LexisNexis Home Products & Services Customer Service Center Company Information Alliance Partners LexisNexis Bookstore Search


  Current Subscribers
  
LexisNexis Litigation News and Reports
Non Subscribers: Find a product that's right for you!
Expert Witness Summary Directory

Buy NowBuy Now

Contact A Sales RepContact A Sales Rep



 
   
 
Legal News
Regulatory Law
Wednesday, December 02, 2009
 

View Headlines by Topic

View Headlines by Jurisdiction

BREAKING NEWS 
> View all Breaking News    
Parties In Listerine Case Brief Court On UCL Class, Restitution After Tobacco II
LOS ANGELES - Parties recently filed supplemental briefs on whether a putative class can bring an unfair competition law (UCL) suit against a mouthwash maker for claims that its products worked as well as flossing after In re: Tobacco II Cases ([2009] 46 Cal.4th 298) (Pfizer Inc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles Co., Steve Galfano, No. B188106, Calif. App., 2nd Dist.). From Mealey's California Section 17200 Report

Related Court Documents on MealeysOnline:

Court: Tobacco II Applies To Standing Issues Alone, Not Questions Of Commonality
LOS ANGELES - The California Supreme Court's recent ruling on reliance in unfair competition law cases in In re: Tobacco II Cases ([2009] 46 Cal.4th 298) applies to issues of standing, and not to ones of commonality in class actions, a California appeals court held in certifying an opinion for publication on Oct 28 (Philip Kent Cohen v. DirecTV Inc., No. B204986, Calif. App., 2nd Dist, Div. 8; 2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1728). From Mealey's California Section 17200 Report

Related Court Documents on MealeysOnline:

More Regulatory Law Headlines

Related Products