
Insurance Law
Monday, November 30, 2009
No Coverage Owed For Costs To Prevent Future Harmful Emission, Panel Says
INDIANAPOLIS - Because court-ordered remedies imposed to prevent future harmful emissions from a power plant were not caused by an occurrence, insurers have no duty to defend or indemnify an insured in underlying federal litigation, an Indiana Court of Appeals panel held Oct. 28 (Cinergy Corp., et al. v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Co., et al., No. 32A04-0810-CV-622, Ind. App.; 2009 Ind. App. LEXIS 2251).
From Mealey's Litigation Report: Insurance
Access this news story on Lexis.com
Buy the full report in print
Buy this news story on MealeysOnline
Related Court Documents on MealeysOnline:
Opinion. Document #03-091104-001Z.
View Headlines by Topic
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Attorney's Fees
Banking Law
Bankruptcy
Business Law
Civil Practice & Procedure: Federal
Civil Practice & Procedure: State
Computer Law
Constitutional Law
Contracts
Criminal Justice
Criminal Law & Procedure
Evidence
Federal Practice
Government Law
Insurance Law
Intellectual Property Law
International
Litigation
Motor Vehicle/Traffic Law
Patent Law
Personal Injury Law/Medico-Legal
Products Liability
Regulatory Law
Remedies
Securities Law
Statutes
Torts
Trademarks
View Headlines by Jurisdiction
Select a Jurisdiction
California
Colorado
Delaware
FEDERAL
Georgia
International
Kentucky
Louisiana
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
New Jersey
New York
Pennsylvania
Texas
Utah
Virginia
BREAKING NEWS
Aredia/Zometa Plaintiffs Fail To Surmount Michigan Drug Shield Law
Jury Awards HRT Plaintiff $28 Million In Punitive Damages; Other Award Unsealed
Woman Awarded $6.3M For Breast Cancer Caused By Hormone Therapy Use
>
View all Breaking News
More Insurance Law Headlines
Marsh & McLennan Settles Bid-Rigging Securities Class For $400 Million
Judge Rules Insurance Broker Breached Duty To Properly Renew Coverage
Reliance On Medical Reviews Was Reasonable, 3rd Circuit Says
Court: Evidence Supports Benefit Termination During Any-Occupation Period
View all Insurance Law Headlines
Related Products
Insurance Law Litigation Reports
Mealey's Litigation Report: Catastrophic Loss
Mealey's Litigation Report: Construction Defects Insurance
View more Insurance Law Litigation Reports
Live Conferences
Mealey's 16th Annual Insurance Insolvency & Reinsurance Roundtable
More Live Conferences
Teleconferences
Mealey's Teleconference: Asbestos Insurance
More Teleconferences